Suppr超能文献

胶囊内镜检查的并发症、局限性及失败情况:733例病例回顾

Complications, limitations, and failures of capsule endoscopy: a review of 733 cases.

作者信息

Rondonotti Emanuele, Herrerias Juan Manuel, Pennazio Marco, Caunedo Angel, Mascarenhas-Saraiva Miguel, de Franchis Roberto

机构信息

Gastroenterology and GI Endoscopy Service, IRCCS Maggiore Policlinico Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2005 Nov;62(5):712-6; quiz 752, 754. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.05.002.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although a variety of technical and clinical problems of capsule endoscopy have been reported, their incidence and clinical importance are unknown. The objective was to evaluate the incidence and the type of such events.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of 733 consecutive examinations at 4 large referral centers. The main outcome measurements were that the problems were classified as "technical," i.e., related to the functioning of the equipment, and "clinical," i.e., related to patient characteristics. For each type of event, the causes and the impact on the ability to reach a diagnosis were examined.

RESULTS

A total of 183 problems were recorded in 174 patients (23.7%): one problem occurred in 165 patients, two in 9 patients. In 8.46% of patients, technical limitations or failures, or clinical complications prevented or hampered diagnosis. Technical problems (e.g., gaps in the recordings, short duration of capsule batteries, failure of downloading) occurred in the early phase of capsule use in 8.6% of examinations and prevented or hampered diagnosis in 2.9%. Clinical problems (difficulty/inability to swallow the capsule, incomplete small-bowel examination) occurred in 16.4% of examinations and hampered or prevented diagnosis in 6.4%. Capsule retention that required surgical or endoscopic retrieval occurred in 1.9% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Technical problems were rare and hampered or prevented the diagnosis in a very small number of cases. The majority of clinical failures were related to an incomplete small-bowel examination.

摘要

背景

尽管已有关于胶囊内镜各种技术和临床问题的报道,但其发生率及临床重要性尚不清楚。目的是评估此类事件的发生率及类型。

方法

这是一项对4家大型转诊中心连续733例检查的回顾性分析。主要观察指标是将问题分为“技术”类,即与设备功能相关的问题,以及“临床”类,即与患者特征相关的问题。对于每种类型的事件,检查其原因及对诊断能力的影响。

结果

共174例患者记录到183个问题(23.7%):165例患者出现1个问题,9例患者出现2个问题。8.46%的患者因技术限制或故障、或临床并发症导致诊断受阻或无法诊断。技术问题(如记录中断、胶囊电池续航时间短、下载失败)在胶囊使用早期的检查中发生率为8.6%,导致诊断受阻或无法诊断的比例为2.9%。临床问题(吞咽胶囊困难/无法吞咽、小肠检查不完整)在检查中发生率为16.4%,导致诊断受阻或无法诊断的比例为6.4%。需要手术或内镜取出的胶囊滞留发生率为1.9%。

结论

技术问题罕见,仅在极少数情况下会阻碍或无法诊断。大多数临床诊断失败与小肠检查不完整有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验