Edge Johann, Bishop David, Goodman Carmel
Team Sport Research Group, School of Human Movement and Exercise Science, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA, 6009, Australia.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2006 Jan;96(1):97-105. doi: 10.1007/s00421-005-0068-6. Epub 2005 Nov 10.
We examined changes in muscle buffer capacity (beta m(in vitro)), VO2peak and the lactate threshold (LT) after 5 weeks of high-intensity interval training (INT) above the LT or moderate-intensity continuous training (CON) just below the LT. Prior to and immediately after training, 16 female subjects performed a graded exercise test to determine VO2peak and the LT, followed 2 days later by a resting muscle biopsy from the vastus lateralis muscle to determine beta m(in vitro). Following baseline testing, the subjects were randomly placed into the INT (n=8) or CON training group (n=8). Subjects then performed 5 weeks of cycle training (3 days per week), performing either high-intensity INT (6-10x2 min at 120-140% LT with 1 min rest) or moderate-intensity CON (80-95% LT) training. Total training volume was matched between the two groups. After the training period, both groups had significant improvements in VO2peak (12-14%; P<0.05) and the LT (7-10%; P<0.05), with no significant differences between groups. The INT group, however, had significantly greater improvements in beta m(in vitro) (25%; 123+/-5-153+/-7 micromol H+ x g muscle dm(-1) x pH(-1); P<0.05) than the CON group (2%; 130+/-12-133+/-7 micromol H+ x g muscle dm(-1) x pH(-1), P>0.05). Our results show that when matched for training volume, high-intensity interval training above the LT results in similar improvements in VO2peak and the LT, but greater improvements in beta m(in vitro) than moderate-intensity continuous training below the LT. This suggests that training intensity is an important determinant of changes to beta m(in vitro).
我们研究了在高于乳酸阈值(LT)的高强度间歇训练(INT)或略低于LT的中等强度持续训练(CON)5周后,肌肉缓冲能力(βm(体外))、最大摄氧量(VO2peak)和乳酸阈值(LT)的变化。在训练前和训练后即刻,16名女性受试者进行了分级运动测试以确定VO2peak和LT,2天后从股外侧肌进行静息肌肉活检以确定βm(体外)。在基线测试后,受试者被随机分为INT组(n = 8)或CON训练组(n = 8)。然后受试者进行5周的自行车训练(每周3天),进行高强度INT(6 - 10次,每次2分钟,强度为120 - 140%LT,休息1分钟)或中等强度CON(80 - 95%LT)训练。两组的总训练量相匹配。训练期结束后,两组的VO2peak(12 - 14%;P < 0.05)和LT(7 - 10%;P < 0.05)均有显著改善,两组之间无显著差异。然而,INT组的βm(体外)改善程度(25%;123±5 - 153±7微摩尔H⁺×克肌肉干重⁻¹×pH⁻¹;P < 0.05)显著大于CON组(2%;130±12 - 133±7微摩尔H⁺×克肌肉干重⁻¹×pH⁻¹,P > 0.05)。我们的结果表明,当训练量相匹配时,高于LT的高强度间歇训练在VO2peak和LT方面的改善相似,但在βm(体外)方面的改善大于低于LT的中等强度持续训练。这表明训练强度是βm(体外)变化的重要决定因素。