Morfeld Matthias, Bullinger Monika, Nantke Juliane, Brähler Elmar
Zentrum für Psychosoziale Medizin, Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Deutschland.
Soz Praventivmed. 2005;50(5):292-300. doi: 10.1007/s00038-005-4090-6.
The SF-36 is an internationally approved instrument to assess subjective health. In its second version the SF-36 contains modifications to version 1.0 in several item formulations and response categories. The second version is translated in German but a psychometric analysis and standardisation are still lacking.
The SF-36, version 2.0, was administered in a representative German sample (n = 2043), analysed concerning its scale structure, reliability, dissemination characteristics and differences in traits of populations and compared to version 1.0 (German health survey).
Version 2.0 shows high reliability in subscales and has a scale structure which is comparable to that of version 1.0. The scale values in the actual population-representative sample survey are rather distributed obliquely and effects of sex, age and residence (Eastern/Western Germany) have been found in regression analyses.
The psychometric comparability of both versions is given but should interpreted with caution as regards content because of the different enquiry periods. Though the expected gain in psychometric quality and discrimination of version 2.0 to version 1.0 is evident, but does not justify a preference to version 2.0.
SF-36是一种国际认可的评估主观健康状况的工具。其第二版在多个项目表述和反应类别方面对1.0版进行了修改。第二版已被翻译成德语,但仍缺乏心理测量分析和标准化。
对2.0版的SF-36在一个具有代表性的德国样本(n = 2043)中进行施测,分析其量表结构、信度、分布特征以及不同人群特征的差异,并与1.0版(德国健康调查)进行比较。
2.0版在分量表中显示出高信度,且其量表结构与1.0版相当。在实际的具有人群代表性的样本调查中,量表值分布较为倾斜,回归分析发现了性别、年龄和居住地(德国东部/西部)的影响。
两个版本在心理测量方面具有可比性,但由于询问时期不同,在内容方面应谨慎解释。虽然2.0版相对于1.0版在心理测量质量和区分度上的预期提升是明显的,但并不足以表明更倾向于2.0版。