Suárez B, Lope V, Pérez-Gómez B, Aragonés N, Rodríguez-Artalejo F, Marqués F, Guzmán A, Viloria L J, Carrasco J M, Martín-Moreno J M, López-Abente G, Pollán M
National Centre for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Public Health, Madrid 28039, Spain.
Environ Res. 2005 Nov;99(3):413-24. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2004.12.012.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate exposure conditions and acute health effects in subjects participating in the Prestige oil spill cleanup activities and the association between these and the nature of the work and use of protection devices in the regions of Asturias and Cantabria (Spain). The sample comprised 400 subjects in each region, selected from a random sampling of all persons involved in cleanup activities, stratified by type of worker and number of working days. Data were obtained via a structured questionnaire and included information on specific tasks, number of working days, use of protective materials, and acute health effects. These effects were classified into two broad groups: injuries and toxic effects. Data analysis was performed using complex survey methods. Significant differences between groups were evaluated using Pearson's chi(2) test. Unconditional logistic regression was used to compute odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals. Bird cleaners accounted for the highest prevalence of injuries (19% presented with lesions). Working more than 20 days in highly polluted areas was associated with increased risk of injury in all workers. Occurrence of toxic effects was higher among seamen, possibly due to higher exposure to fuel oil and its components. Toxic effects were more frequent among those working longer than 20 days in highly polluted areas, performing three or more different cleaning activities, having skin contact with fuel oil on head/neck or upper limbs, and eating while in contact with fuel or perceiving disturbing odors. No severe disorders were identified among individuals who performed these tasks. However, potential health impact should be considered when organizing cleanup activities in similar environmental disasters.
本研究的目的是评估参与“威望号”漏油清理活动的人员的暴露条件和急性健康影响,以及这些与工作性质和西班牙阿斯图里亚斯和坎塔布里亚地区防护设备使用之间的关联。样本包括每个地区的400名受试者,从参与清理活动的所有人员中随机抽样选取,按工人类型和工作日数分层。通过结构化问卷获取数据,包括特定任务、工作日数、防护材料使用情况以及急性健康影响等信息。这些影响分为两大类:损伤和毒性作用。使用复杂的调查方法进行数据分析。组间差异显著性采用Pearson卡方检验评估。采用非条件逻辑回归计算比值比和95%置信区间。鸟类清理人员的损伤患病率最高(19%有损伤)。在高污染地区工作超过20天与所有工人的受伤风险增加有关。海员中出现毒性作用的情况较多,可能是由于接触燃料油及其成分的机会更多。在高污染地区工作超过20天、进行三项或更多不同清理活动、头部/颈部或上肢皮肤接触燃料油以及在接触燃料时进食或闻到刺鼻气味的人员中,毒性作用更为常见。在执行这些任务的人员中未发现严重疾病。然而,在组织类似环境灾难的清理活动时,应考虑潜在的健康影响。