• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign.基层医疗中识字能力的快速评估:最新的生命体征。
Ann Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):514-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.405.
2
How long does it take to assess literacy skills in clinical practice?在临床实践中评估读写能力需要多长时间?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 May-Jun;21(3):211-4. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.03.070217.
3
Brief health literacy screening items predict newest vital sign scores.简短的健康素养筛查项目可预测最新生命体征评分。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;26(5):558-65. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2013.05.130096.
4
Development and validation of the Rapid Estimate of Adolescent Literacy in Medicine (REALM-Teen): a tool to screen adolescents for below-grade reading in health care settings.青少年医学素养快速评估工具(REALM-Teen)的开发与验证:一种在医疗环境中筛查青少年阅读水平低于年级标准情况的工具。
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):e1707-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1139.
5
Development and evaluation of an oral health literacy instrument for adults.成人口腔健康素养工具的开发与评估
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2009 Oct;37(5):451-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.2009.00490.x.
6
Health literacy instrument in family medicine: the "newest vital sign" ease of use and correlates.家庭医学中的健康素养工具:“最新生命体征”的易用性及其相关性。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):195-203. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.070278.
7
Development and validation of a measure of health literacy in the UK: the newest vital sign.英国健康素养测量方法的开发与验证:最新生命体征
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 7;13:116. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-116.
8
Brief report: screening items to identify patients with limited health literacy skills.简短报告:用于识别健康素养技能有限患者的筛查项目
J Gen Intern Med. 2006 Aug;21(8):874-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00532.x.
9
Comparing the Performance of the S-TOFHLA and NVS Among and Between English and Spanish Speakers.比较英语和西班牙语使用者中S-TOFHLA和NVS的表现。
J Health Commun. 2015;20(12):1458-64. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1018629. Epub 2015 Jul 6.
10
Comparison of Newest Vital Sign and Brief Health Literacy Screen scores in a large, urban Hispanic cohort.最新生命体征与简短健康素养筛查评分在大型城市西班牙裔人群中的比较。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 Apr;109:107628. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107628. Epub 2023 Jan 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Pedagogically Aligned Objectives Create Reliable Automatic Cloze Tests.教学目标一致可创建可靠的自动完形测试。
Proc Conf. 2024 Jun;2024:3961-3972. doi: 10.18653/v1/2024.naacl-long.220.
2
Health literacy model integrating health education, health behaviors, self-rated health, and socioeconomic status in the Chinese population.整合健康教育、健康行为、自评健康和社会经济地位的中国人群健康素养模型。
Sci Rep. 2025 Sep 2;15(1):32320. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-07094-3.
3
Sociodemographic disparities in health literacy among American adults: A national survey study.美国成年人健康素养中的社会人口学差异:一项全国性调查研究。
Prev Med Rep. 2025 Jul 16;57:103179. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2025.103179. eCollection 2025 Sep.
4
The complex relationship between treatment burden of multimorbidity and self-care in multimorbid patients with hypertension.高血压多病共患患者中,多种疾病治疗负担与自我护理之间的复杂关系。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jul 9;26(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02916-9.
5
The forgotten spine score: study protocol for a novel patient-centered outcome measure in lumbar spine fusion surgery.被遗忘的脊柱评分:腰椎融合手术中一种以患者为中心的新型疗效指标的研究方案。
Front Surg. 2025 May 22;12:1547829. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1547829. eCollection 2025.
6
Primary and Emergency Care Use: The Roles of Health Literacy, Patient Activation, and Sleep Quality in a Latent Profile Analysis.初级和急诊护理的使用:健康素养、患者激活度和睡眠质量在潜在剖面分析中的作用
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 24;15(6):724. doi: 10.3390/bs15060724.
7
Validation of the Assessments of Adult Health Literacy: a Rasch measurement model approach.成人健康素养评估的验证:一种拉施测量模型方法。
Health Promot Int. 2025 May 13;40(3). doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaf090.
8
Health Literacy in An Otolaryngology Patient Population.耳鼻喉科患者群体的健康素养
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251330630. doi: 10.1177/19160216251330630. Epub 2025 Jun 21.
9
"Open Notes" in Pediatric Acute Care Cardiology: Caregiver and Provider Experiences in a Single Center.儿科急性护理心脏病学中的“开放病历”:单中心的照顾者与医护人员体验
J Pediatr Clin Pract. 2025 May 14;16:200147. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedcp.2025.200147. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10
Impact of health literacy and primary language on the decision to pursue trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.健康素养和母语对既往剖宫产术后试产决策的影响。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jun 3;25(1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12884-025-07788-6.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of low health literacy on the medical costs of Medicare managed care enrollees.低健康素养对医疗保险管理式医疗参保者医疗费用的影响。
Am J Med. 2005 Apr;118(4):371-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.01.010.
2
Use of clinical prediction rules in detecting osteoporosis in a population-based sample of postmenopausal women.在基于人群的绝经后女性样本中使用临床预测规则检测骨质疏松症。
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 14;165(5):530-6. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.5.530.
3
Validity and reliability of self-reported arthritis: Georgia senior centers, 2000-2001.自我报告的关节炎的有效性和可靠性:佐治亚州老年中心,2000 - 2001年
Am J Prev Med. 2005 Apr;28(3):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.12.004.
4
Screening for breast cancer.乳腺癌筛查
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1245-56. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.10.1245.
5
Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review.消费者对营养标签的理解与使用:一项系统综述
Public Health Nutr. 2005 Feb;8(1):21-8. doi: 10.1079/phn2005666.
6
Alcohol screening in young persons attending a sexually transmitted disease clinic. Comparison of AUDIT, CRAFFT, and CAGE instruments.在一家性传播疾病诊所就诊的年轻人中进行酒精筛查。AUDIT、CRAFFT和CAGE工具的比较。
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jan;20(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.40052.x.
7
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2002 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2002年总结
Adv Data. 2004 Aug 26(346):1-44.
8
Patients' understanding and use of snack food package nutrition labels.患者对休闲食品包装营养标签的理解与使用
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Sep-Oct;17(5):319-23. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.5.319.
9
Relationship between health care costs and very low literacy skills in a medically needy and indigent Medicaid population.医疗贫困和贫困医疗补助人群中医疗保健成本与极低识字技能之间的关系。
J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004 Jan-Feb;17(1):44-7. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.17.1.44.
10
Health literacy and knowledge of chronic disease.健康素养与慢性病知识
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Nov;51(3):267-75. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00239-2.

基层医疗中识字能力的快速评估:最新的生命体征。

Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign.

作者信息

Weiss Barry D, Mays Mary Z, Martz William, Castro Kelley Merriam, DeWalt Darren A, Pignone Michael P, Mockbee Joy, Hale Frank A

机构信息

University of Arizona College of Medicine, Department of Family and Community Medicine, Tucson 85719, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2005 Nov-Dec;3(6):514-22. doi: 10.1370/afm.405.

DOI:10.1370/afm.405
PMID:16338915
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1466931/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Current health literacy screening instruments for health care settings are either too long for routine use or available only in English. Our objective was to develop a quick and accurate screening test for limited literacy available in English and Spanish.

METHODS

We administered candidate items for the new instrument and also the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults (TOFHLA) to English-speaking and Spanish-speaking primary care patients. We measured internal consistency with Cronbach's alpha and assessed criterion validity by measuring correlations with TOFHLA scores. Using TOFLHA scores <75 to define limited literacy, we plotted receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves and calculated likelihood ratios for cutoff scores on the new instrument.

RESULTS

The final instrument, the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), is a nutrition label that is accompanied by 6 questions and requires 3 minutes for administration. It is reliable (Cronbach alpha >0.76 in English and 0.69 in Spanish) and correlates with the TOFHLA. Area under the ROC curve is 0.88 for English and 0.72 for Spanish versions. Patients with more than 4 correct responses are unlikely to have low literacy, whereas fewer than 4 correct answers indicate the possibility of limited literacy.

CONCLUSION

NVS is suitable for use as a quick screening test for limited literacy in primary health care settings.

摘要

目的

当前用于医疗保健机构的健康素养筛查工具要么太长不适用于常规使用,要么仅提供英文版本。我们的目标是开发一种快速且准确的筛查测试,用于评估英文和西班牙文读写能力有限的人群。

方法

我们向讲英语和讲西班牙语的初级保健患者发放了新工具的候选项目以及成人功能性健康素养测试(TOFHLA)。我们用克朗巴哈系数(Cronbach's alpha)测量内部一致性,并通过测量与TOFHLA分数的相关性来评估标准效度。使用TOFLHA分数<75来定义有限素养,我们绘制了受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线,并计算了新工具截止分数的似然比。

结果

最终工具“最新生命体征”(NVS)是一个营养标签,附带6个问题,完成测试需要3分钟。它具有可靠性(英文版本的克朗巴哈系数>0.76,西班牙文版本为0.69),并且与TOFHLA相关。英文版本的ROC曲线下面积为0.88,西班牙文版本为0.72。正确回答超过4个问题的患者不太可能具备低素养,而正确答案少于4个则表明可能存在有限素养。

结论

NVS适合用作初级卫生保健机构中有限素养的快速筛查测试。