van Schoor N M, Knol D L, Glas C A W, Ostelo R W J G, Leplège A, Cooper C, Johnell O, Lips P
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Osteoporos Int. 2006;17(4):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-0024-7. Epub 2005 Dec 14.
Vertebral deformities are a common consequence of osteoporosis and are known to decrease quality of life. The Qualeffo-41 is a quality-of-life questionnaire especially developed for measuring quality of life in patients with vertebral deformities. It consists of 41 questions arranged in five domains: pain, physical function, social function, general health perception, and mental function. The objectives of this study were: (1) to develop a shorter version of the Qualeffo-41 by removing redundant questions; and (2) to investigate the scale characteristics, reliability, and validity of this shorter version.
The study was performed using data from the Qualeffo validation study and the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) study. The analyses were performed in patients with vertebral deformities (n=579). Factor analysis on polychoric correlations and an item response theory (IRT) model, i.e., the generalized partial credit model (GPCM), were used to create a shorter version of Qualeffo-41. Using GPCM, scoring weights were computed for all items.
Three items were removed from the data set because of too many missing values. Factor analysis identified three instead of five domains: (1) pain, (2) physical function, and (3) mental function. Five items had factor loadings <0.4 and were not included in the GPCM. After excluding several items, the domains pain (four items), physical function (18 items), and mental function (nine items) showed a good, reasonable, and excellent fit, respectively. This indicates that the mental function domain and the pain domain are more unidimensional than the physical function domain. All three domains showed a very high correlation (r > or =0.95) with the corresponding domains of the Qualeffo-41.
Qualeffo-31 was developed, consisting of three domains with a reasonable to excellent fit to the GPCM. Although the fit to the GPCM supports the construct validity of the Qualeffo-31, validation in a new study should be performed before using it in practice.
椎体畸形是骨质疏松症的常见后果,已知会降低生活质量。Qualeffo - 41是一种专门为测量椎体畸形患者的生活质量而开发的生活质量问卷。它由41个问题组成,分为五个领域:疼痛、身体功能、社会功能、总体健康感知和心理功能。本研究的目的是:(1)通过去除冗余问题来开发Qualeffo - 41的简短版本;(2)研究这个简短版本的量表特征、信度和效度。
本研究使用了来自Qualeffo验证研究和雷洛昔芬评估多结果(MORE)研究的数据。分析在椎体畸形患者(n = 579)中进行。对多相相关进行因子分析和项目反应理论(IRT)模型,即广义部分计分模型(GPCM),用于创建Qualeffo - 41的简短版本。使用GPCM计算所有项目的计分权重。
由于缺失值过多,从数据集中删除了三个项目。因子分析确定了三个而非五个领域:(1)疼痛,(2)身体功能,和(3)心理功能。五个项目的因子载荷<0.4,未纳入GPCM。排除几个项目后,疼痛领域(四个项目)、身体功能领域(18个项目)和心理功能领域(九个项目)分别显示出良好、合理和优异的拟合度。这表明心理功能领域和疼痛领域比身体功能领域更具单维性。所有三个领域与Qualeffo - 41的相应领域都显示出非常高的相关性(r≥0.95)。
开发了Qualeffo - 31,它由三个领域组成,与GPCM具有合理到优异的拟合度。虽然与GPCM的拟合度支持Qualeffo - 31的结构效度,但在实际应用前应在新的研究中进行验证。