Sujbert László, Rácz Gergely, Szende Béla, Schröder Heinz C, G Müller Werner E, Török Géza
Department of Public Health, Semmelweis University, P.O. Box 370, Budapest H-1445, Hungary.
Toxicology. 2006 Feb 15;219(1-3):106-12. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2005.11.015. Epub 2005 Dec 20.
Mutagenic potential of drinking water samples derived from ranneywells was studied. 100-100 l of untreated (rough) and ozone-treated as well as chlorinated-disinfected water were dropped on and adsorbed by macroreticular resin columns (Serdolit PAD-III and Amberlite XAD-2). The adsorbed material was desorbed by methanol and dichloromethane. After elimination of the solvents by vacuum distillation the adsorbed material was dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide. The mutagenic activity was tested in the Ames-Salmonella/rat liver microsome system. The tester strains were TA-98 and TA-100. The material adsorbed to Serdolit PAD-III from rough and also disinfected water did not induce mutagenicity in case of the TA-98 tester strain, irrespective of activation by liver microsomes. However, the material adsorbed to Amberlite XAD-2 exerted mutagenic effect on the TA-98 tester strain, with and without liver microsome activation, both in case of rough and disinfected water. The TA-100 tester strain showed mutation after, but not without activation, when treated with the material adsorbed by either Serdolit PAD-III or Amberlite XAD-2, in case of rough water. Material derived from disinfected water and adsorbed to Serdolit PAD-III, caused mutation of the TA tester strain also only after activation. The material derived from disinfected water and adsorbed to Amberlite XAD-2 proved to be mutagenic to the TA-100 tester strain both without and after activation. Mutagenic activity was exerted by the amount of concentrates derived from 0.28 to 0.83 l of rough and 0.83-2.5l of disinfected water. The mutagenic activity of drinking water raises the possibility of carcinogenic effect, too. Search for alternative methods of water disinfection may be recommended.
研究了取自集水井的饮用水样本的致突变潜力。将100 - 100升未处理(原水)、经臭氧处理以及氯化消毒的水分别滴加并吸附到大孔网状树脂柱(Serdolit PAD - III和Amberlite XAD - 2)上。吸附的物质用甲醇和二氯甲烷解吸。通过减压蒸馏除去溶剂后,将吸附的物质溶解于二甲基亚砜中。在艾姆斯 - 沙门氏菌/大鼠肝微粒体系统中测试致突变活性。测试菌株为TA - 98和TA - 100。对于TA - 98测试菌株,无论是否经肝微粒体激活,从原水和消毒水中吸附到Serdolit PAD - III上的物质均未诱导致突变性。然而,无论是否经肝微粒体激活,从原水和消毒水中吸附到Amberlite XAD - 2上的物质对TA - 98测试菌株均有致突变作用。对于原水,当用吸附在Serdolit PAD - III或Amberlite XAD - 2上的物质处理时,TA - 100测试菌株仅在激活后而非未激活时出现突变。从消毒水中吸附到Serdolit PAD - III上的物质也仅在激活后导致TA测试菌株发生突变。从消毒水中吸附到Amberlite XAD - 2上的物质无论是否激活均对TA - 100测试菌株具有致突变性。0.28至0.83升原水和0.83 - 2.5升消毒水浓缩物具有致突变活性。饮用水的致突变活性也增加了致癌作用的可能性。建议寻找替代的水消毒方法。