Keil J E, Sutherland S E, Knapp R G, Tyroler H A
Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Systems Science, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425-2239.
Am J Public Health. 1992 Aug;82(8):1133-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.8.1133.
Although concerns have been expressed that mortality from coronary disease and all other causes is greater among Blacks than Whites, we hypothesized that, when socioeconomic status is adequately considered, mortality inequalities between Blacks and Whites are insignificant. The study population was a random sampling of Black and White men who were 35 years of age or older when recruited into the Charleston Heart Study in 1960. Education level and occupational status at baseline were used to compare mortality over the ensuing 28 years between Black and White men, who were classified as low or high socioeconomic status. In no instance were Black-White differences in all-cause or coronary disease mortality rates significantly different when socioeconomic status was controlled. We conclude that socioeconomic status is an important predictor of mortality and that, when socioeconomic status is considered, differences in Black-White mortality rates may be small.
尽管有人担心黑人因冠心病及所有其他原因导致的死亡率高于白人,但我们推测,当充分考虑社会经济地位时,黑人和白人之间的死亡率不平等并不显著。研究人群是1960年被纳入查尔斯顿心脏研究时年龄在35岁及以上的黑人和白人男性的随机样本。基线时的教育水平和职业状况被用于比较随后28年中社会经济地位被划分为低或高的黑人和白人男性的死亡率。在控制了社会经济地位的情况下,全因死亡率或冠心病死亡率的黑白差异在任何情况下都没有显著不同。我们得出结论,社会经济地位是死亡率的一个重要预测因素,并且,当考虑社会经济地位时,黑白死亡率的差异可能很小。