Klugkist Irene, Laudy Olav, Hoijtink Herbert
Department of Methodology and Statistics, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Psychol Methods. 2005 Dec;10(4):477-93. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.477.
Researchers often have one or more theories or expectations with respect to the outcome of their empirical research. When researchers talk about the expected relations between variables if a certain theory is correct, their statements are often in terms of one or more parameters expected to be larger or smaller than one or more other parameters. Stated otherwise, their statements are often formulated using inequality constraints. In this article, a Bayesian approach to evaluate analysis of variance or analysis of covariance models with inequality constraints on the (adjusted) means is presented. This evaluation contains two issues: estimation of the parameters given the restrictions using the Gibbs sampler and model selection using Bayes factors in the case of competing theories. The article concludes with two illustrations: a one-way analysis of covariance and an analysis of a three-way table of ordered means.
研究人员通常对其实证研究的结果有一个或多个理论或预期。当研究人员讨论如果某个理论正确时变量之间的预期关系时,他们的陈述通常是关于一个或多个参数预期大于或小于一个或多个其他参数。换句话说,他们的陈述通常是使用不等式约束来表述的。在本文中,提出了一种贝叶斯方法,用于评估在(调整后的)均值上具有不等式约束的方差分析或协方差分析模型。这种评估包含两个问题:在使用吉布斯采样器给出限制的情况下估计参数,以及在存在竞争理论的情况下使用贝叶斯因子进行模型选择。本文最后给出了两个示例:单向协方差分析和有序均值的三维表分析。