• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童过敏性接触性皮炎:皮炎模式是否应决定转诊?对1995年至2004年间在英国一家中心接受检测的500名儿童进行的回顾性研究。

Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre.

作者信息

Clayton T H, Wilkinson S M, Rawcliffe C, Pollock B, Clark S M

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX, UK.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jan;154(1):114-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06845.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06845.x
PMID:16403103
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) increases with age, and a prevalence of between 13.3% and 24.5% has been reported. Patch testing infants may be particularly difficult, and false-positive reactions may occur.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine whether the site of primary dermatitis in children could predict a diagnosis of ACD. The current frequency of sensitization in children was also evaluated and the main sensitizing substances among children were verified.

METHODS

Between 1995 and 2004, 500 children were patch tested and entered on to the patch test database at Leeds General Infirmary. Analysis of the database included identifying the presenting patterns of eczema and reviewing the patch test results for each child.

RESULTS

Of the children, 133 (27%) had one or more positive patch test result. The effect of age on the likelihood of a positive patch test was highly significant (P < 0.001). Girls were significantly more likely to have a positive patch test compared with boys: odds ratio for a positive test 0.62 (95% confidence interval 0.41-0.95; P = 0.029). Type IV allergy to nickel (33%) was the most frequent finding. Reactions to fragrance mix (18%), cobalt (11%), mercapto chemicals, Myroxylon pereirae and p-phenylenediamine (each 8%) were the next most common. No statistical significance was found in the relationship between the site of primary dermatosis and a positive patch test result.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of presenting dermatitis in children should not determine referral for patch testing. Any child with persistent eczema should be referred for patch testing.

摘要

背景

过敏性接触性皮炎(ACD)的发病率随年龄增长而升高,据报道患病率在13.3%至24.5%之间。对婴儿进行斑贴试验可能特别困难,且可能出现假阳性反应。

目的

本回顾性研究旨在确定儿童原发性皮炎的部位是否可预测ACD的诊断。同时评估了儿童目前的致敏频率,并验证了儿童中的主要致敏物质。

方法

1995年至2004年间,500名儿童在利兹综合医院接受了斑贴试验并录入斑贴试验数据库。对数据库的分析包括确定湿疹的表现模式以及复查每个儿童的斑贴试验结果。

结果

在这些儿童中,133名(27%)有一项或多项斑贴试验结果呈阳性。年龄对斑贴试验阳性可能性的影响非常显著(P<0.001)。与男孩相比,女孩斑贴试验呈阳性的可能性显著更高:阳性试验的比值比为0.62(95%置信区间0.41 - 0.95;P = 0.029)。对镍的IV型过敏(33%)是最常见的发现。对香料混合物(18%)、钴(11%)、巯基化学品、秘鲁香脂和对苯二胺(各8%)的反应是其次最常见的。原发性皮肤病部位与斑贴试验阳性结果之间的关系未发现统计学意义。

结论

儿童皮炎的表现模式不应决定是否转诊进行斑贴试验。任何患有持续性湿疹的儿童都应转诊进行斑贴试验。

相似文献

1
Allergic contact dermatitis in children: should pattern of dermatitis determine referral? A retrospective study of 500 children tested between 1995 and 2004 in one U.K. centre.儿童过敏性接触性皮炎:皮炎模式是否应决定转诊?对1995年至2004年间在英国一家中心接受检测的500名儿童进行的回顾性研究。
Br J Dermatol. 2006 Jan;154(1):114-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06845.x.
2
Contact allergy in children referred for patch testing: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 2001-2004.转诊进行斑贴试验的儿童中的接触性过敏:北美接触性皮炎组数据,2001 - 2004年
Arch Dermatol. 2008 Oct;144(10):1329-36. doi: 10.1001/archderm.144.10.1329.
3
Which children should we patch test?我们应该对哪些儿童进行斑贴试验?
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2007 Jan;32(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2006.02232.x. Epub 2006 Sep 27.
4
Prevalence and relevance of contact dermatitis allergens: a meta-analysis of 15 years of published T.R.U.E. test data.接触性皮炎变应原的患病率及相关性:对15年已发表的TRUE试验数据的荟萃分析
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2004 Sep;51(3):349-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2003.11.069.
5
Contact allergy in eczema patients in Thammasat University Hospital.泰国国立法政大学医院湿疹患者的接触性过敏
J Med Assoc Thai. 2010 Dec;93 Suppl 7:S7-14.
6
Patch tests in children with suspected allergic contact dermatitis: a prospective study and review of the literature.疑似过敏性接触性皮炎儿童的斑贴试验:一项前瞻性研究及文献综述
Dermatology. 2009;218(2):119-25. doi: 10.1159/000165629. Epub 2008 Oct 22.
7
Frequency of contact allergy in German children and adolescents patch tested between 1995 and 2002: results from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology and the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group.1995年至2002年间接受斑贴试验的德国儿童和青少年接触性过敏的发生率:来自皮肤科部门信息网络和德国接触性皮炎研究小组的结果
Contact Dermatitis. 2004 Sep;51(3):111-7. doi: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2004.00411.x.
8
Allergic contact dermatitis in 136 children patch tested between 2000 and 2006.2000年至2006年间对136名儿童进行斑贴试验,检测变应性接触性皮炎。
Int J Dermatol. 2009 Mar;48(3):271-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2009.03890.x.
9
Contact allergy and allergic contact dermatitis in children - a review of current data.儿童接触过敏和过敏性接触性皮炎——当前数据综述。
Contact Dermatitis. 2011 Nov;65(5):254-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0536.2011.01963.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
Patch tests in children: a review of 13 years of experience in comparison with previous data.儿童斑贴试验:与既往数据对比的13年经验回顾
Pediatr Dermatol. 2010 May-Jun;27(3):255-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2010.01128.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prevalence of Contact Allergy to Neomycin in Dermatitis Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.皮炎患者中对新霉素接触性过敏的患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Contact Dermatitis. 2025 Jul;93(1):1-15. doi: 10.1111/cod.14784. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Patch Test Results of 276 Cases with Footwear Dermatitis - A Retrospective Study from a Tertiary Care Centre in South India.276例鞋类皮炎患者的斑贴试验结果——来自印度南部一家三级护理中心的回顾性研究
Indian Dermatol Online J. 2020 Sep 19;11(5):720-724. doi: 10.4103/idoj.IDOJ_560_19. eCollection 2020 Sep-Oct.
3
Combined Assessment of Preschool Childrens' Exposure to Substances in Household Products.
综合评估学前儿童接触家用产品中物质的情况。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Feb 28;16(5):733. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16050733.
4
European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies (ESSCA): Contact allergies in relation to body sites in patients with allergic contact dermatitis.欧洲接触过敏监测系统(ESSCA):接触过敏与过敏性接触性皮炎患者的身体部位的关系。
Contact Dermatitis. 2019 May;80(5):263-272. doi: 10.1111/cod.13192. Epub 2019 Jan 14.
5
Contact Dermatitis in Atopic Dermatitis Children-Past, Present, and Future.特应性皮炎儿童的接触性皮炎:过去、现在和未来。
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019 Feb;56(1):86-98. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8711-2.
6
Effect of Fixed Metallic Oral Appliances on Oral Health.固定金属口腔矫治器对口腔健康的影响。
J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2018 Mar-Apr;8(2):93-98. doi: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_416_17. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
7
Health Risk Assessment on Hazardous Ingredients in Household Deodorizing Products.家用除臭产品中有害物质健康风险评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Apr 13;15(4):744. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15040744.
8
[Basis for the treatment of eczematous diseases in otorhinolaryngology].
HNO. 2017 Oct;65(10):826-833. doi: 10.1007/s00106-017-0383-3.
9
Patch testing in Iranian children with allergic contact dermatitis.伊朗儿童过敏性接触性皮炎的斑贴试验
BMC Dermatol. 2016 Jul 12;16(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12895-016-0047-0.
10
Patch-test results in children and adolescents: systematic review of a 15-year period.儿童和青少年的斑贴试验结果:15年系统综述
An Bras Dermatol. 2016 Jan-Feb;91(1):64-72. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20163927.