• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

争议中的前列腺癌筛查决策:对健康促进实践的启示

Prostate cancer screening decision making under controversy: implications for health promotion practice.

作者信息

Gwede Clement K, McDermott Robert J

机构信息

Department of Interdisciplinary Oncology/Moffitt Cancer Center at the University of South Florida College of Medicine in Tampa, Florida, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jan;7(1):134-46. doi: 10.1177/1524839904263682.

DOI:10.1177/1524839904263682
PMID:16410430
Abstract

Prostate cancer is a major health problem for U.S. men and is characterized by paradoxes and controversies. Despite the wide availability of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test, prostate cancer screening remains a controversial practice mainly because the direct impact of screening on mortality is not yet proven. As the relative value of screening, early detection, and treatment strategies continue to be debated, glaring racial-ethnic disparities persist with African American men experiencing excess morbidity and mortality and demonstrating the lowest screening rates among racial-ethnic groups. Given the prevailing controversy, uncertainty, and known disparities, how can health education messages be framed to assist men and their family members? This article highlights the ethnic disparities, paradoxes, and controversies of prostate cancer and identifies critical challenges and opportunities for health educators and clinical practitioners. Implications for health promotion communications and informed decision making in this era of uncertainty are discussed.

摘要

前列腺癌是美国男性面临的一个主要健康问题,其特点是存在诸多矛盾和争议。尽管前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测广泛可用,但前列腺癌筛查仍是一种有争议的做法,主要原因是筛查对死亡率的直接影响尚未得到证实。随着筛查、早期检测和治疗策略的相对价值不断受到争论,明显的种族差异依然存在,非裔美国男性发病率和死亡率过高,且在各种族群体中筛查率最低。鉴于当前存在的争议、不确定性和已知的差异,如何构建健康教育信息来帮助男性及其家庭成员呢?本文强调了前列腺癌的种族差异、矛盾和争议,并为健康教育工作者和临床从业者确定了关键挑战与机遇。还讨论了在这个不确定性时代对健康促进传播和明智决策的影响。

相似文献

1
Prostate cancer screening decision making under controversy: implications for health promotion practice.争议中的前列腺癌筛查决策:对健康促进实践的启示
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jan;7(1):134-46. doi: 10.1177/1524839904263682.
2
Physician Consultations, Prostate Cancer Knowledge, and PSA Screening of African American Men in the Era of Shared Decision-Making.共同决策时代非裔美国男性的医生咨询、前列腺癌知识与前列腺特异性抗原筛查
Am J Mens Health. 2018 Jul;12(4):751-759. doi: 10.1177/1557988318763673. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
3
Informed consent for cancer screening with prostate-specific antigen: how well are men getting the message?关于前列腺特异性抗原癌症筛查的知情同意:男性对这一信息的了解程度如何?
Am J Public Health. 2003 May;93(5):779-85. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.5.779.
4
Improving knowledge of the prostate cancer screening dilemma among African American men: an academic-community partnership in Washington, DC.提高非裔美国男性对前列腺癌筛查困境的认识:华盛顿特区的学术-社区伙伴关系
Public Health Rep. 2001 Nov-Dec;116(6):590-8. doi: 10.1093/phr/116.6.590.
5
Development of a spiritually based educational intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among church-attending African American men.开发一种基于精神层面的教育干预措施,以提高参加教会活动的非裔美国男性在前列腺癌筛查方面做出明智决策的能力。
J Health Commun. 2009 Sep;14(6):590-604. doi: 10.1080/10810730903120534.
6
Fostering shared decision-making about prostate cancer screening among African American men patients and their primary care providers: a randomized behavioral clinical trial.促进非洲裔美国男性患者及其初级保健提供者就前列腺癌筛查进行共同决策:一项随机行为临床试验。
Trials. 2022 Aug 13;23(1):653. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06605-1.
7
Prostate cancer screening among ethnically diverse first-degree relatives of prostate cancer cases.前列腺癌病例的不同族裔一级亲属中的前列腺癌筛查。
Health Psychol. 2012 Sep;31(5):562-70. doi: 10.1037/a0028626. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
8
Racial disparities in prostate cancer survival in a screened population: Reality versus artifact.在筛查人群中,前列腺癌生存的种族差异:现实与人为。
Cancer. 2018 Apr 15;124(8):1752-1759. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31253. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
9
Prostate cancer screening: a racial dichotomy.
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Sep 27;164(17):1830-2. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.17.1830.
10
Social ecological predictors of prostate-specific antigen blood test and digital rectal examination in black American men.美国黑人男性前列腺特异性抗原血液检测和直肠指检的社会生态预测因素
J Natl Med Assoc. 2006 Apr;98(4):492-504.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge of Prostate Cancer and Screening Among Young Multiethnic Black Men.年轻多族裔黑人男性对前列腺癌及筛查的了解
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jul;11(4):1008-1018. doi: 10.1177/1557988316689497. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
2
Interventions to improve decision making and reduce racial and ethnic disparities in the management of prostate cancer: a systematic review.改善前列腺癌管理中决策制定并减少种族和民族差异的干预措施:系统评价。
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):1068-78. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2086-5.
3
Behind Closed Doors: What Happens when Patients and Providers Talk about Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening?: Survey of the Effects of a Community-Based Intervention.
闭门会议:医患讨论前列腺特异性抗原筛查时会发生什么?:一项基于社区的干预措施效果调查。
Patient. 2009 Sep 1;2(3):191-201. doi: 10.2165/11312730-000000000-00000.
4
Trends in prostate-specific antigen test use, 2000-2005.2000-2005 年前列腺特异性抗原检测的使用趋势。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Mar-Apr;126(2):228-39. doi: 10.1177/003335491112600214.
5
Plans to stop cancer screening tests among adults who recently considered screening.针对近期考虑过筛查的成年人停止癌症筛查测试的计划。
J Gen Intern Med. 2010 Aug;25(8):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1346-5. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
6
Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.视频干预措施提高前列腺特异性抗原检测知情决策适用性的研究
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30529-0.
7
Using focus groups to adapt ethnically appropriate, information-seeking and recruitment messages for a prostate cancer screening program for men at high risk.运用焦点小组来调整适合特定种族的、信息寻求型和招募型信息,用于针对高危男性的前列腺癌筛查项目。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2008 Jun;100(6):674-82. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)31340-7.