• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视频干预措施提高前列腺特异性抗原检测知情决策适用性的研究

Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.

机构信息

Cancer Prevention and Control, Office of Cancer Health Disparities Research, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263, USA.

出版信息

J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30529-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30529-0
PMID:20355352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3711946/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the applicability of an evidence-based video intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men with different levels of health literacy.

METHODS

Forty nine African American men participated in interviewer-administered, pretest and posttest interviews between January and March 2008. Health literacy status was assessed with the Test of Functional Health Literacy in Adults. Repeated measures analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), McNemar or binomial distributions were computed to assess pretest and posttest differences in knowledge. Descriptive statistics were produced to describe participants' perceptions of the information presented in the video.

RESULTS

Results indicated that men with functional health literacy had higher mean levels of prostate cancer screening knowledge at baseline than men with inadequate health literacy. The between-group (F2,44= 4.84; p = .013) and within-group (F1,44 = 5.16; p = .028) test results from repeated-measures ANCOVA indicated that preexisting group differences in prostate cancer knowledge had lessened after intervention exposure. Nearly all men rated the information presented in the video as credible (98%), trustworthy (96%), interesting (100%), understandable (94%), and complete (96%).

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this exploratory study suggest that the video intervention is suitable for use with African American men with different health literacy characteristics in 2 counties in the greater Florida panhandle region. More research is recommended to evaluate the impact of the intervention on men's intentions to undergo screening and actual screening behavior.

摘要

目的

评估基于证据的视频干预措施在促进具有不同健康素养水平的非裔美国男性进行前列腺癌筛查方面的适用性。

方法

49 名非裔美国男性于 2008 年 1 月至 3 月期间参加了访员管理的预测试和后测试访谈。健康素养状况通过成年人功能性健康素养测试进行评估。采用重复测量协方差分析(ANCOVA)、McNemar 或二项式分布来评估知识的前后测差异。采用描述性统计来描述参与者对视频中呈现的信息的看法。

结果

结果表明,具有功能性健康素养的男性在基线时的前列腺癌筛查知识平均水平高于健康素养不足的男性。组间(F2,44=4.84;p=0.013)和组内(F1,44=5.16;p=0.028)重复测量 ANCOVA 的测试结果表明,干预暴露后,前列腺癌知识的预先存在的组间差异已经减小。几乎所有男性都认为视频中呈现的信息具有可信度(98%)、可信赖性(96%)、趣味性(100%)、可理解性(94%)和完整性(96%)。

结论

这项探索性研究的结果表明,该视频干预措施适用于佛罗里达州狭长地带的 2 个县的具有不同健康素养特征的非裔美国男性。建议进行更多的研究来评估该干预措施对男性进行筛查的意愿和实际筛查行为的影响。

相似文献

1
Applicability of a video intervention to increase informed decision making for prostate-specific antigen testing.视频干预措施提高前列腺特异性抗原检测知情决策适用性的研究
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):228-36. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30529-0.
2
Evaluation of a Computer-Based Decision Aid for Promoting Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions Among African American Men: iDecide.评估一款基于计算机的决策辅助工具,以促进非裔美国男性对前列腺癌筛查的知情决策:iDecide。
Am J Health Promot. 2019 Feb;33(2):267-278. doi: 10.1177/0890117118786866. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
3
Preparing African American Men to Make Informed Prostate Cancer Screening Decisions: Development and Pilot Testing of an Interactive Online Decision Aid.准备非裔美国男性做出明智的前列腺癌筛查决策:交互式在线决策辅助工具的开发和试点测试。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 May 5;8(5):e15502. doi: 10.2196/15502.
4
A church-based intervention to promote informed decision making for prostate cancer screening among African American men.基于教堂的干预措施,以促进非裔美国男性进行前列腺癌筛查的知情决策。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2010 Mar;102(3):164-71. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30521-6.
5
Can Women Facilitate Men's Prostate Cancer Screening Informed Decision-Making? The M-PACT Trial.女性能否促进男性前列腺癌筛查的明智决策?M-PACT试验。
J Health Commun. 2017 Dec;22(12):964-973. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2017.1382616. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
6
Educating African American men about the prostate cancer screening dilemma: a randomized intervention.向非裔美国男性宣传前列腺癌筛查困境:一项随机干预研究
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Nov;15(11):2179-88. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0417.
7
Shared decision making for prostate cancer screening: the results of a combined analysis of two practice-based randomized controlled trials.基于实践的两项随机对照试验联合分析:前列腺癌筛查中共同决策的结果。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 13;12:130. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-130.
8
Digital Solutions for Informed Decision Making: An Academic-Community Partnership for the Development of a Prostate Cancer Decision Aid for African American Men.用于明智决策的数字解决方案:学术机构与社区合作开发针对非裔美国男性的前列腺癌决策辅助工具
Am J Mens Health. 2016 May;10(3):207-19. doi: 10.1177/1557988314564178. Epub 2015 Jan 6.
9
Promoting informed prostate cancer screening decision-making for African American men in a community-based setting.在社区环境中促进非裔美国男性进行明智的前列腺癌筛查决策。
Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Apr;33(4):503-514. doi: 10.1007/s10552-021-01544-9. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
10
Informed Decision-Making and Satisfaction with a Church-Based Men's Health Workshop Series for African-American Men: Men-Only vs. Mixed-Gender Format.非裔美国男性参与基于教会的男性健康工作坊系列的知情决策与满意度:仅限男性形式与混合性别形式对比
J Cancer Educ. 2015 Sep;30(3):530-4. doi: 10.1007/s13187-014-0731-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Usability of an Automated System for Real-Time Monitoring of Shared Decision-Making for Surgery: Mixed Methods Evaluation.用于实时监测手术共享决策的自动化系统的可用性:混合方法评估。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Apr 10;11:e46698. doi: 10.2196/46698.
2
Enhancing public awareness and practice of prostate cancer screening among African men: A scoping review.提高非洲男性前列腺癌筛查的公众意识和实践:范围综述。
S Afr Fam Pract (2004). 2023 Jan 17;65(1):e1-e11. doi: 10.4102/safp.v65i1.5621.
3
Content Quality of YouTube Videos About Gestational Diabetes: Systematic Evaluation.关于妊娠期糖尿病的YouTube视频内容质量:系统评价
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Apr 7;7(2):e30156. doi: 10.2196/30156.
4
Health Literacy in African-American Communities: Barriers and Strategies.非裔美国人社区的健康素养:障碍与策略
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Jul 16;4(3):e138-e143. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200617-01.
5
Prostate Cancer Education, Detection, and Follow-Up in a Community-Based Multiethnic Cohort of Medically Underserved Men.在一个以社区为基础的多民族医疗服务不足男性队列中进行前列腺癌教育、检测及随访
Am J Mens Health. 2017 Jan;11(1):82-91. doi: 10.1177/1557988315584794. Epub 2016 Jul 8.
6
Word on the Street: Engaging Local Leaders in a Dialogue About Prostate Cancer Among African Americans.街头热议:让地方领袖参与非裔美国人前列腺癌问题的对话
Am J Mens Health. 2016 Sep;10(5):377-88. doi: 10.1177/1557988314566503. Epub 2015 Jan 15.
7
Do interventions designed to support shared decision-making reduce health inequalities? A systematic review and meta-analysis.旨在支持共同决策的干预措施能否减少健康不平等?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 15;9(4):e94670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094670. eCollection 2014.
8
Health literacy and cancer screening: a systematic review.健康素养与癌症筛查:一项系统综述
Patient Educ Couns. 2014 Feb;94(2):149-57. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
9
Patient-centered discussions about prostate cancer screening: a real-world approach.以患者为中心的前列腺癌筛查讨论:一种现实的方法。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Nov 16;153(10):661-5. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00010.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening and prostate-cancer mortality in a randomized European study.一项欧洲随机研究中的筛查与前列腺癌死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1320-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810084. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
2
Mortality results from a randomized prostate-cancer screening trial.一项前列腺癌随机筛查试验的死亡率结果。
N Engl J Med. 2009 Mar 26;360(13):1310-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810696. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
3
Health literacy skills of U.S. adults.美国成年人的健康素养技能。
Am J Health Behav. 2007 Sep-Oct;31 Suppl 1:S8-18. doi: 10.5555/ajhb.2007.31.supp.S8.
4
Will patients agree to have their literacy skills assessed in clinical practice?患者会同意在临床实践中对其读写能力进行评估吗?
Health Educ Res. 2008 Aug;23(4):603-11. doi: 10.1093/her/cym051. Epub 2007 Sep 22.
5
Cancer mortality in the United States by education level and race.美国按教育水平和种族划分的癌症死亡率。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Sep 19;99(18):1384-94. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm127. Epub 2007 Sep 11.
6
Informed decision making and prostate specific antigen (PSA) testing for prostate cancer: a randomised controlled trial exploring the impact of a brief patient decision aid on men's knowledge, attitudes and intention to be tested.前列腺癌的知情决策与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)检测:一项随机对照试验,探讨简短患者决策辅助工具对男性关于检测的知识、态度及意愿的影响。
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 Nov;63(3):367-79. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.005. Epub 2006 Jul 27.
7
Literacy, race, and PSA level among low-income men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer.新诊断为前列腺癌的低收入男性的识字率、种族与前列腺特异性抗原水平
Urology. 2006 Jul;68(1):89-93. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.01.064.
8
Prostate cancer screening decision making under controversy: implications for health promotion practice.争议中的前列腺癌筛查决策:对健康促进实践的启示
Health Promot Pract. 2006 Jan;7(1):134-46. doi: 10.1177/1524839904263682.
9
Prostate cancer knowledge and beliefs among Black and White older men in rural and urban counties.城乡县份中黑人和白人老年男性的前列腺癌知识与信念
J Cancer Educ. 2005 Summer;20(2):96-102. doi: 10.1207/s15430154jce2002_10.
10
Health care provider-directed intervention to increase colorectal cancer screening among veterans: results of a randomized controlled trial.医疗服务提供者主导的干预措施以提高退伍军人的结直肠癌筛查率:一项随机对照试验的结果
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 1;23(7):1548-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.049.