• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

个体回忆中检索线索的时机和特征的影响:模仿协作回忆中交叉提示的尝试。

Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.

作者信息

Andersson Jan, Hitch Graham, Meudell Peter

机构信息

Division of Command and Control, Department of Man-System-Interaction, FOI, Linköping, Sweden.

出版信息

Memory. 2006 Jan;14(1):94-103. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000557.

DOI:10.1080/09658210444000557
PMID:16423746
Abstract

Inhibitory effects in collaborative recall have been attributed to cross-cueing among partners, in the same way that part-set cues are known to impair recall in individuals. However, studies of part-set cueing in individuals typically involve presenting cues visually at the start of recall, whereas cross-cueing in collaboration is likely to be spoken and distributed over time. In an attempt to bridge this gap, three experiments investigated effects of presenting spoken part-set or extra-list cues at different times during individual recall. Cues had an inhibitory effect on recollection in the early part of the recall period, especially when presented in immediate succession at the start of recall. There was no difference between the effects of part-set and extra-list cues under these presentation conditions. However, more inhibition was generated by part-set than extra-list cues when cue presentation was distributed throughout recall. These results are interpreted as suggesting that cues presented during recall disrupt memory in two ways, corresponding to either blocking or modifying retrieval processes. Implications for explaining and possibly ameliorating inhibitory effects in collaborative recall are discussed.

摘要

协同回忆中的抑制效应被归因于伙伴之间的交叉提示,就像部分线索已知会损害个体的回忆一样。然而,个体中部分线索提示的研究通常涉及在回忆开始时以视觉方式呈现线索,而协同中的交叉提示很可能是口头的且随时间分布。为了弥合这一差距,三项实验研究了在个体回忆的不同时间呈现口头部分线索或列表外线索的效果。线索在回忆期的早期对回忆有抑制作用,尤其是在回忆开始时连续呈现时。在这些呈现条件下,部分线索和列表外线索的效果没有差异。然而,当线索呈现分布在整个回忆过程中时,部分线索比列表外线索产生的抑制作用更强。这些结果被解释为表明回忆期间呈现的线索以两种方式破坏记忆,分别对应于阻断或修改检索过程。讨论了对解释并可能改善协同回忆中抑制效应的意义。

相似文献

1
Effects of the timing and identity of retrieval cues in individual recall: an attempt to mimic cross-cueing in collaborative recall.个体回忆中检索线索的时机和特征的影响:模仿协作回忆中交叉提示的尝试。
Memory. 2006 Jan;14(1):94-103. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000557.
2
Does test delay eliminate collaborative inhibition?测试延迟会消除协同抑制吗?
Memory. 2004 Nov;12(6):722-31. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000521.
3
The joint influence of collaboration and part-set cueing.合作与部分线索提示的联合影响。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014 Oct;67(10):1977-85. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.881405. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
4
Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.重复协作检索对个体记忆的影响因回忆任务与识别任务而异。
Memory. 2009 Nov;17(8):840-6. doi: 10.1080/09658210903266931.
5
The role of item similarity in part-list cueing impairment.项目相似性在部分列表提示损伤中的作用。
Memory. 2009 Oct;17(7):697-707. doi: 10.1080/09658210902740886. Epub 2009 Jul 2.
6
Collaborative remembering of emotional events: the case of Rabin's assassination.对情感事件的协同记忆:以拉宾遇刺事件为例。
Memory. 2006 Jan;14(1):46-56. doi: 10.1080/09658210444000502.
7
The influence of learning methods on collaboration: prior repeated retrieval enhances retrieval organization, abolishes collaborative inhibition, and promotes post-collaborative memory.学习方法对协作的影响:预先重复检索增强了检索组织,消除了协作抑制,并促进了协作后的记忆。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2011 Nov;140(4):535-51. doi: 10.1037/a0024308.
8
Enhancing the comparability between part-list cueing and collaborative recall: a gradual part-list cueing paradigm.增强部分列表线索提示与协作回忆之间的可比性:一种渐进式部分列表线索提示范式。
Exp Psychol. 2012;59(4):199-205. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000144.
9
Examining variation in working memory capacity and retrieval in cued recall.研究线索回忆中工作记忆容量和检索的差异。
Memory. 2009 May;17(4):386-96. doi: 10.1080/09658210902802959.
10
The development of automatic and controlled inhibitory retrieval processes in true and false recall.自动和控制抑制检索过程在真和假回忆中的发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 May;109(1):91-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Modeling collaborative memory with SAM.使用SAM对协作记忆进行建模。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1245-1258. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01647-z. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Collaborative encoding with a new categorization task: a contribution to collaborative memory research.协作编码与新的分类任务:对协作记忆研究的贡献。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1339-1351. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01929-w. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Empirical factors affecting memory in collaborative versus nominal groups.影响合作组与名义组记忆的实证因素。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 8;14:1214910. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1214910. eCollection 2023.
4
Collaborative inhibition effect: the role of memory task and retrieval method.协同抑制效应:记忆任务和提取方法的作用。
Psychol Res. 2023 Nov;87(8):2548-2558. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01821-z. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
5
Deceitful Hints: a Meta-Analytic Review of the Part-List Cuing Impairment in Recall.欺骗性提示:回忆中部分列表提示损害的元分析综述
Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Aug;30(4):1243-1272. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02263-9. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
6
Younger and older adults' collaborative recall of shared and unshared emotional pictures.年轻人和年长者对共享和非共享情感图片的协作回忆。
Mem Cognit. 2017 Jul;45(5):716-730. doi: 10.3758/s13421-017-0694-3.
7
Study repetition and divided attention: effects of encoding manipulations on collaborative inhibition in group recall.研究重复和分散注意:编码操作对组回忆中协作抑制的影响。
Mem Cognit. 2011 Aug;39(6):968-76. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0087-y.
8
Collaborative everyday problem solving among same-gender friends in early and later adulthood.成年早期和晚期同性朋友之间日常问题的协作解决。
Psychol Aging. 2008 Sep;23(3):517-30. doi: 10.1037/a0012830.