O'Donnell L J, Arvind A S, Hoang P, Cameron D, Talbot I C, Jewell D P, Lennard-Jones J E, Farthing M J
Department of Gastroenterology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London.
Gut. 1992 Jul;33(7):947-9. doi: 10.1136/gut.33.7.947.
Corticosteroid or 5-aminosalicylic acid enemas are the treatment of choice for distal ulcerative colitis but up to one third of patients may be unresponsive. As an alternative therapy might be advantageous, the efficacy of six weeks' treatment with 2 g 4-aminosalicylic acid (4-ASA) (n = 24) and 20 mg prednisolone enemas (n = 21) were compared in a double blind, randomised trial in patients with acute distal (less than 30 cm from the anus) ulcerative colitis. Baseline demography and clinical severity were similar in both groups. Five of 24 patients receiving 4-ASA and 4 of 21 receiving prednisolone did not complete the trial because of deteriorating symptoms, failure to improve, or side effects. At the time of leaving the trial, 24 hour stool frequency, the presence of blood in the stools, and histological and sigmoidoscopic appearances were similar in both groups. Symptomatic improvement occurred in 17 of 24 patients receiving 4-ASA compared with 11 of 21 receiving prednisolone (chi 2 = 1.62, NS). Complete symptomatic improvement occurred in 9 of 24 patients receiving 4-ASA compared with 5 of 21 receiving prednisolone (chi 2 = 0.98, NS). Histological improvement was seen in 9 of 24 patients on 4-ASA compared with 7 of 21 on prednisolone (chi 2 = 0.08, NS). One patient receiving 4-ASA was considered to have an idiosyncratic reaction to the drug but other side effects were not considered to be drug related. Thus, 4-ASA, previously used in the treatment of tuberculosis (para-aminosalicyclic acid), is as good as prednisolone in the treatment of distal ulcerative colitis and should be considered in patients unresponsive to steroids or in whom steroid treatment is undesirable.
皮质类固醇或5-氨基水杨酸灌肠剂是远端溃疡性结肠炎的首选治疗方法,但多达三分之一的患者可能无反应。由于替代疗法可能具有优势,因此在一项针对急性远端(距肛门小于30 cm)溃疡性结肠炎患者的双盲随机试验中,比较了2 g 4-氨基水杨酸(4-ASA)(n = 24)和20 mg泼尼松龙灌肠剂(n = 21)六周治疗的疗效。两组的基线人口统计学和临床严重程度相似。24例接受4-ASA治疗的患者中有5例和21例接受泼尼松龙治疗的患者中有4例因症状恶化、未改善或出现副作用而未完成试验。在退出试验时,两组的24小时排便频率、粪便中是否有血以及组织学和乙状结肠镜检查结果相似。接受4-ASA治疗的24例患者中有17例症状改善,而接受泼尼松龙治疗的21例患者中有11例症状改善(χ2 = 1.62,无显著性差异)。接受4-ASA治疗的24例患者中有9例症状完全改善,而接受泼尼松龙治疗的21例患者中有5例症状完全改善(χ2 = 0.98,无显著性差异)。接受4-ASA治疗的24例患者中有9例组织学改善,而接受泼尼松龙治疗的21例患者中有7例组织学改善(χ2 = 0.08,无显著性差异)。1例接受4-ASA治疗的患者被认为对该药物有特异反应,但其他副作用不被认为与药物有关。因此,以前用于治疗结核病(对氨基水杨酸)的4-ASA在治疗远端溃疡性结肠炎方面与泼尼松龙一样有效,对于对类固醇无反应或不适合使用类固醇治疗的患者应考虑使用。