Stephan Wolfgang, Song Yun S, Langley Charles H
Section of Evolutionary Biology, Biocenter, University of Munich, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Genetics. 2006 Apr;172(4):2647-63. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.050179. Epub 2006 Feb 1.
We analyzed a three-locus model of genetic hitchhiking with one locus experiencing positive directional selection and two partially linked neutral loci. Following the original hitchhiking approach by Maynard Smith and Haigh, our analysis is purely deterministic. In the first half of the selected phase after a favored mutation has entered the population, hitchhiking may lead to a strong increase of linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the two neutral sites if both are <0.1 s away from the selected site (where s is the selection coefficient). In the second half of the selected phase, the main effect of hitchhiking is to destroy LD. This occurs very quickly (before the end of the selected phase) when the selected site is between both neutral loci. This pattern cannot be attributed to the well-known variation-reducing effect of hitchhiking but is a consequence of secondary hitchhiking effects on the recombinants created in the selected phase. When the selected site is outside the neutral loci (which are, say, <0.1s apart), however, a fast decay of LD is observed only if the selected site is in the immediate neighborhood of one of the neutral sites (i.e., if the recombination rate r between the selected site and one of the neutral sites satisfies r<<0.1 s). If the selected site is far away from the neutral sites (say, r > 0.3 s), the decay rate of LD approaches that of neutrality. Averaging over a uniform distribution of initial gamete frequencies shows that the expected LD at the end of the hitchhiking phase is driven toward zero, while the variance is increased when the selected site is well outside the two neutral sites. When the direction of LD is polarized with respect to the more common allele at each neutral site, hitchhiking creates more positive than negative linkage disequilibrium. Thus, hitchhiking may have a distinctively patterned LD-reducing effect, in particular near the target of selection.
我们分析了一个基因搭便车的三基因座模型,其中一个基因座经历正向定向选择,另外两个基因座为部分连锁的中性基因座。遵循梅纳德·史密斯和黑格最初的搭便车方法,我们的分析是完全确定性的。在一个有利突变进入种群后的选择阶段的前半段,如果两个中性位点与选择位点的距离均小于0.1s(其中s为选择系数),基因搭便车可能会导致这两个中性位点之间的连锁不平衡(LD)大幅增加。在选择阶段的后半段,基因搭便车的主要作用是破坏LD。当选择位点位于两个中性基因座之间时,这种情况会很快发生(在选择阶段结束之前)。这种模式不能归因于众所周知的基因搭便车导致变异减少的效应,而是选择阶段产生的重组体上二次搭便车效应的结果。然而,当选择位点在中性基因座之外(比如说,它们之间的距离小于0.1s)时,只有当选择位点紧邻其中一个中性位点时(即,如果选择位点与其中一个中性位点之间的重组率r满足r << 0.1s),才会观察到LD的快速衰减。如果选择位点远离中性位点(比如说,r > 0.3s),LD的衰减率接近中性状态。对初始配子频率的均匀分布进行平均表明,在搭便车阶段结束时,预期的LD趋向于零,而当选择位点远在两个中性位点之外时,方差会增加。当LD的方向相对于每个中性位点上更常见的等位基因呈极化时,基因搭便车产生的正向连锁不平衡比负向连锁不平衡更多。因此,基因搭便车可能具有独特模式的LD减少效应,特别是在选择目标附近。