Loret J F, Robert S, Thomas V, Cooper A J, McCoy W F, Lévi Y
Suez Environnement, Cirsee, 38 rue du President Wilson, 78230 Le pecq, France.
J Water Health. 2005 Dec;3(4):423-33. doi: 10.2166/wh.2005.047.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of different disinfectants applicable to Legionella control in domestic water systems. A domestic water supply simulation unit that allowed simulation of real-world conditions was developed for this purpose. The system, consisting of seven identical rigs, was used to compare treatment efficiency under equivalent conditions of system design, materials, hydraulics, water quality, temperature and initial contamination. During the study, each of six loops received continuous application of one of the following disinfectants: chlorine, electro-chlorination, chlorine dioxide, monochloramine, ozone, or copper/silver. The seventh loop was used as a control and remained untreated. Performance evaluation of these disinfectants was based on their ability to reduce not only Legionella, but also protozoa and biofilms, which contribute to the establishment and dissemination of these bacteria in water systems, and their resistance to treatments. Regarding these criteria, chlorine dioxide and chlorine (as bleach or obtained by electro-chlorination) were the most effective treatments in this study. However, in comparison with chlorine, chlorine dioxide showed a longer residual activity in the system, which constituted an advantage in the perspective of an application to extensive pipework systems.
本研究的目的是比较适用于家庭供水系统中军团菌控制的不同消毒剂的效率。为此开发了一个能够模拟实际情况的家庭供水模拟装置。该系统由七个相同的装置组成,用于在系统设计、材料、水力、水质、温度和初始污染等等效条件下比较处理效率。在研究过程中,六个回路中的每一个都持续施加以下消毒剂之一:氯、电解氯化、二氧化氯、一氯胺、臭氧或铜/银。第七个回路用作对照,不进行处理。这些消毒剂的性能评估基于它们不仅能减少军团菌,还能减少原生动物和生物膜的能力,原生动物和生物膜有助于这些细菌在水系统中的定植和传播,以及它们对处理的抗性。就这些标准而言,二氧化氯和氯(作为漂白剂或通过电解氯化获得)是本研究中最有效的处理方法。然而,与氯相比,二氧化氯在系统中显示出更长的残留活性,从应用于广泛的管道系统的角度来看,这是一个优势。