Goyens P L L, Mensink R P
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2006 Aug;60(8):978-84. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602408. Epub 2006 Feb 15.
To compare the effects of alpha-linolenic acid (ALA, C18:3n-3) to those of eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, C20:5n-3) plus docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, C22:6n-3) on cardiovascular risk markers in healthy elderly subjects.
A randomized double-blind nutritional intervention study.
Department of Human Biology, Maastricht University, the Netherlands.
Thirty-seven mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects, 14 men and 23 women aged between 60 and 78 years.
During a run-in period of 3 weeks, subjects consumed an oleic acid-rich diet. The following 6 weeks, 10 subjects remained on the control diet, 13 subjects consumed an ALA-rich diet (6.8 g/day) and 14 subjects an EPA/DHA-rich diet (1.05 g EPA/day + 0.55 g DHA/day).
Both n-3 fatty acid diets did not change concentrations of total-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triacylglycerol and apoA-1 when compared with the oleic acid-rich diet. However, after the EPA/DHA-rich diet, LDL-cholesterol increased by 0.39 mmol/l (P = 0.0323, 95% CI (0.030, 0.780 mmol/l)) when compared with the ALA-rich diet. Intake of EPA/DHA also increased apoB concentrations by 14 mg/dl (P = 0.0031, 95% CI (4, 23 mg/dl)) and 12 mg/dl (P = 0.005, 95% CI (3, 21 mg/dl)) versus the oleic acid and ALA-rich diet, respectively. Except for an EPA/DHA-induced increase in tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI) of 14.6% (P = 0.0184 versus ALA diet, 95% CI (1.5, 18.3%)), changes in markers of hemostasis and endothelial integrity did not reach statistical significance following consumption of the two n-3 fatty acid diets.
In healthy elderly subjects, ALA might affect concentrations of LDL-cholesterol and apoB more favorably than EPA/DHA, whereas EPA/DHA seems to affect TFPI more beneficially.
比较α-亚麻酸(ALA,C18:3n-3)与二十碳五烯酸(EPA,C20:5n-3)加二十二碳六烯酸(DHA,C22:6n-3)对健康老年受试者心血管风险标志物的影响。
一项随机双盲营养干预研究。
荷兰马斯特里赫特大学人类生物学系。
37名轻度高胆固醇血症受试者,14名男性和23名女性,年龄在60至78岁之间。
在为期3周的导入期内,受试者食用富含油酸的饮食。在接下来的6周里,10名受试者继续食用对照饮食,13名受试者食用富含ALA的饮食(6.8克/天),14名受试者食用富含EPA/DHA的饮食(1.05克EPA/天 + 0.55克DHA/天)。
与富含油酸的饮食相比,两种n-3脂肪酸饮食均未改变总胆固醇、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、三酰甘油和载脂蛋白A-1的浓度。然而,与富含ALA的饮食相比,食用富含EPA/DHA的饮食后,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇升高了0.39毫摩尔/升(P = 0.0323,95%置信区间(0.030,0.780毫摩尔/升))。与富含油酸和ALA的饮食相比,摄入EPA/DHA还分别使载脂蛋白B浓度升高了14毫克/分升(P = 0.0031,95%置信区间(4,23毫克/分升))和12毫克/分升(P = 0.005,95%置信区间(3,21毫克/分升))。除了EPA/DHA使组织因子途径抑制剂(TFPI)增加14.6%(与ALA饮食相比,P = 0.0184,95%置信区间(1.5,18.3%))外,食用两种n-3脂肪酸饮食后,止血和内皮完整性标志物的变化未达到统计学显著性。
在健康老年受试者中,ALA对低密度脂蛋白胆固醇和载脂蛋白B浓度的影响可能比EPA/DHA更有利,而EPA/DHA似乎对TFPI的影响更有益。