Müller M J, Mazanek M, Weibrich C, Dellani P R, Stoeter P, Fellgiebel A
Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Germany.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Feb;27(2):440-6.
For adequate interpretation of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters empirical distribution characteristics, precision, and reproducibility should be known. The present study investigated distribution and reliability parameters of hippocampal fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD).
FA and MD values were averaged in hippocampal regions of interest in 20 subjects (10 women and 10 men; age range, 25-69 years). Regions of interest were manually placed bilaterally by one investigator at 2 occasions, and by a second independent investigator. Sample distributions of FA and MD values were compared with normal distributions. Intraclass coefficients (ICCs), standard errors of measurement (SEMs), and coefficients of variation (CVs) with confidence intervals (CI95s) were computed.
The results did not show any deviation of averaged FA (0.237 +/- 0.017) and MD (775 +/- 28 microm2/s) values from normal distribution. Intraobserver reliability (ICC > or = 0.90) and precision (CV < or = 3.5%) were high for all measures. Interobserver reliability reached values of ICC > or = 0.84 and CV < or = 4.1%. FA yielded lower precision (CV 2.2-4.1%) than MD (CV 1.3-2.5%), CI95s were around +/-0.015-0.020 and +/-25-30 microm2/s for FA and MD, respectively. FA differences of 0.020-0.030 and MD differences of 40-50 microm2/s can be assumed to reflect reliably distinct values in hippocampal regions.
The results are in line with previous reports on reliability of DTI measures by using different designs and methodology. Notwithstanding the difficulties associated with region of interest-derived DTI measurements in hippocampal regions, the present approach provides estimates of distribution characteristics and precision applicable to routine assessments of DTI parameters in clinical and research context.
为了充分解读扩散张量成像(DTI)参数,应了解其经验分布特征、精度和可重复性。本研究调查了海马区分数各向异性(FA)和平均扩散率(MD)的分布及可靠性参数。
对20名受试者(10名女性和10名男性;年龄范围25 - 69岁)海马区感兴趣区域的FA和MD值进行平均。感兴趣区域由一名研究人员分两次双侧手动放置,另一名独立研究人员也进行同样操作。将FA和MD值的样本分布与正态分布进行比较。计算组内相关系数(ICC)、测量标准误差(SEM)以及带有95%置信区间(CI95)的变异系数(CV)。
平均FA(0.237±0.017)和MD(775±28μm²/s)值未显示出与正态分布有任何偏差。所有测量的观察者内可靠性(ICC≥0.90)和精度(CV≤3.5%)都很高。观察者间可靠性达到ICC≥0.84且CV≤4.1%。FA的精度(CV 2.2 - 4.1%)低于MD(CV 1.3 - 2.5%),FA和MD的CI95分别约为±0.015 - 0.020和±25 - 30μm²/s。可以认为FA差异0.020 - 0.030和MD差异40 - 50μm²/s能可靠地反映海马区不同的值。
结果与之前使用不同设计和方法对DTI测量可靠性的报告一致。尽管在海马区进行基于感兴趣区域的DTI测量存在困难,但本方法提供了适用于临床和研究环境中DTI参数常规评估的分布特征和精度估计。