Sarrazin Christoph, Gärtner Barbara C, Sizmann Dorothea, Babiel Rainer, Mihm Ulrike, Hofmann Wolf Peter, von Wagner Michael, Zeuzem Stefan
Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Kirrberger Str., D-66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
J Clin Microbiol. 2006 Mar;44(3):729-37. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.729-737.2006.
The key parameter for diagnosis and management of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is HCV RNA. Standardization of HCV RNA assays to IU is mainly based on genotype 1 panels. Little is known about the variability of commercially available HCV RNA assays for quantification of different genotypes. Two real-time reverse transcription (RT)-PCR assays (COBAS TaqMan HCV Test for use with the High-Pure System [HPS/CTM] and COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HCV Test [CAP/CTM]), one standard RT-PCR assay (COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor 2.0 [CAM]), and one signal amplification assay (Versant Quantitative 3.0 [branched DNA [bDNA]]) were compared for quantification of genotypes 1 to 5 (n = 108). Using CAM as a reference assay for genotype 1-infected patients, the mean interassay differences compared with CAP/CTM, HPS/CTM, and bDNA were 0.16, -0.13, and -0.48 log(10) IU/ml HCV RNA, respectively. Comparison of CAM with CAP/CTM, HPS/CTM, and bDNA for the remaining genotypes showed the following results, respectively: 2a/c, -0.24, -0.78, and -0.49; 2b, -0.21, -0.18, and -0.64; 3a, 0.13, -1.04, and -0.55; 4, -0.52, -1.51, and -0.05; and 5, -0.28, -1.00, and -0.24 log IU/ml HCV RNA. A correct decision for treatment discontinuation in genotype 1 patients at week 12 was possible only when the same assay was used at baseline and week 12. Comparison of CAM with the CAP/CTM assay showed equal quantifications of genotype 1, 2, 3, and 5 samples, while genotype 4 samples were slightly underestimated. For the HPS/CTM assay, a significant underestimation of the HCV RNA concentrations of genotypes 2a/c, 3, 4, and 5 was observed. For the bDNA assay, a constant lower quantification of genotypes 1 to 3 was detected.
丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染诊断和管理的关键参数是HCV RNA。HCV RNA检测方法标准化为国际单位(IU)主要基于1型基因组分型。对于用于不同基因型定量的市售HCV RNA检测方法的变异性了解甚少。比较了两种实时逆转录(RT)-PCR检测方法(用于高纯系统的COBAS TaqMan HCV检测[HPS/CTM]和COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan HCV检测[CAP/CTM])、一种标准RT-PCR检测方法(COBAS Amplicor HCV监测2.0[CAM])和一种信号放大检测方法(Versant定量3.0[分支DNA[bDNA]])对1至5型基因(n = 108)的定量。以CAM作为1型感染患者的参考检测方法,与CAP/CTM、HPS/CTM和bDNA相比,平均批间差异分别为0.16、-0.13和-0.48 log(10) IU/ml HCV RNA。CAM与CAP/CTM、HPS/CTM和bDNA对其余基因型的比较结果分别如下:2a/c型为-0.24、-0.78和-0.49;2b型为-0.21、-0.18和-0.64;3a型为0.13、-1.04和-0.55;4型为-0.52、-1.51和-0.05;5型为-0.28、-1.00和-0.24 log IU/ml HCV RNA。只有在基线和第12周使用相同检测方法时,才有可能正确判断1型患者在第12周是否停止治疗。CAM与CAP/CTM检测方法的比较显示,1、2、3和5型样本的定量结果相同,而4型样本略有低估。对于HPS/CTM检测方法,观察到2a/c、3、4和5型的HCV RNA浓度被显著低估。对于bDNA检测方法,检测到1至3型的定量结果始终较低。