• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The effects of sensorimotor-based intervention versus therapeutic practice on improving handwriting performance in 6- to 11-year-old children.

作者信息

Denton Peggy L, Cope Steven, Moser Christine

机构信息

University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, Health Science Center, Wisconsin 54601, USA.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jan-Feb;60(1):16-27. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.1.16.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.60.1.16
PMID:16541981
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two interventions (sensorimotor and therapeutic practice) on handwriting and selected sensorimotor components in elementary-age children.

METHOD

Thirty-eight children 6 to 11 years of age with handwriting dysfunction but no identified educational need were randomly assigned to one of the two intervention groups or a control group. Intervention groups met four times per week over 5 weeks. Handwriting was measured pre- and postintervention using the Test of Handwriting Skills. Visual perception (motor-reduced), visual-motor integration, proprioception, and in-hand manipulation were also measured.

RESULTS

Children receiving therapeutic practice moderately improved handwriting whereas children receiving sensorimotor intervention declined in handwriting performance. The control group did not change significantly. Sensorimotor impairment was noted at pretest in three or four components and selected sensorimotor component function improved with intervention.

CONCLUSION

Therapeutic practice was more effective than sensorimotor-based intervention at improving handwriting performance. Children who received sensorimotor intervention improved in some sensorimotor components but also experienced a clinically meaningful decline in handwriting performance.

摘要

相似文献

1
The effects of sensorimotor-based intervention versus therapeutic practice on improving handwriting performance in 6- to 11-year-old children.
Am J Occup Ther. 2006 Jan-Feb;60(1):16-27. doi: 10.5014/ajot.60.1.16.
2
Effectiveness of school-based occupational therapy intervention on handwriting.基于学校的职业治疗干预对手写能力的有效性。
Am J Occup Ther. 2002 Jan-Feb;56(1):17-25. doi: 10.5014/ajot.56.1.17.
3
Factors that relate to good and poor handwriting.与书写好坏相关的因素。
Am J Occup Ther. 1996 Oct;50(9):732-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.50.9.732.
4
Developmental skills between kindergarten children with handwriting difficulties in Chinese and/or English.有中文和/或英文书写困难的幼儿园儿童之间的发展技能。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2019 Jun;66(3):292-303. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12550. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
5
Assessing handwriting intervention effectiveness in elementary school students: a two-group controlled study.评估小学生书写干预效果的双组对照研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Jan-Feb;67(1):19-26. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.005470.
6
Cognitive Orientation to (Daily) Occupational Performance intervention leads to improvements in impairments, activity and participation in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder.针对(日常)职业表现的认知取向干预可改善发育性协调障碍儿童的损伤、活动和参与度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(10):979-86. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2015.1070298. Epub 2015 Jul 27.
7
Short-term sensorimotor-based intervention for handwriting performance in elementary school children.基于短期感觉运动的小学儿童书写能力干预措施
Pediatr Int. 2016 Nov;58(11):1118-1123. doi: 10.1111/ped.13004. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
8
Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration (VMI): An Effective Outcome Measure for Handwriting Interventions for Kindergarten, First-Grade, and Second-Grade Students?视觉-运动整合发育测试(VMI):对幼儿园、一年级和二年级学生进行书写干预的有效结果指标?
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Jul-Aug;69(4):6904350010p1-7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.015826.
9
Handwriting development, competency, and intervention.手写能力的发展、水平及干预。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Apr;49(4):312-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00312.x.
10
The influence of ergonomic factors and perceptual-motor abilities on handwriting performance.人体工程学因素和感知运动能力对手写表现的影响。
Am J Occup Ther. 1993 Oct;47(10):919-26. doi: 10.5014/ajot.47.10.919.

引用本文的文献

1
In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Effect of Telerehabilitation on Handwriting Performance in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Randomized Controlled Trial.远程康复对注意力缺陷多动障碍儿童书写能力的影响:随机对照试验
Child Care Health Dev. 2025 Mar;51(2):e70055. doi: 10.1111/cch.70055.
3
Revisiting Handwriting Fundamentals Through an Interdisciplinary Framework.
通过跨学科框架重新审视书写基础。
Malays J Med Sci. 2022 Feb;29(1):18-33. doi: 10.21315/mjms2022.29.1.3. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
4
Why Children With Dyslexia Struggle With Writing and How to Help Them.阅读障碍儿童在写作方面遇到困难的原因及如何帮助他们。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2018 Oct 24;49(4):843-863. doi: 10.1044/2018_LSHSS-DYSLC-18-0024.
5
Dexterity and two-point discrimination of the hand in school-aged children with dysgraphia.书写困难的学龄儿童手部的灵活性和两点辨别觉
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2016 Oct 30;30:434. eCollection 2016.
6
Effects of a classroom-embedded occupational therapist-teacher handwriting program for first-grade students.针对一年级学生的课堂嵌入式职业治疗师 - 教师手写项目的效果
Am J Occup Ther. 2014 Nov-Dec;68(6):690-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2014.011585.
7
Increasing viscosity and inertia using a robotically controlled pen improves handwriting in children.使用机器人控制的笔增加粘度和惯性可改善儿童的书写。
J Child Neurol. 2010 Jun;25(6):674-80. doi: 10.1177/0883073809342592. Epub 2009 Sep 30.