Stewart Ian, Robertson Ivan M, Webb Penelope M, Schluter Philip J, Shaw Glen R
National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, University of Queensland, 39 Kessels Road, Coopers Plains, QLD 4108, Australia.
BMC Dermatol. 2006 Apr 4;6:6. doi: 10.1186/1471-5945-6-6.
Pruritic skin rashes associated with exposure to freshwater cyanobacteria are infrequently reported in the medical and scientific literature, mostly as anecdotal and case reports. Diagnostic dermatological investigations in humans are also infrequently described. We sought to conduct a pilot volunteer study to explore the potential for cyanobacteria to elicit hypersensitivity reactions.
A consecutive series of adult patients presenting for diagnostic skin patch testing at a hospital outpatient clinic were invited to participate. A convenience sample of volunteers matched for age and sex was also enrolled. Patches containing aqueous suspensions of various cyanobacteria at three concentrations were applied for 48 hours; dermatological assessment was made 48 hours and 96 hours after application.
20 outpatients and 19 reference subjects were recruited into the study. A single outpatient produced unequivocal reactions to several cyanobacteria suspensions; this subject was also the only one of the outpatient group with a diagnosis of atopic dermatitis. No subjects in the reference group developed clinically detectable skin reactions to cyanobacteria.
This preliminary clinical study demonstrates that hypersensitivity reactions to cyanobacteria appear to be infrequent in both the general and dermatological outpatient populations. As cyanobacteria are widely distributed in aquatic environments, a better appreciation of risk factors, particularly with respect to allergic predisposition, may help to refine health advice given to people engaging in recreational activities where nuisance cyanobacteria are a problem.
与接触淡水蓝藻相关的瘙痒性皮疹在医学和科学文献中鲜有报道,大多为轶事和病例报告。关于人类的诊断性皮肤病学研究也很少被描述。我们试图开展一项试点志愿者研究,以探索蓝藻引发超敏反应的可能性。
邀请在医院门诊进行诊断性皮肤斑贴试验的一系列成年患者连续参与。还招募了按年龄和性别匹配的便利样本志愿者。将含有三种浓度各种蓝藻水悬浮液的贴片贴敷48小时;在贴敷后48小时和96小时进行皮肤病学评估。
20名门诊患者和19名对照受试者被纳入研究。一名门诊患者对几种蓝藻悬浮液产生了明确反应;该受试者也是门诊组中唯一诊断为特应性皮炎的患者。对照组中没有受试者对蓝藻产生临床上可检测到的皮肤反应。
这项初步临床研究表明,在普通人群和皮肤科门诊患者中,对蓝藻的超敏反应似乎都很少见。由于蓝藻广泛分布于水生环境中,更好地了解风险因素,特别是与过敏易感性相关的因素,可能有助于完善针对在有害蓝藻成为问题的娱乐活动中参与者的健康建议。