Zabalegui A, Escobar M A, Cabrera E, Gual M P, Fortuny M, Mach G, Ginesti M, Narbona P
Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Aten Primaria. 2006 Mar 31;37(5):260-5. doi: 10.1157/13086310.
To determine the efficacy over 12 months of the educational programme on self-care of the elderly (PECA), which covers quality of life, nutritional status, and perceived social support of people over 65 living in their own homes.
Pre-test/post-test experimental study with control group.
Urban population in the Manso Health District (Example, Barcelona), Spain.
Persons over 65 living in their own homes, healthy or with chronic illnesses characteristic of their age, who had a normal score in the Pfeiffer test. A total of 70 subjects (35 per group) were selected and 5 of the control group left the study.
Programme on self-care of the elderly, including education on physical activity, nutrition, and social support.
Dependent variables were quality of life, measured by the Nottingham Health Profile; nutritional status, measured by the Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA); and social support, measured by the Duke-Unk Functional Social Support Scale.
The study sample had an average age of 70.9 (SD, 3.1); 88.2% had self-perception of good health; and 21% lived alone. We only found statistically significant differences between pre- and post-intervention observations in nutritional status (P=.001).
Despite a statistically significant difference in the variable of nutritional status, the difference was not "clinically" relevant. The ineffectiveness of the intervention is due to our starting from a very homogeneous sample, which had good health status and well-established social networks.
确定老年人自我护理教育计划(PECA)在12个月内的效果,该计划涵盖生活质量、营养状况以及居住在家中的65岁以上人群的感知社会支持。
设有对照组的前测/后测实验研究。
西班牙曼索健康区(例如巴塞罗那)的城市人口。
居住在家中的65岁以上人群,健康或患有其年龄阶段常见的慢性疾病,在 Pfeiffer 测试中得分正常。共选取70名受试者(每组35名),对照组中有5人退出研究。
老年人自我护理计划,包括体育活动、营养和社会支持方面的教育。
因变量包括用诺丁汉健康量表测量的生活质量、用简易营养评估量表(MNA)测量的营养状况以及用杜克-UNK 功能性社会支持量表测量的社会支持。
研究样本的平均年龄为70.9岁(标准差为3.1);88.2% 的人自我感觉健康状况良好;21% 的人独居。我们仅发现干预前后营养状况观察值之间存在统计学显著差异(P = 0.001)。
尽管营养状况变量存在统计学显著差异,但该差异不具有“临床”相关性。干预措施无效是因为我们选取的样本非常同质化,健康状况良好且社会网络稳固。