Herzig Martin C, Van Nostrand William E, Jucker Mathias
Department of Cellular Neurology, Hertie-Institute for Clinical Brain Research, University of Tübingen, Germany.
Brain Pathol. 2006 Jan;16(1):40-54. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.2006.tb00560.x.
Cerebral amyloid angiopathy of the beta-amyloid type (Abeta-CAA) is a risk factor for hemorrhagic stroke and independently is believed to contribute to dementia. Naturally occurring animal models of Abeta-CAA are scarce and not well suited for the laboratory. To this end, a variety of transgenic mouse models have been developed that, similar to cerebral Abeta-amyloidosis in humans, develop either Abeta-CAA only or both Abeta-CAA and parenchymal amyloid, or primarily parenchymal amyloid with only scarce Abeta-CAA. The lessons learned from these mouse models are: i) Abeta-CAA alone is sufficient to induce cerebral hemorrhage and associate pathologies including neuroinflammation, ii) the origin of vascular amyloid is mainly neuronal, iii) Abeta-CAA results largely from impaired Abeta clearance, iv) a high ratio Abeta40:42 favors vascular over parenchymal amyloidosis, and v) genetic risk factors such as ApoE modulate Abeta-CAA and CAA-induced hemorrhages. Therapeutic strategies to inhibit Abeta-CAA are poor at the present time. Once Abeta-CAA is present current Abeta immunotherapy strategies have failed to clear vascular amyloid and even run the risk of serious side effects. Despite this progress in deciphering the pathomechanism of Abeta-CAA, with these first generation mouse models of Abeta-CAA, refining these models is needed and will help to understand the emerging importance of Abeta-CAA for dementia and to develop biomarkers and therapeutic strategies.
β-淀粉样蛋白型脑淀粉样血管病(Abeta-CAA)是出血性中风的一个危险因素,并且被认为独立地导致痴呆症。天然存在的Abeta-CAA动物模型很稀少,且不太适合实验室研究。为此,已经开发了多种转基因小鼠模型,这些模型与人类大脑中的Abeta淀粉样变性相似,要么仅发展为Abeta-CAA,要么同时发展为Abeta-CAA和实质淀粉样蛋白,或者主要是实质淀粉样蛋白,仅有少量Abeta-CAA。从这些小鼠模型中学到的经验教训是:i)单独的Abeta-CAA足以诱发脑出血及相关病理变化,包括神经炎症;ii)血管淀粉样蛋白的起源主要是神经元;iii)Abeta-CAA主要是由于Abeta清除受损所致;iv)高比例的Abeta40:42有利于血管而非实质淀粉样变性;v)诸如载脂蛋白E等遗传危险因素会调节Abeta-CAA和CAA诱导的出血。目前抑制Abeta-CAA的治疗策略效果不佳。一旦出现Abeta-CAA,当前的Abeta免疫治疗策略未能清除血管淀粉样蛋白,甚至有产生严重副作用的风险。尽管在解读Abeta-CAA的发病机制方面取得了这些进展,但对于这些第一代Abeta-CAA小鼠模型,仍需要对其进行改进,这将有助于理解Abeta-CAA在痴呆症中的新重要性,并开发生物标志物和治疗策略。