Lyon Pamela
Australian National University/University of Adelaide, 20 Wellesley Avenue, Evandale, SA, 5069, Australia.
Cogn Process. 2006 Mar;7(1):11-29. doi: 10.1007/s10339-005-0016-8. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
After half a century of cognitive revolution we remain far from agreement about what cognition is and what cognition does. It was once thought that these questions could wait until the data were in. Today there is a mountain of data, but no way of making sense of it. The time for tackling the fundamental issues has arrived. The biogenic approach to cognition is introduced not as a solution but as a means of approaching the issues. The traditional, and still predominant, methodological stance in cognitive inquiry is what I call the anthropogenic approach: assume human cognition as the paradigm and work 'down' to a more general explanatory concept. The biogenic approach, on the other hand, starts with the facts of biology as the basis for theorizing and works 'up' to the human case by asking psychological questions as if they were biological questions. Biogenic explanations of cognition are currently clustered around two main frameworks for understanding biology: self-organizing complex systems and autopoiesis. The paper describes the frameworks and infers from them ten empirical principles--the biogenic 'family traits'--that constitute constraints on biogenic theorizing. Because the anthropogenic approach to cognition is not constrained empirically to the same degree, I argue that the biogenic approach is superior for approaching a general theory of cognition as a natural phenomenon.
经过半个世纪的认知革命,我们在认知是什么以及认知有什么作用这两个问题上仍远未达成共识。人们曾经认为,这些问题可以等到数据完备之后再去探讨。如今,数据堆积如山,但却无法从中梳理出头绪。解决这些根本问题的时候已经到了。引入认知的生物起源方法并非作为一种解决方案,而是作为一种探讨这些问题的手段。在认知研究中,传统且仍然占主导地位的方法论立场是我所称的人为起源方法:将人类认知视为范例,并“向下”推导至一个更具普遍性的解释概念。另一方面,生物起源方法则以生物学事实为理论化的基础,通过将心理学问题当作生物学问题来提问,“向上”推导至人类的情况。目前,对认知的生物起源解释主要集中在两个理解生物学的主要框架上:自组织复杂系统和自创生。本文描述了这些框架,并从中推断出十条实证原则——生物起源的“家族特征”——这些原则构成了对生物起源理论化的限制。由于人为起源的认知方法在实证上没有受到同等程度的限制,所以我认为,就探讨作为一种自然现象的认知的一般理论而言,生物起源方法更为优越。