• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

瑞典版癌症呼吸困难量表的验证

Validation of a Swedish version of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale.

作者信息

Henoch Ingela, Bergman Bengt, Gaston-Johansson Fannie

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.02.002.

DOI:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.02.002
PMID:16632083
Abstract

The Cancer Dyspnea Scale (CDS) is a multidimensional measure of dyspnea experience, with three subscales related to sense of effort, sense of anxiety and sense of discomfort, and a total score. In this study, we evaluated the validity and reliability of a Swedish version, the CDS-S, in 99 patients with advanced lung cancer who were not receiving curative or life-prolonging treatments. Criterion-related validity was demonstrated by significant group differences in CDS-S scores when patients were stratified by dyspnea intensity, as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS-D). Correlations between the total CDS-S score and other dyspnea scales varied between 0.63 and 0.68. Convergent validity was shown by comparing the CDS-S subscales with conceptually related measures of physical and emotional function and discomfort, and correlations ranged from 0.34 to 0.57. The CDS-S captured the psychological dimension of dyspnea better than did the VAS-D. Internal consistency of the CDS-S scales was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.90. The CDS-S was well received by the patients and completed in 2 minutes. This study supports the CDS as a valid and reliable instrument to measure dyspnea experience in a palliative setting, well suited for use in research as well as in clinical practice.

摘要

癌症呼吸困难量表(CDS)是一种对呼吸困难体验的多维度测量工具,它有三个与用力感、焦虑感和不适感相关的子量表以及一个总分。在本研究中,我们评估了瑞典语版的CDS(即CDS-S)在99例未接受根治性或延长生命治疗的晚期肺癌患者中的有效性和可靠性。当根据视觉模拟量表(VAS-D)测量的呼吸困难强度对患者进行分层时,CDS-S评分存在显著的组间差异,这证明了与标准相关的有效性。CDS-S总分与其他呼吸困难量表之间的相关性在0.63至0.68之间。通过将CDS-S子量表与身体和情绪功能及不适感的概念相关测量指标进行比较,显示出收敛效度,相关性范围为0.34至0.57。CDS-S比VAS-D能更好地捕捉呼吸困难的心理维度。CDS-S量表的内部一致性通过Cronbach's alpha系数在0.81至0.90之间得到证实。患者对CDS-S接受度良好,且能在2分钟内完成填写。本研究支持CDS作为一种在姑息治疗环境中测量呼吸困难体验的有效且可靠的工具,非常适合用于研究以及临床实践。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Swedish version of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale.瑞典版癌症呼吸困难量表的验证
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.02.002.
2
Assessment of the psychometric properties of an English version of the cancer dyspnea scale in people with advanced lung cancer.评估英文版癌症呼吸困难量表在晚期肺癌患者中的心理测量特性。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Nov;44(5):741-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.027. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
3
Development and validation of the Cancer Dyspnoea Scale: a multidimensional, brief, self-rating scale.癌症呼吸困难量表的编制与验证:一种多维、简短的自评量表。
Br J Cancer. 2000 Feb;82(4):800-5. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.1999.1002.
4
Dyspnea experience in patients with lung cancer in palliative care.姑息治疗中肺癌患者的呼吸困难体验
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Apr;12(2):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
5
Validation of "Cancer Dyspnea Scale" in Patients With Advanced Cancer in a Palliative Care Setting in India.在印度的姑息治疗环境中,对晚期癌症患者的“癌症呼吸困难量表”进行验证。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Nov;54(5):715-720.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
A psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the Cardiac Depression Scale.中文版心脏抑郁量表的心理测量学评估
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Aug;65(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.010.
7
Dyspnea-related anxiety: The Dutch version of the Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire.呼吸困难相关焦虑:呼吸困难信念问卷的荷兰语版。
Chron Respir Dis. 2011;8(1):11-9. doi: 10.1177/1479972310383592. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
8
Measurement of dyspnea in patients treated with mechanical ventilation.机械通气治疗患者的呼吸困难测量
Am J Crit Care. 1999 Jul;8(4):254-61.
9
Understanding the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Turkish cancer patients.了解欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(EORTC QLQ-C30)在土耳其癌症患者中的信度和效度。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jan;17(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00827.x.
10
Assessment of change of quality of life in terminally ill patients under cancer pain management using the EORTC Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in a Korean sample.使用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷(QLQ-C30)对韩国样本中接受癌症疼痛管理的晚期患者的生活质量变化进行评估。
Oncology. 2008;74 Suppl 1:7-12. doi: 10.1159/000143212. Epub 2008 Aug 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Dyspnoea-12: a translation and linguistic validation study in a Swedish setting.呼吸困难-12:瑞典背景下的翻译与语言验证研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014490.
2
Dyspnea review for the palliative care professional: assessment, burdens, and etiologies.姑息治疗专业人员的呼吸困难评估:评估、负担和病因。
J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1167-72. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0109. Epub 2011 Sep 6.