Suppr超能文献

瑞典版癌症呼吸困难量表的验证

Validation of a Swedish version of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale.

作者信息

Henoch Ingela, Bergman Bengt, Gaston-Johansson Fannie

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Caring Sciences, Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.02.002.

Abstract

The Cancer Dyspnea Scale (CDS) is a multidimensional measure of dyspnea experience, with three subscales related to sense of effort, sense of anxiety and sense of discomfort, and a total score. In this study, we evaluated the validity and reliability of a Swedish version, the CDS-S, in 99 patients with advanced lung cancer who were not receiving curative or life-prolonging treatments. Criterion-related validity was demonstrated by significant group differences in CDS-S scores when patients were stratified by dyspnea intensity, as measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS-D). Correlations between the total CDS-S score and other dyspnea scales varied between 0.63 and 0.68. Convergent validity was shown by comparing the CDS-S subscales with conceptually related measures of physical and emotional function and discomfort, and correlations ranged from 0.34 to 0.57. The CDS-S captured the psychological dimension of dyspnea better than did the VAS-D. Internal consistency of the CDS-S scales was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.90. The CDS-S was well received by the patients and completed in 2 minutes. This study supports the CDS as a valid and reliable instrument to measure dyspnea experience in a palliative setting, well suited for use in research as well as in clinical practice.

摘要

癌症呼吸困难量表(CDS)是一种对呼吸困难体验的多维度测量工具,它有三个与用力感、焦虑感和不适感相关的子量表以及一个总分。在本研究中,我们评估了瑞典语版的CDS(即CDS-S)在99例未接受根治性或延长生命治疗的晚期肺癌患者中的有效性和可靠性。当根据视觉模拟量表(VAS-D)测量的呼吸困难强度对患者进行分层时,CDS-S评分存在显著的组间差异,这证明了与标准相关的有效性。CDS-S总分与其他呼吸困难量表之间的相关性在0.63至0.68之间。通过将CDS-S子量表与身体和情绪功能及不适感的概念相关测量指标进行比较,显示出收敛效度,相关性范围为0.34至0.57。CDS-S比VAS-D能更好地捕捉呼吸困难的心理维度。CDS-S量表的内部一致性通过Cronbach's alpha系数在0.81至0.90之间得到证实。患者对CDS-S接受度良好,且能在2分钟内完成填写。本研究支持CDS作为一种在姑息治疗环境中测量呼吸困难体验的有效且可靠的工具,非常适合用于研究以及临床实践。

相似文献

1
Validation of a Swedish version of the Cancer Dyspnea Scale.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2006 Apr;31(4):353-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.02.002.
2
Assessment of the psychometric properties of an English version of the cancer dyspnea scale in people with advanced lung cancer.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2012 Nov;44(5):741-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.10.027. Epub 2012 Jul 4.
4
Dyspnea experience in patients with lung cancer in palliative care.
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2008 Apr;12(2):86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2007.09.006. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
5
Validation of "Cancer Dyspnea Scale" in Patients With Advanced Cancer in a Palliative Care Setting in India.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Nov;54(5):715-720.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Aug 8.
6
A psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the Cardiac Depression Scale.
J Psychosom Res. 2008 Aug;65(2):123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2008.03.010.
7
Dyspnea-related anxiety: The Dutch version of the Breathlessness Beliefs Questionnaire.
Chron Respir Dis. 2011;8(1):11-9. doi: 10.1177/1479972310383592. Epub 2010 Dec 20.
9
Understanding the reliability and validity of the EORTC QLQ-C30 in Turkish cancer patients.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Jan;17(1):98-104. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00827.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Dyspnoea-12: a translation and linguistic validation study in a Swedish setting.
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 6;7(5):e014490. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014490.
2
Dyspnea review for the palliative care professional: assessment, burdens, and etiologies.
J Palliat Med. 2011 Oct;14(10):1167-72. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2011.0109. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验