Bunketorp Lina, Lindh Malin, Carlsson Jane, Stener-Victorin Elisabet
The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Institute of Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Sweden.
Clin Rehabil. 2006 Mar;20(3):201-17. doi: 10.1191/0269215506cr934oa.
To evaluate the effects of a physical training programme which is supervised and tailored to meet the needs of patients with subacute whiplash-associated disorders.
A randomized controlled trial with follow-up at three and nine months after randomization.
An interdisciplinary rehabilitation centre.
Forty-seven patients with subacute disorders following a whiplash trauma.
Patients were randomized to a supervised training group or a self-administered home training group.
Primary outcome measures were the Self-Efficacy Scale, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia and the Pain Disability Index. Secondary outcome measures were neck pain intensity, sensory and affective dimensions of pain, pain location and duration, muscle tenderness, grip strength, cervical mobility, sick leave and analgesic consumption.
Forty patients (85%) completed the intervention period, and the drop-outs were followed up by intention-to-treat. The results showed that supervised training was significantly more favourable than home training, with a more rapid improvement in self-efficacy (P = 0.03), fear of movement/(re)injury (P = 0.03) and pain disability (P = 0.03) at three months. Further, supervised training significantly reduced the frequency of analgesic consumption (P = 0.03). The improvements were partly maintained at nine months, even though there was no amelioration in pain and physical disorders. Despite the favourable outcome, supervised intervention did not reduce sick leave.
The findings indicate a treatment approach that is feasible in the rehabilitation of patients with subacute whiplash-associated disorders in the short term, but additional research is needed to extend these findings and elucidate treatment strategies that also are cost effective.
评估一项有监督且量身定制以满足亚急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者需求的体育训练计划的效果。
一项随机对照试验,随机分组后3个月和9个月进行随访。
一个跨学科康复中心。
47例挥鞭样创伤后患有亚急性疾病的患者。
患者被随机分为有监督训练组或自我实施的家庭训练组。
主要结局指标为自我效能量表、坦帕运动恐惧量表和疼痛残疾指数。次要结局指标为颈部疼痛强度、疼痛的感觉和情感维度、疼痛部位和持续时间、肌肉压痛、握力、颈椎活动度、病假天数和镇痛药消耗量。
40例患者(85%)完成了干预期,对失访患者采用意向性分析进行随访。结果显示,有监督训练比家庭训练明显更有利,3个月时自我效能(P = 0.03)、对运动/(再)损伤的恐惧(P = 0.03)和疼痛残疾(P = 0.03)改善更快。此外,有监督训练显著降低了镇痛药的使用频率(P = 0.03)。尽管疼痛和身体疾病没有改善,但这些改善在9个月时部分得以维持。尽管结果良好,但有监督干预并未减少病假天数。
研究结果表明,一种治疗方法在亚急性挥鞭样损伤相关疾病患者的短期康复中是可行的,但需要进一步研究来扩展这些发现并阐明具有成本效益的治疗策略。