Kuo Ping-Hung, Wu Huey-Dong, Lu Been-Ying, Chen Mei-Tai, Kuo Sow-Hsong, Yang Pan-Chyr
Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei.
J Formos Med Assoc. 2006 May;105(5):390-8. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60135-2.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The rapid shallow breathing index (RSBI) is a weaning parameter usually measured at the start of a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT). This study investigated the value of RSBI measured at the beginning and termination of SBT as a predictor of weaning outcome.
RSBI was measured during the initial 1 minute (RSBI1) and at termination (RSBI2) of an SBT in 172 patients recovering from acute respiratory failure.
Weaning was successful in 106 patients and failed in 66 patients. Among the 66 patients with weaning failure, 12 required reintubation within 48 hours (extubation failure), and the remaining 54 patients could not be extubated after SBT (trial failure). There were no differences between RSBI1 in the three groups (69.4 +/- 27.5, 81.7 +/- 24.4 and 75.5 +/- 26.5, respectively), but RSBI2 was significantly higher in patients with extubation failure (95.9 +/- 20.6) and trial failure (98.0 +/- 50.0) than in patients with weaning success (64.6 +/- 26.3) (both p < 0.001). Logistic regression revealed that RSBI2 was superior to RSBI1 and various physiologic indices in predicting weaning outcome. For the 118 extubated patients, the mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for RSBI2 and RSBI1 was 0.83 and 0.63, respectively. Using a threshold value of 105, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and likelihood ratio for weaning outcome were 0.91, 0.25, 0.85 and 1.38 for RSBI2 and 0.89, 0.16, 0.60 and 1.06 for RSBI1, respectively.
This study found that RSBI measured at the completion of SBT was superior to that measured at the start in predicting weaning outcome in critically ill patients.
背景/目的:快速浅呼吸指数(RSBI)是一种通常在自主呼吸试验(SBT)开始时测量的撤机参数。本研究调查了在SBT开始时和结束时测量的RSBI作为撤机结果预测指标的价值。
对172例急性呼吸衰竭康复患者在SBT的最初1分钟(RSBI1)和结束时(RSBI2)测量RSBI。
106例患者撤机成功,66例患者撤机失败。在66例撤机失败的患者中,12例在48小时内需要重新插管(拔管失败),其余54例患者在SBT后无法拔管(试验失败)。三组患者的RSBI1无差异(分别为69.4±27.5、81.7±24.4和75.5±26.5),但拔管失败患者(95.9±20.6)和试验失败患者(98.0±50.0)的RSBI2显著高于撤机成功患者(64.6±26.3)(均p<0.001)。逻辑回归显示,RSBI2在预测撤机结果方面优于RSBI1和各种生理指标。对于118例已拔管患者,RSBI2和RSBI1的受试者工作特征曲线下平均面积分别为0.83和0.63。使用阈值105时,RSBI2预测撤机结果的敏感性、特异性、准确性和似然比分别为0.91、0.25、0.85和1.38,RSBI1分别为0.89、0.16、0.60和1.06。
本研究发现,在SBT结束时测量的RSBI在预测危重症患者撤机结果方面优于开始时测量的RSBI。