Arbeitsgruppe Pflanzliche Zellphysiologie, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, D-4630 Bochum, Germany.
Plant Physiol. 1978 Jun;61(6):1017-22. doi: 10.1104/pp.61.6.1017.
Seedlings of Triticum aestivum L. and Secale cereale L. were grown in the presence of six different (five having different chemical structures) chlorosis-inducing herbicides: aminotriazole and its derivative SDR 5175, haloxidine, Sandoz 6706, fluometuron, and EMD-IT 5914. Concentrations were applied which allowed the leaves to grow normally and to reach normal total amino nitrogen contents but evoked a complete chlorosis (less than 6% chlorophyll). The effects of the herbicides on the accumulation of several chloroplast constituents and on peroxisomal and mitochondrial marker enzyme activities were compared. Wheat and rye, in general, gave very similar results, wheat being more sensitive to unspecific inhibitory effects.In dark-grown plants, the herbicides had no or only minor effects on the rRNA pattern and on enzyme activities of the leaves. In the light, all herbicides applied prevented the accumulation of carotenoids and of chloroplastic rRNA. Consequently, ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase activity was virtually absent. After all herbicide treatments in light, the leaves contained only rather low catalase activity. In the presence of aminotriazole and haloxidine, the chloroplast-specific NADP-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and the peroxisomal enzymes glycolate oxidase and hydroxypyruvate reductase had high or even normal activities, as in untreated leaves. In leaves treated with Sandoz 6706, fluometuron, or EMDIT 5914, the activities of the latter three enzymes were, in parallel, only very low. Some herbicides interfered with enzyme activities in vitro, particularly with those of catalase and of glycolate oxidase. Among mitochondrial enzymes, cytochrome c oxidase activity was either unaffected or lower, while fumarase had considerably higher activities in the herbicide-treated, as compared to untreated leaves. The specific effects on peroxisomal enzymes cannot be explained by the hypothesis of herbicide-induced photodestructions in carotene-deficient plastids. Alternative explanations for the genesis of the chlorosis are discussed.
小麦和黑麦幼苗在六种不同的(五种具有不同化学结构)引起黄化的除草剂存在下生长:氨基三唑及其衍生物 SDR 5175、哈尔氧定、山德士 6706、氟脲嘧啶和 EMD-IT 5914。应用的浓度允许叶片正常生长并达到正常的总氨基酸氮含量,但引起完全黄化(叶绿素含量低于 6%)。比较了除草剂对几种叶绿体成分的积累和过氧化物酶体和线粒体标记酶活性的影响。一般来说,小麦和黑麦的结果非常相似,小麦对非特异性抑制作用更为敏感。在黑暗生长的植物中,除草剂对 rRNA 模式和叶片酶活性没有或只有较小的影响。在光照下,所有应用的除草剂都阻止类胡萝卜素和叶绿体 rRNA 的积累。因此,核酮糖-1,5-二磷酸羧化酶活性几乎不存在。在光照下进行所有除草剂处理后,叶片仅含有相当低的过氧化氢酶活性。在氨基三唑和哈尔氧定存在下,叶绿体特异性 NADP-甘油醛-3-磷酸脱氢酶和过氧化物酶体酶乙醇酸氧化酶和羟丙酮酸还原酶具有高或甚至正常的活性,如未处理的叶片。在用山德士 6706、氟脲嘧啶或 EMDIT 5914 处理的叶片中,后三种酶的活性非常低。一些除草剂在体外干扰酶活性,特别是过氧化氢酶和乙醇酸氧化酶。在线粒体酶中,细胞色素 c 氧化酶活性不受影响或较低,而在除草剂处理的叶片中,富马酸酶的活性显著较高。对过氧化物酶体酶的特定影响不能用除草剂诱导的类胡萝卜素缺乏质体光破坏的假说来解释。讨论了黄化发生的替代解释。