• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.

作者信息

Higham Philip A, Tam Helen

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Highfield, England.

出版信息

Mem Cognit. 2006 Jan;34(1):148-57. doi: 10.3758/bf03193394.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193394
PMID:16686114
Abstract

Three experiments, using the original encoding-specificity paradigm, investigated the role of study list structure in producing Higham and Tam's (2005) generation failure effect. Generation failure occurs when cued recall performance for strong, extralist cues is worse than target production in a control group that is given no study list but is instead required merely to generate responses to the same test cues. In the present study, generation failure was replicated in Experiment 1, and Experiment 2 demonstrated that strong, extralist cues were more likely to elicit targets in pure generation groups when participants had studied a list of strong associates than when they had studied a list of weak ones. In Experiment 3, participants were released from generation failure when a study list of moderate associates was used and the cue-to-target associative strength was equated between the reinstated- and extralist-cue conditions. Together, these results suggest that generation failure is partly attributable to participants' searching inappropriate domains that, though consistent with the study list structure, are unlikely to contain targets.

摘要

相似文献

1
Release from generation failure: the role of study list structure.
Mem Cognit. 2006 Jan;34(1):148-57. doi: 10.3758/bf03193394.
2
Generation and associative encoding in young and old adults: the effect of the strength of association between cues and targets on a cued recall task.
Exp Psychol. 2008;55(1):23-30. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.55.1.23.
3
Selective access in cued recall: the roles of retrieval cues and domains of encoding.线索回忆中的选择性提取:提取线索与编码领域的作用。
Mem Cognit. 1990 Jan;18(1):15-22. doi: 10.3758/bf03202641.
4
Where is the forgetting with list-method directed forgetting in recognition?在再认中,采用列表法的定向遗忘发生在哪里?
Mem Cognit. 2009 Jun;37(4):464-76. doi: 10.3758/MC.37.4.464.
5
The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.抑制过程在部分线索提示中的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2007 Mar;33(2):335-41. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.335.
6
Can intentional forgetting reduce false memory? Effects of list-level and item-level forgetting.有意遗忘能减少错误记忆吗?列表层面和项目层面遗忘的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2008 Jan;127(1):146-53. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.03.004. Epub 2007 May 1.
7
What is preexisting strength? Predicting free association probabilities, similarity ratings, and cued recall probabilities.什么是先前存在的强度?预测自由联想概率、相似性评级和线索回忆概率。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Aug;12(4):711-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03196762.
8
Part-list cuing can be transient and lasting: the role of encoding.部分列表提示可以是短暂的和持久的:编码的作用。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2006 Jan;32(1):33-43. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.1.33.
9
Recency effects in direct and indirect memory tasks.直接和间接记忆任务中的近因效应。
Mem Cognit. 1991 Jul;19(4):321-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03197135.
10
The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: blocking or partial activation?
Mem Cognit. 1992 Nov;20(6):715-26. doi: 10.3758/bf03202721.

引用本文的文献

1
Recallable but not recognizable: The influence of semantic priming in recall paradigms.可召回但不可识别:在回忆范式中语义启动的影响。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb;21(1):119-143. doi: 10.3758/s13415-020-00854-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
Not all errors are created equal: metacognition and changing answers on multiple-choice tests.
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Mar;59(1):28-34. doi: 10.1037/h0087457.
2
Encoding specificity manipulations do affect retrieval from memory.编码特异性操作确实会影响从记忆中的检索。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2005 May;119(1):107-21. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.12.001. Epub 2005 Jan 8.
3
Illusory recollection and dual-process models of recognition memory.错误记忆与识别记忆的双加工模型
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2004 May;57(4):714-44. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000468.
4
Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited.
Mem Cognit. 2002 Jan;30(1):67-80. doi: 10.3758/bf03195266.
5
Learning the experimenter's design: tacit sensitivity to the structure of memory lists.了解实验者的设计:对记忆列表结构的隐性敏感性。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1997 Feb;50(1):199-215. doi: 10.1080/027249897392297.
6
Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy.记忆准确性战略调控中的监测与控制过程。
Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):490-517. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.3.490.
7
Remembering and knowing: two means of access to the personal past.记忆与知晓:通向个人过往的两种途径。
Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):89-102. doi: 10.3758/bf03211168.
8
Identifying exceptions in a database of recognition failure studies from 1973 to 1992.
Mem Cognit. 1993 May;21(3):397-410. doi: 10.3758/bf03208273.
9
Semantic specificity in cued recall.线索回忆中的语义特异性
Mem Cognit. 1980 Jan;8(1):65-74. doi: 10.3758/bf03197553.