• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科新手是虚拟现实训练实验室的目标群体。

Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.

作者信息

Hassan Iyad, Maschuw Katja, Rothmund Matthias, Koller Michael, Gerdes Berthold

机构信息

Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Eur Surg Res. 2006;38(2):109-13. doi: 10.1159/000093282. Epub 2006 May 11.

DOI:10.1159/000093282
PMID:16699284
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study aims to establish which physicians represent the suitable target group of a virtual training laboratory.

METHODS

Novices (48 physicians with fewer than 10 laparoscopic operations) and intermediate trainees (19 physicians who performed 30-50 laparoscopic operations) participated in this study. Each participant performed the basic module 'clip application' at the beginning and after a 1-hour short training course on the LapSim. The course consisted of the tasks coordination, lift and grasp, clip application, cutting with diathermy and fine dissection at increasing difficulty levels. The time taken to complete the tasks, number of errors, and economy of motion parameters (path length and angular path) were analyzed.

RESULTS

Following training with the simulator, novices completed the task significantly faster (p = 0.001), demonstrated a greater economy of motion [path length (p = 0.04) and angular path (p = 0.01)]. In contrast, the intermediate trainees showed a reduction of their errors, but without reaching statistical significance. They showed no improvement in economy of motion and completed the task significantly slower (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Novices, in comparison to intermediate trainees, tend to benefit most during their first exposure to a laparoscopy simulator.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定哪些医生是虚拟训练实验室的合适目标群体。

方法

新手(48名腹腔镜手术经验少于10次的医生)和中级受训者(19名进行了30 - 50次腹腔镜手术的医生)参与了本研究。每位参与者在开始时以及在LapSim上进行1小时的短期培训课程后,执行基本模块“夹子应用”。该课程包括任务协调、提起和抓握、夹子应用、电刀切割以及难度逐渐增加的精细解剖。分析完成任务所需的时间、错误数量和动作经济性参数(路径长度和角路径)。

结果

在使用模拟器训练后,新手完成任务的速度明显更快(p = 0.001),动作经济性更高[路径长度(p = 0.04)和角路径(p = 0.01)]。相比之下,中级受训者的错误有所减少,但未达到统计学意义。他们在动作经济性方面没有改善,完成任务的速度明显更慢(p = 0.03)。

结论

与中级受训者相比,新手在首次接触腹腔镜模拟器时往往受益最大。

相似文献

1
Novices in surgery are the target group of a virtual reality training laboratory.外科新手是虚拟现实训练实验室的目标群体。
Eur Surg Res. 2006;38(2):109-13. doi: 10.1159/000093282. Epub 2006 May 11.
2
Documenting a learning curve and test-retest reliability of two tasks on a virtual reality training simulator in laparoscopic surgery.记录腹腔镜手术虚拟现实训练模拟器上两项任务的学习曲线和重测信度。
J Surg Educ. 2007 Nov-Dec;64(6):424-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2007.08.007.
3
Comparison of minimally invasive surgical skills of neurosurgeons versus general surgeons: is there a difference in the first exposure to a virtual reality simulator?神经外科医生与普通外科医生微创手术技能的比较:在首次接触虚拟现实模拟器方面是否存在差异?
Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2007 Apr;50(2):111-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-954827.
4
The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.触觉反馈在腹腔镜模拟训练中的作用。
J Surg Res. 2009 Oct;156(2):312-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2009.04.018. Epub 2009 May 14.
5
Clinical background is required for optimum performance with a VR laparoscopy simulator.使用VR腹腔镜模拟器实现最佳性能需要临床背景知识。
Comput Aided Surg. 2006 Mar;11(2):103-6. doi: 10.3109/10929080600629082.
6
The LapSim: a learning environment for both experts and novices.LapSim:一个面向专家和新手的学习环境。
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2005;111:414-7.
7
A computer-based laparoscopic skills assessment device differentiates experienced from novice laparoscopic surgeons.一种基于计算机的腹腔镜技能评估设备能够区分经验丰富的腹腔镜外科医生和新手。
Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1085-9. doi: 10.1007/s004640080022.
8
Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.增强现实与虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟:有何区别?ProMIS增强现实腹腔镜模拟器与LapSim虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器的比较。
World J Surg. 2007 Apr;31(4):764-72. doi: 10.1007/s00268-006-0724-y.
9
[Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].[外科教育中的模拟训练——虚拟现实腹腔镜模拟器在外科技能课程中的应用]
Zentralbl Chir. 2012 Apr;137(2):130-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1283984. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
10
Objective evaluation of minimally invasive surgical skills for transplantation. Surgeons using a virtual reality simulator.移植微创手术技能的客观评估。使用虚拟现实模拟器的外科医生。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2009 Mar-Apr;104(2):181-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Research trends in virtual reality surgical simulation for education: a systematic review.虚拟现实手术模拟用于教育的研究趋势:一项系统综述
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Jun 15;28(2):51-61. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.51.
2
Coffee break has no impact on laparoscopic skills: a randomized double-blinded placebo-controlled parallel-group trial.咖啡休息对腹腔镜技能没有影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3533-3541. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08675-9. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
3
Initial validation of a virtual-reality robotic simulator.
虚拟现实机器人模拟器的初步验证。
J Robot Surg. 2008 Sep;2(3):145-9. doi: 10.1007/s11701-008-0099-1. Epub 2008 Jul 25.
4
Perceiving haptic feedback in virtual reality simulators.在虚拟现实模拟器中感知触觉反馈。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Jul;27(7):2391-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2745-y. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
5
Limitations of haptic feedback devices on construct validity of the LapSim® virtual reality simulator.触觉反馈设备对 LapSim®虚拟现实模拟器结构有效性的局限性。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1386-96. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2621-9. Epub 2012 Dec 12.
6
Suitability of a virtual reality simulator for laparoscopic skills assessment in a surgical training course.虚拟现实模拟器在手术培训课程中进行腹腔镜技能评估的适宜性。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Apr;28(4):563-71. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1589-1. Epub 2012 Sep 30.
7
Effect of haptic feedback in laparoscopic surgery skill acquisition.触觉反馈对腹腔镜手术技能习得的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1128-34. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2011-8. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
8
Prospective randomized controlled trial of simulator-based versus traditional in-surgery laparoscopic camera navigation training.基于模拟器的与传统手术中腹腔镜摄像导航训练的前瞻性随机对照试验。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jan;26(1):235-41. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1860-5. Epub 2011 Aug 19.
9
Do soft skills predict surgical performance?: a single-center randomized controlled trial evaluating predictors of skill acquisition in virtual reality laparoscopy.软技能能否预测手术表现?:一项评估虚拟现实腹腔镜技能获得预测因素的单中心随机对照试验。
World J Surg. 2011 Mar;35(3):480-6. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0933-2.
10
The LapSim virtual reality simulator: promising but not yet proven.拉普模拟虚拟现实模拟器:有前景但尚未得到证实。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):343-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1181-0. Epub 2010 Jul 8.