Suppr超能文献

骨替代物的评估:显微放射照相与组织学评估的比较

Evaluation of substitutes for bone: comparison of microradiographic and histological assessments.

作者信息

Thorwarth M, Wehrhan F, Srour S, Schultze-Mosgau S, Felszeghy E, Bader R D, Schlegel K A

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Plastic Surgery, University of Jena, Erlanger Allee 101, D-07747 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):41-7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2006.03.013. Epub 2006 May 19.

Abstract

We created defects of standard size in the frontal bones of adult pigs and filled them with four different materials. On six occasions (at 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, and 26 weeks), samples were harvested, and evaluated by computing microradiographic images. We examined the specimens histologically as controls. After insertion of anorganic materials, microradiographic evaluation was easy and precise, and there were no significant differences between them and the histological controls (p=0.2). A quantitative evaluation of chemically sterilised bone by computer was not possible for more than 4 weeks.

摘要

我们在成年猪的额骨上制造了标准尺寸的缺损,并使用四种不同材料对其进行填充。在六个时间点(第1、2、4、8、12和26周)采集样本,并通过计算微放射图像进行评估。我们对标本进行组织学检查作为对照。植入无机材料后,微放射学评估简便且精确,且与组织学对照之间无显著差异(p = 0.2)。超过4周后无法通过计算机对化学消毒骨进行定量评估。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验