Johnsson Jörgen I, Bohlin Torgny
Department of Zoology, Animal Ecology, Göteborg University, Box 463, SE 405-30 Göteborg, Sweden.
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1281-6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2005.3437.
Although laboratory and observational studies suggest that many animals are capable of compensatory growth after periods of food shortage, few field experiments have demonstrated structural growth compensation in the wild. Here, we addressed the hypotheses that (i) food restriction can induce structural compensatory growth in free-living animals, (ii) that compensation is proportional to the level of body size retardation and (iii) that compensation induces mortality costs. To test these, wild brown trout (Salmo trutta) yearlings were brought to the lab, tagged individually, subjected to four levels of food deprivation (including a control), released back into the native stream and recaptured after one, five and ten months. Brown trout fully restored condition and partially restored mass within a month, whereas compensation in structure (i.e. body length) was not evident until after five months, supporting hypothesis 1. As the level of growth compensation was similar among the three deprived groups, hypothesis 2 was not supported. A final recapture after winter revealed delayed mortality, apparently induced by the compensatory response in the deprived groups, which is consistent with hypothesis 3. To our knowledge, this is the first field experiment demonstrating structural compensatory growth and associated costs in a wild animal population.
尽管实验室研究和观察性研究表明,许多动物在经历食物短缺期后能够进行补偿性生长,但很少有野外实验证明野生动物存在结构生长补偿现象。在此,我们探讨了以下假设:(i)食物限制会促使自由生活的动物出现结构补偿性生长;(ii)补偿与体型发育迟缓程度成正比;(iii)补偿会引发死亡代价。为了验证这些假设,我们将野生一岁褐鳟(Salmo trutta)带到实验室,单独标记,使其经历四种食物剥夺水平(包括一个对照组),然后放回原生溪流,并在1个月、5个月和10个月后重新捕获。褐鳟在1个月内完全恢复了身体状况,部分恢复了体重,而结构补偿(即体长)直到5个月后才明显,这支持了假设1。由于三个剥夺组的生长补偿水平相似,假设2未得到支持。冬季后的最后一次重新捕获显示,被剥夺组的补偿反应明显导致了延迟死亡,这与假设3一致。据我们所知,这是首个证明野生动物种群存在结构补偿性生长及相关代价的野外实验。