McElree Brian, Pylkkänen Liina, Pickering Martin J, Traxler Matthew J
Department of Psychology, New York University, 6 Washington Place, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Feb;13(1):53-9. doi: 10.3758/bf03193812.
Linguistic analyses suggest that common and seemingly simple expressions, such as began the book, cannot be interpreted with simple compositional processes; rather, they require enriched composition to provide an interpretation, such as began reading the book (Jackendoff, 1997; Pustejovsky, 1995). Recent reading time studies have supported these accounts by providing evidence that these expressions are more costly to process than are minimally contrasting controls (e.g., McElree, Traxler, Pickering, Seely, and Jackendoff, 2001). We report a response signal speed-accuracy trade-off (SAT) study in which two types of expressions that are thought to require enriched composition were examined. Analyses of the full time course SAT data indicate that these expressions were interpreted less accurately and, most importantly, more slowly than control sentences. The latter finding suggests that enriched composition requires the online deployment of complex compositional operations.
语言分析表明,一些常见且看似简单的表达,比如began the book,无法通过简单的组合过程来进行解读;相反,它们需要丰富组合才能给出解释,比如began reading the book(杰肯道夫,1997;普斯特乔夫斯基,1995)。近期的阅读时间研究为这些观点提供了支持,证据表明,相较于最低限度对比的控制组表达(例如,麦克尔里、特拉克斯勒、皮克林、西利和杰肯道夫,2001),这些表达在处理上的成本更高。我们报告了一项反应信号速度-准确性权衡(SAT)研究,其中考察了两类被认为需要丰富组合的表达。对完整时间进程的SAT数据进行分析后发现,与控制句相比,这些表达的解读准确性更低,而且,最重要的是,解读速度更慢。后一个发现表明,丰富组合需要在线进行复杂的组合操作。