Suppr超能文献

阅读时间证明成分丰富。

Reading time evidence for enriched composition.

作者信息

McElree B, Traxler M J, Pickering M J, Seely R E, Jackendoff R

机构信息

Psychology Department, New York University, 8th Floor, 6 Washington Place, NY 10003-6634, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 2001 Jan;78(1):B17-25. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(00)00113-x.

Abstract

Verbs like 'begin' and 'enjoy' appear to semantically select a complement that expresses an activity or an event (Jackendoff, R. (1997). The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; Pustejovsky, J. Cognition 41 (1991) 47; Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press). When these verbs occur with a complement that does not directly denote either an activity or an event (e.g. '... began the book' or '... enjoyed the book'), the complement must be type-shifted from an object to an activity to conform to the verb's semantic restrictions. We report an experiment in which self-paced reading times were found to be longer for complements that required type-shifting than for complements that directly matched the semantic restrictions of the matrix verb. This finding is argued to provide on-line evidence for a type of enriched lexical processing posited in recent lexical semantic research.

摘要

像“begin”和“enjoy”这样的动词在语义上似乎选择一个表达活动或事件的补足语(杰肯多夫,R.(1997年)。语言官能的结构。马萨诸塞州剑桥:麻省理工学院出版社;普斯泰乔夫斯基,J.《认知》41(1991年)47;普斯泰乔夫斯基,J.(1995年)。生成词库。马萨诸塞州剑桥:麻省理工学院出版社)。当这些动词与一个不直接表示活动或事件的补足语一起出现时(例如“……开始读这本书”或“……喜欢这本书”),补足语必须从宾语类型转换为活动类型,以符合动词的语义限制。我们报告了一项实验,其中发现需要类型转换的补足语的自定步速阅读时间比直接符合主句动词语义限制的补足语更长。这一发现被认为为近期词汇语义研究中提出的一种丰富的词汇加工类型提供了在线证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验