Suppr超能文献

一种评估患者对医学研究人员信任度的测量方法的开发。

Development of a measure to assess patient trust in medical researchers.

作者信息

Mainous Arch G, Smith Daniel W, Geesey Mark E, Tilley Barbara C

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):247-52. doi: 10.1370/afm.541.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Many researchers find it difficult to recruit individuals, particularly minorities, for participation in studies. Mistrust of research and researchers may act as a barrier to participation. The purpose of this study was to develop a scale for assessing trust in medical researchers.

METHODS

We developed a multi-item scale by means of multiple cognitive pretests with 25 African American adults and a random-digit-dialing telephone survey of 512 adults in South Carolina. Psychometric characteristics of the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale was assessed by factor analysis using both orthogonal and oblique rotations and Cronbach's alpha. We assessed construct validity as well as a behavioral intention for future participation in a medical research project.

RESULTS

The results of the orthogonal and oblique rotations in the exploratory factor analysis were similar and suggested 2 distinct factors in the final 12 items included in the scale. Cronbach's alpha for the entire scale was 0.84, whereas it was 0.78 for the first factor of Participant Deception and 0.75 for the second factor of Researcher Honesty. White respondents (28.7 +/- 5.6) had greater trust than African American respondents (24.1 +/- 6.9) (P <.001). Individuals with high trust in medical researchers were more likely to express interest in future participation in medical research.

CONCLUSIONS

The Trust in Medical Researchers Scale has good psychometric qualities and differentiates African American from white respondents, as well as individuals who indicate that they are likely to participate in medical research from those who are not. More focused investigations in hard-to-recruit populations will help to establish the utility of the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale.

摘要

目的

许多研究人员发现招募个体,尤其是少数族裔参与研究很困难。对研究及研究人员的不信任可能成为参与研究的障碍。本研究的目的是开发一种用于评估对医学研究人员信任度的量表。

方法

我们通过对25名非裔美国成年人进行多次认知预测试,并对南卡罗来纳州的512名成年人进行随机数字拨号电话调查,开发了一个多项目量表。使用正交和斜交旋转以及克朗巴赫α系数通过因子分析评估医学研究人员信任度量表的心理测量特征。我们评估了结构效度以及未来参与医学研究项目的行为意向。

结果

探索性因子分析中正交和斜交旋转的结果相似,表明该量表最终包含的12个项目中有2个不同的因子。整个量表的克朗巴赫α系数为0.84,而参与者欺骗第一个因子的系数为0.78,研究人员诚实第二个因子的系数为0.75。白人受访者(28.7±5.6)比非裔美国受访者(24.1±6.9)具有更高的信任度(P<.001)。对医学研究人员信任度高的个体更有可能表示有兴趣未来参与医学研究。

结论

医学研究人员信任度量表具有良好的心理测量质量,能够区分非裔美国人和白人受访者,以及表明可能参与医学研究的个体和不参与的个体。对难以招募的人群进行更有针对性的调查将有助于确定医学研究人员信任度量表的效用。

相似文献

4
Measuring trust in medical researchers.衡量对医学研究人员的信任度。
Med Care. 2006 Nov;44(11):1048-53. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000228023.37087.cb.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Measuring patients' trust in their primary care providers.衡量患者对其初级保健提供者的信任度。
Med Care Res Rev. 2002 Sep;59(3):293-318. doi: 10.1177/1077558702059003004.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验