• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南卡罗来纳州社区对参与癌症研究的信任、态度和偏好。

Community Trust, Attitudes and Preferences Related to Participation in Cancer Research in South Carolina.

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Clemson University, 513 Edwards Hall, Clemson, SC, 29634, U.S.A.

Department of Biobehavioral Health and Nursing Science, College of Nursing, University of South Carolina, 1601 Greene St, Columbia, SC, 29208, U.S.A.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):100-107. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01251-3. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-023-01251-3
PMID:37531048
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11235381/
Abstract

African American adults have the highest mortality rate for most cancers in the United States, and meaningful, community-driven research is needed to inform optimal strategies for addressing these disparities. Unfortunately, research mistrust, often driven by historical inequities, is well-documented among African Americans.This study explored trust, attitudes, and preferences regarding participation in cancer research activities among primarily African American and other medically underserved communities in South Carolina from August 2020 to December 2021. Trust was measured using the Trust in Medical Researchers Scale (TMRS).The mean TMRS score for all study participants (N = 179) was 26.54 (SD 7.57) out of 48 (maximum possible score). Significant differences in mean values of the TMRS scores were only observed for gender (p = 0.0056) and race (p < 0.0001), with White participants and males reporting higher levels of trust in medical researchers. Overall, 52.5% of participants were somewhat likely or likely to volunteer to participate in a cancer research opportunity, with White participants (73.81%) being more likely to participate in cancer research compared to African American participants (45.74%) (p = 0.0054). Furthermore, participants were most willing to provide saliva (80.85%) and urine samples (80.85%), new blood samples (60.64%), stool samples (54.26%), medical records or laboratory results (52.13%) and least willing to allow left-over blood, tissue, or other fluids from medical procedures to be used for research (50%).These results provide evidence of the need for concerted programmatic efforts to build trust in cancer researchers, particularly among females and African American adults.

摘要

美国的非裔成年人在大多数癌症中的死亡率最高,需要进行有意义的、以社区为导向的研究,为解决这些差异提供最佳策略。不幸的是,非裔美国人中存在着严重的研究不信任现象,这主要是由于历史上的不平等造成的。本研究于 2020 年 8 月至 2021 年 12 月在南卡罗来纳州的非裔和其他医疗服务不足的社区中,探索了对参与癌症研究活动的信任、态度和偏好。使用医疗研究人员信任量表(TMRS)来衡量信任。所有研究参与者(N=179)的 TMRS 平均得分为 26.54(SD=7.57),满分 48 分。TMRS 评分的平均值仅在性别(p=0.0056)和种族(p<0.0001)上存在显著差异,白人参与者和男性报告对医疗研究人员的信任度更高。总体而言,52.5%的参与者表示有些可能或可能会自愿参加癌症研究机会,与非裔参与者(45.74%)相比,白人参与者(73.81%)更有可能参加癌症研究(p=0.0054)。此外,参与者最愿意提供唾液(80.85%)和尿液样本(80.85%)、新的血液样本(60.64%)、粪便样本(54.26%)、医疗记录或实验室结果(52.13%),而最不愿意允许从医疗程序中剩余的血液、组织或其他液体用于研究(50%)。这些结果表明,需要有协调一致的方案努力来建立对癌症研究人员的信任,尤其是在女性和非裔成年人中。

相似文献

1
Community Trust, Attitudes and Preferences Related to Participation in Cancer Research in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州社区对参与癌症研究的信任、态度和偏好。
J Community Health. 2024 Feb;49(1):100-107. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01251-3. Epub 2023 Aug 2.
2
Recruiting intergenerational African American males for biomedical research Studies: a major research challenge.招募非裔美国男性跨代参与生物医学研究:一项重大研究挑战。
J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Jun;103(6):480-7. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30361-8.
3
Racial/ethnic differences in trust in health care: HIV conspiracy beliefs and vaccine research participation.医疗保健信任方面的种族/族裔差异:艾滋病病毒阴谋论信念与疫苗研究参与情况
J Gen Intern Med. 2014 Jan;29(1):140-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-013-2554-6.
4
African American participation in health-related research studies: indicators for effective recruitment.非裔美国人参与健康相关研究的情况:有效招募的指标。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):110-8. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e31825717ef.
5
Development of a measure to assess patient trust in medical researchers.一种评估患者对医学研究人员信任度的测量方法的开发。
Ann Fam Med. 2006 May-Jun;4(3):247-52. doi: 10.1370/afm.541.
6
Prostate cancer disparities in South Carolina: early detection, special programs, and descriptive epidemiology.南卡罗来纳州的前列腺癌差异:早期检测、特殊项目及描述性流行病学
J S C Med Assoc. 2006 Aug;102(7):241-9.
7
Factors affecting research participation in African American college students.影响非裔美国大学生参与研究的因素。
Fam Med. 2008 Jan;40(1):46-51.
8
Factors Associated With Racial/Ethnic Group-Based Medical Mistrust and Perspectives on COVID-19 Vaccine Trial Participation and Vaccine Uptake in the US.与基于种族/民族的医疗不信任相关的因素,以及美国民众对 COVID-19 疫苗试验参与和疫苗接种的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2111629. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11629.
9
Unexpected findings in the exploration of African American underrepresentation in biospecimen collection and biobanks.在探索非裔美国人在生物样本采集和生物样本库中代表性不足问题时的意外发现。
J Cancer Educ. 2014 Sep;29(3):580-7. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0586-6.
10
Race, medical researcher distrust, perceived harm, and willingness to participate in cardiovascular prevention trials.种族、对医学研究人员的不信任、感知到的危害以及参与心血管预防试验的意愿。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2008 Jan;87(1):1-9. doi: 10.1097/MD.0b013e3181625d78.

引用本文的文献

1
Selection biases in the systematic collection of breast biobank specimens.乳腺生物样本库标本系统收集过程中的选择偏倚。
NPJ Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug 1;11(1):83. doi: 10.1038/s41523-025-00798-9.
2
A Digital Asthma Self-Management Program for Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.一项针对成年人的数字哮喘自我管理项目:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jul 1;8(7):e2521438. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.21438.
3
Ranking of Health Problems and Prioritization of Cancer Education Topics by African American Communities in South Carolina.南卡罗来纳州非裔美国人社区的健康问题排名及癌症教育主题的优先排序
J Cancer Educ. 2025 Aug;40(4):559-566. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02543-5. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
4
Access to and interest in human milk research opportunities among Black pregnant and postpartum people.黑人孕妇和产后女性获得母乳研究机会的情况及对此的兴趣。
Front Nutr. 2024 Apr 12;11:1274833. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1274833. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and Validation of the Perceptions of Research Trustworthiness Scale to Measure Trust Among Minoritized Racial and Ethnic Groups in Biomedical Research in the US.美国生物医学研究中少数族裔群体对研究可信度感知量表的编制与验证:旨在测量信任度。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Dec 1;5(12):e2248812. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.48812.
2
NACP: Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention.美洲原住民癌症预防伙伴关系(NACP)
Cancer Health Disparities. 2021;5. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
3
Engaging Faith-Based Organizations to Promote Health Through Health Ministries in Washington, DC.与信仰组织合作,通过华盛顿特区的健康事工促进健康。
J Relig Health. 2024 Jun;63(3):2011-2030. doi: 10.1007/s10943-022-01651-0. Epub 2022 Sep 10.
4
Race/ethnicity reporting and representation in US clinical trials: a cohort study.美国临床试验中的种族/族裔报告与代表性:一项队列研究。
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Jul;11. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100252. Epub 2022 Apr 10.
5
Sex Inequalities in Medical Research: A Systematic Scoping Review of the Literature.医学研究中的性别不平等:文献的系统综述
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 Jan 31;3(1):49-59. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0083. eCollection 2022.
6
Comparison of factors influencing the willingness to donate biospecimens among guardians of children with cancer and adult cancer patients.比较影响癌症患儿监护人和成年癌症患者捐赠生物样本意愿的因素。
Cancer Med. 2022 Mar;11(6):1524-1534. doi: 10.1002/cam4.4544. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
7
Cancer statistics, 2022.癌症统计数据,2022 年。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2022 Jan;72(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21708. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
8
Interventions to Mitigate COVID-19 Misinformation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.缓解 COVID-19 错误信息的干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Health Commun. 2021 Dec 2;26(12):846-857. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2021.2021460. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
9
Participation of Black Americans in Cancer Clinical Trials: Current Challenges and Proposed Solutions.美国黑人参与癌症临床试验:当前的挑战与解决方案建议。
JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 May;17(5):265-271. doi: 10.1200/OP.21.00001.
10
Addressing racial/ethnic disparities in cancer clinical trials: Everyone has a role to play.解决癌症临床试验中的种族/民族差异:每个人都可以发挥作用。
Cancer. 2021 Sep 15;127(18):3282-3289. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33600. Epub 2021 Apr 27.