• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日本的礼貌与实施无烟政策面临的挑战。

Courtesy and the challenges of implementing smoke-free policies in Japan.

作者信息

Bialous Stella Aguinaga, Mochizuki-Kobayashi Yumiko, Stillman Frances

机构信息

Tobacco Policy International, San Francisco, CA, USA.

出版信息

Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Apr;8(2):203-16. doi: 10.1080/14622200600576297.

DOI:10.1080/14622200600576297
PMID:16766413
Abstract

For decades, the tobacco companies have developed a worldwide campaign to oppose the creation of smoke-free environments. Public health efforts to promote clean indoor air have been uneven throughout the world, and in few places have such efforts faced as many challenges as in Japan. The Japanese market is dominated by Japan Tobacco, which is partly owned by the government, and Philip Morris International is also present in Japan. Japan Tobacco and Philip Morris International have developed campaigns promoting courtesy and tolerance that, until recently, seem to have resonated well with the public. The companies also have supported research promoting ventilation and have funded consultants to act as experts in the area of second-hand smoke exposure. Japan is a critical country to study, partly because of the strength of Japan Tobacco in the country and the growth of Japan Tobacco International in Southeast Asia and the rest of the world, and partly because of Japan's ratification of the World Health Organization Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. This paper uses tobacco industry documents to provide an overview of the tobacco industry's scientific and political efforts to stifle the development of clean indoor measures in Japan. Learning past industry strategies may assist policymakers and advocates in the development of future public health activities.

摘要

几十年来,烟草公司开展了一场全球运动来反对创建无烟环境。在全球范围内,促进室内空气清洁的公共卫生努力并不均衡,很少有地方像日本这样面临如此多的挑战。日本市场由部分归政府所有的日本烟草公司主导,菲利普·莫里斯国际公司也在日本开展业务。日本烟草公司和菲利普·莫里斯国际公司开展了倡导礼貌和宽容的活动,直到最近,这些活动似乎在公众中引起了很好的反响。这些公司还支持有关促进通风的研究,并资助顾问充当二手烟暴露领域的专家。日本是一个关键的研究对象国,部分原因是日本烟草公司在该国的实力以及日本烟草国际公司在东南亚和世界其他地区的发展,部分原因是日本批准了世界卫生组织《烟草控制框架公约》。本文利用烟草行业文件概述了烟草行业在日本阻碍清洁室内措施发展的科学和政治努力。了解过去的行业策略可能有助于政策制定者和倡导者开展未来的公共卫生活动。

相似文献

1
Courtesy and the challenges of implementing smoke-free policies in Japan.日本的礼貌与实施无烟政策面临的挑战。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Apr;8(2):203-16. doi: 10.1080/14622200600576297.
2
Legislating tolerance: Spain's national public smoking law.立法容忍:西班牙的国家公共场所禁烟法。
Tob Control. 2010 Feb;19(1):24-30. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031831. Epub 2009 Oct 21.
3
The tobacco industry's worldwide ETS consultants project: European and Asian components.烟草行业的全球环境烟草烟雾顾问项目:欧洲和亚洲部分
Eur J Public Health. 2006 Feb;16(1):69-77. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/cki044. Epub 2005 Aug 2.
4
"Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America.“变通性”无烟政策:烟草行业在拉丁美洲的“选择礼遇”计划
Tob Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):e6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018275.
5
After the smoke has cleared: evaluation of the impact of a new national smoke-free law in New Zealand.尘埃落定之后:新西兰一项新的全国无烟法律的影响评估
Tob Control. 2008 Feb;17(1):e2. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020347.
6
Turning free speech into corporate speech: Philip Morris' efforts to influence U.S. and European journalists regarding the U.S. EPA report on secondhand smoke.将言论自由转变为企业言论:菲利普·莫里斯公司就美国环境保护局关于二手烟的报告对美国和欧洲记者施加影响的种种努力。
Prev Med. 2004 Sep;39(3):568-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.02.014.
7
Changing conclusions on secondhand smoke in a sudden infant death syndrome review funded by the tobacco industry.在一项由烟草行业资助的婴儿猝死综合征评估中,关于二手烟的结论突然改变。
Pediatrics. 2005 Mar;115(3):e356-66. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1922.
8
The tobacco industry and secondhand smoke: lessons from Central and South America.烟草行业与二手烟:来自中美洲和南美洲的教训
Ethn Dis. 2003 Summer;13(2 Suppl 2):S88-90.
9
The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) and the adoption of domestic tobacco control policies: the Ecuadorian experience.《烟草控制框架公约》与国内烟草控制政策的采用:厄瓜多尔的经验
Tob Control. 2009 Feb;18(1):18-21. doi: 10.1136/tc.2008.026385. Epub 2008 Oct 20.
10
Smoke-free air policies: past, present and future.无烟空气政策:过去、现在和未来。
Tob Control. 2012 Mar;21(2):154-61. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050389.

引用本文的文献

1
Survey Methods of the 2018 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Japan Survey.2018 年国际烟草控制(ITC)日本调查的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Apr 10;17(7):2598. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072598.
2
It's Just Steam: a qualitative analysis of New Zealand ENDS users' perceptions of secondhand aerosol.只是蒸汽:新西兰 ENDS 用户对二手气溶胶看法的定性分析。
Tob Control. 2021 Jan;30(1):30-35. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055368. Epub 2020 Feb 11.
3
Secondhand Smoke Exposure in Public Places and Support for Smoke-Free Laws in Japan: Findings from the 2018 ITC Japan Survey.
公共场所二手烟暴露与日本支持无烟立法:来自 2018 年 ITC 日本调查的发现。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 4;17(3):979. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030979.
4
'The industry must be inconspicuous': Japan Tobacco's corruption of science and health policy via the Smoking Research Foundation.“该行业必须不引人注目”:日本烟草公司通过吸烟研究基金会对科学和健康政策的腐蚀。
Tob Control. 2018 Feb 4;27(e1):e3-e11. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-053971.
5
Conveying misinformation: Top-ranked Japanese books on tobacco.传播错误信息:日本排名靠前的烟草相关书籍。
Tob Induc Dis. 2011 Jan 24;9(1):3. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-9-3.
6
Civil society and the negotiation of the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.民间社会与《烟草控制框架公约》的谈判
Glob Public Health. 2009;4(2):150-68. doi: 10.1080/17441690802095355.
7
Too many Japanese university students are still smoking tobacco.仍有太多日本大学生在吸烟。
Tob Induc Dis. 2008 Nov 18;4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-4-10.
8
"Accommodating" smoke-free policies: tobacco industry's Courtesy of Choice programme in Latin America.“变通性”无烟政策:烟草行业在拉丁美洲的“选择礼遇”计划
Tob Control. 2007 Oct;16(5):e6. doi: 10.1136/tc.2006.018275.