Suppr超能文献

[重症患者的护理工作量。NEMS与NAS的比较研究]

[Care work load in critical patients. Comparative study NEMS versus NAS].

作者信息

Bernat Adell Amparo, Abizanda Campos Ricardo, Yvars Bou María, Quintana Bellmunt Javier, Gascó García Consuelo, Soriano Canuto Montserrat, Reig Valero Roberto, Vidal Tegedor Bárbara

机构信息

Diplomados en Enfermería, Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital Universitario Asociado General de Castellón, Castellón, Spain.

出版信息

Enferm Intensiva. 2006 Apr-Jun;17(2):67-77. doi: 10.1016/s1130-2399(06)73918-9.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The systems of calculating care load have not yet reached the levels of generalized use which the systems of prognostic estimation of survival have. The reason for this is their potential defects of design (medical and not nursing conceptualization) and the sometimes confusing completion (TISS 76). The simplest ("nine equivalents of nurse manpower use score" [NEMS], care levels) add the difficulty of not being useful for the calculation of staff, because the design is not oriented towards nursing. The development of NAS (nursing activity score) by FRICE tries to solve all these problems. Our objective has been to verify to what degree the NEMS and NAS are correlated as systems of expression and calculation of care load.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

During the last quarter of 2004, NEMS and NAS have been used simultaneously by the nursing staff. During this period, 150 pairs of daily calculation values of NEMS-NAS and 150 pairs of calculation values by shift of NEMS-NAS have been collected. Comparison of means and linear correlation of values obtained and the analysis of the histograms of values of each series, their value ranges and analysis of their bias coefficients have been done. The analysis was done with the SPSS/PC 11.

RESULTS

During the period indicated, it has been verified that NEMS has a much narrower value range than NAS, both in regards to daily values (18-45 versus 29.70-84.50) and in regards to values by shift (18-45 versus 22.40-84.50). The bias analysis shows a deviation to the left of both series of values. Linear correlation between NEMS-NAS by shift shows a R2 of 0.1634 and becomes even poorer in the NEMS-NAS correlation per day with R2 of 0.2012. It should also be stressed that NEMS expresses its results in points while NAS does so in percentage of time occupied in the attention and care of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

In this preliminary study, the better adaptation of NAS versus NEMS to real work loads of patients hospitalized in the ICU and the non-possible correlation between the values of both systems is affirmed.

摘要

引言

护理负荷计算系统尚未达到生存预后评估系统那样的广泛应用程度。原因在于其潜在的设计缺陷(医学而非护理概念化)以及有时令人困惑的填写方式(TISS 76)。最简单的方法(“护士人力使用评分的九个等效值”[NEMS],护理级别)增加了对人员计算无用的难度,因为其设计并非以护理为导向。弗里茨开发的NAS(护理活动评分)试图解决所有这些问题。我们的目标是验证NEMS和NAS作为护理负荷表达和计算系统的相关程度。

患者与方法

在2004年最后一个季度,护理人员同时使用了NEMS和NAS。在此期间,收集了150对NEMS - NAS的每日计算值以及150对NEMS - NAS的班次计算值。对所获值进行了均值比较、线性相关分析以及每个系列值的直方图分析、其值域分析和偏差系数分析。分析使用SPSS/PC 11进行。

结果

在所示期间,已验证无论是每日值(18 - 45对29.70 - 84.50)还是班次值(18 - 45对22.40 - 84.50),NEMS的值域都比NAS窄得多。偏差分析显示两个值系列均向左偏移。班次的NEMS - NAS之间的线性相关显示R²为0.1634,每日的NEMS - NAS相关性更差,R²为0.2012。还应强调的是,NEMS以点数表示结果,而NAS以用于患者护理和关注的时间百分比表示结果。

结论

在这项初步研究中,肯定了NAS比NEMS更能适应ICU住院患者的实际工作负荷,且两个系统的值之间不存在相关性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验