Suppr超能文献

时间限制与儿童偏差行为的抑制。

Timeout duration and the suppression of deviant behavior in children.

机构信息

Oregon Research Institute.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Summer;5(2):111-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-111.

Abstract

The effects of three different timeout durations were investigated in a group of 20 retarded, institutionalized subjects. Each subject received 1, 15, and 30 min of timeout in a design that was counterbalanced in terms of the order in which timeout durations were presented. Displays of deviant behavior-such as aggression, tantrums, and self-destruction-were followed by periods of isolation in a timeout room. A reversal design was employed such that return-to-baseline periods were instituted after each timeout period. The overall effect of timeout was to reduce significantly the rate of deviant behavior. On the average, 15 and 30 min produced a 35% decrease in deviant behavior with little difference between the effectiveness of 15 and 30 min. The range of effects in all timeout conditions varied widely. The sequence in which the 1-min duration was presented effected the direction of its effect. When it preceded the use of longer durations, 1 min was most effective. As it came later in the sequence, its suppressive characteristics became less reliable.

摘要

在一个由 20 名智障、机构化的被试组成的小组中,研究了三种不同的超时持续时间的效果。在一种平衡了超时持续时间呈现顺序的设计中,每个被试接受了 1 分钟、15 分钟和 30 分钟的超时。在超时室中,隔离会跟随偏差行为的展示,例如攻击、发脾气和自残。采用反转设计,在每个超时期间后都进行回归基线期。超时的总体效果是显著降低偏差行为的发生率。平均而言,15 分钟和 30 分钟使偏差行为减少了 35%,而 15 分钟和 30 分钟的效果之间几乎没有差异。所有超时条件的效果范围差异很大。1 分钟持续时间呈现的顺序影响了其效果的方向。当它先于较长时间的使用时,1 分钟最有效。随着它在序列中出现得越来越晚,其抑制特性变得不太可靠。

相似文献

1
Timeout duration and the suppression of deviant behavior in children.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Summer;5(2):111-20. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-111.
2
Some determinants of the reinforcing and punishing effects of timeout.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1977 Fall;10(3):415-24. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1977.10-415.
3
Effects of lick-contingent timeout on schedule-induced polydipsia.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1974 Jan;21(1):45-55. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1974.21-45.
4
Control of responding by stimulus duration.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):81-7. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-81.
5
An analysis of timeout and response cost in a programmed environment.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1972 Fall;5(3):271-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-271.
6
The timeout ribbon: a nonexclusionary timeout procedure.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1978 Spring;11(1):125-36. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1978.11-125.
7
Choice of timeout from fixed-time schedules: Comparison of two procedures.
Behav Processes. 1997 Jul;40(2):137-47. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(96)00770-x.
8
Response-dependent and response-independent timeout from an avoidance schedule.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1971 Jul;16(1):123-31. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1971.16-123.
9
Suppression of behavior by timeout punishment when suppression results in loss of positive reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1968 Sep;11(5):595-607. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1968.11-595.
10
Timeout postponement without increased reinforcement frequency.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2000 Sep;74(2):147-64. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-147.

引用本文的文献

1
Is It Time for "Time-In"?: A Pilot Test of the Child-Rearing Technique.
Pediatr Rep. 2022 May 23;14(2):244-253. doi: 10.3390/pediatric14020032.
2
Time-Out with Young Children: A Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) Practitioner Review.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Dec 23;19(1):145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19010145.
4
Behavioral coaching in the development of skills in football, gymnastics, and tennis.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1980 Summer;13(2):297-314. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1980.13-297.
5
On the status of knowledge for using punishment implications for treating behavior disorders.
J Appl Behav Anal. 2002 Winter;35(4):431-64. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2002.35-431.
6
The impact of functional analysis methodology on treatment choice for self-injurious and aggressive behavior.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Summer;32(2):185-95. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-185.
7
Decreasing self-stimulatory behavior with physical exercise in a group of autistic boys.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1980 Dec;10(4):379-87. doi: 10.1007/BF02414814.
8
Treatment of assaultive hair pulling in a multihandicapped youth.
J Autism Dev Disord. 1980 Sep;10(3):335-42. doi: 10.1007/BF02408292.
9
An analysis of maintenance following functional communication training.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Winter;25(4):777-94. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-777.
10
The effects of social punishment on noncompliance: a comparison with timeout and positive practice.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1976;9(4):471-82. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1976.9-471.

本文引用的文献

2
Control of tantrum behavior by operant techniques during experimental verbal training.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Fall;1(3):237-43. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-237.
3
The effects and side effects of punishing the autistic behaviors of a deviant child.
J Appl Behav Anal. 1968 Spring;1(1):21-34. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-21.
4
THE MODIFICATION OF DELIQUENT BEHAVIOR THROUGH OPERANT CONDITIONING.
Behav Res Ther. 1965 Apr;3:245-50. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(65)90033-1.
5
PUNISHMENT OF S-DELTA RESPONDING OF HUMANS IN CONDITIONAL MATCHING TO SAMPLE BY TIME-OUT.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Oct;6(4):589-97. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-589.
6
Intermittent punishment of Sdelta responding in matching to sample.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1963 Jul;6(3):349-56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1963.6-349.
7
The elimination of tantrum behavior by extinction procedures.
J Abnorm Soc Psychol. 1959 Sep;59:269. doi: 10.1037/h0046688.
8
Reinforcers and reinforcement: their relation to maze performance.
J Exp Psychol. 1960 Apr;59:226-32. doi: 10.1037/h0045962.
9
Punishment of S delta responding in matching to sample by time out from positive reinforcement.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jan;4(1):45-56. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1961.4-45.
10
Behavior therapy in the home: amelioration of problem parent-child relations with the parent in a therapeutic role.
J Exp Child Psychol. 1966 Sep;4(1):99-107. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(66)90054-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验