• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童的自我选择标准:学生自选和教师选的表现标准的相对有效性。

Self-selection of standards by children: The relative effectiveness of pupil-selected and teacher-selected standards of performance.

机构信息

Reed College.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):425-33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-425.

DOI:10.1901/jaba.1981.14-425
PMID:16795649
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1308231/
Abstract

This study examines the effects of contingent reinforcement under conditions of pupil-selected and teacher-selected performance standards upon pupils' academic response rates. The academic response rate was measured by the number of correct responses emitted per session. Thirty pupils (15 second-graders and 15 third-graders) were randomly assigned to one of three experimental groups, based on matched triplets. One group worked under pupil-selected standards; the second group worked under standards selected by the experimenter with each pupil yoked to a member of the pupil-selected standards groups. Both groups participated in the calculation of their daily earnings. The third group served as a no-contingency control group. Baseline academic response rates on writing and math tasks were determined. During the experimental sessions reinforcement was provided in the form of points which were later traded for tangible rewards. The pupil-selected standards group showed a significantly greater number of correct responses in the writing and math tasks than the externally selected standards group.

摘要

本研究考察了在学生选择和教师选择的绩效标准条件下,附带强化对学生学习反应率的影响。学习反应率通过每节课正确回答的数量来衡量。30 名学生(15 名二年级学生和 15 名三年级学生)根据匹配的三胞胎被随机分配到三个实验组之一。一组学生根据自己选择的标准工作;第二组学生根据实验者选择的标准工作,每个学生与选择学生标准的小组中的一名成员配对。两组学生都参与了每日收入的计算。第三组作为无强化对照组。确定了写作和数学任务的基线学习反应率。在实验期间,以积分的形式提供强化,之后可以用积分换取有形奖励。在写作和数学任务中,学生自主选择标准的小组比外部选择标准的小组表现出更多的正确回答。

相似文献

1
Self-selection of standards by children: The relative effectiveness of pupil-selected and teacher-selected standards of performance.儿童的自我选择标准:学生自选和教师选的表现标准的相对有效性。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1981 Winter;14(4):425-33. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-425.
2
Effects of reinforcement on children's academic behavior as a function of self-determined and externally imposed contingencies.强化对儿童学业行为的影响,取决于自我决定和外部强加的条件。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Summer;6(2):241-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-241.
3
Academic response rate as a function of teacher- and self-imposed contingencies.作为教师和自我强加条件的函数的学术回应率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):49-53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-49.
4
Training teachers in generalized writing of behavior modification programs for multihandicapped deaf children.对教师进行针对多重残疾失聪儿童的行为矫正计划通用写作培训。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1982 Spring;15(1):111-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-111.
5
Systematic reinforcement: academic performance of underachieving students.系统强化:提高学业不良学生的学习成绩。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1971 Winter;4(4):311-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1971.4-311.
6
Effects of goal structures and performance contingencies on the math performance of adolescents with learning disabilities.目标结构和绩效偶然性对学习障碍青少年数学成绩的影响。
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Nov;22(9):554-60. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200907.
7
Improving teenagers' knowledge of emergency contraception: cluster randomised controlled trial of a teacher led intervention.提高青少年对紧急避孕的认知:一项由教师主导干预措施的整群随机对照试验
BMJ. 2002 May 18;324(7347):1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7347.1179.
8
9
A methodological and substantive review of the evidence that schools cause pupils to smoke.对学校导致学生吸烟这一证据的方法学与实质性综述。
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jun;58(11):2253-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2003.08.012.
10
Butt in, butt out: pupils' views on the extent to which staff could and should enforce smoking restrictions.介入与退出:学生对教职工在多大程度上能够且应该执行吸烟限制的看法。
Health Educ Res. 2004 Feb;19(1):40-50. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg005.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing the right to habilitation with the right to personal liberties: the rights of people with developmental disabilities to eat too many doughnuts and take a nap.平衡康复训练权与个人自由权:发育障碍者吃过多甜甜圈和小睡的权利。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1990 Spring;23(1):79-89. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-79.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of reinforcement on children's academic behavior as a function of self-determined and externally imposed contingencies.强化对儿童学业行为的影响,取决于自我决定和外部强加的条件。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Summer;6(2):241-50. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-241.
2
Behavioral self-control of on-task behavior in an elementary classroom.小学生课堂行为的自律。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1973 Spring;6(1):105-13. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-105.
3
Academic response rate as a function of teacher- and self-imposed contingencies.作为教师和自我强加条件的函数的学术回应率。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1969 Spring;2(1):49-53. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-49.
4
Motivational orientation and the relative efficacy of self-monitored and externally imposed reinforcement systems in children.儿童的动机取向以及自我监控和外部施加的强化系统的相对功效
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1974 Sep;30(3):360-6. doi: 10.1037/h0036902.
5
Self-control training in the classroom: a review and critique.课堂中的自我控制训练:综述与评论
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Fall;12(3):467-85. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-467.
6
Applications of self-control procedures by children: a review.儿童自我控制程序的应用:综述
J Appl Behav Anal. 1979 Fall;12(3):449-65. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1979.12-449.