Nichter Mark, Thompson Jennifer Jo
Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85721, USA.
Cult Med Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;30(2):175-222. doi: 10.1007/s11013-006-9016-0.
Passage of the DSHEA in 1994 created a new "liminal" category for the FDA: dietary supplements are regulated as neither food nor drugs. However, there appears to be a significant disconnect between the "official" discourse surrounding dietary supplements and supplement users' actual practices. Despite this discrepancy, and the inadequacy of surveys to capture the dynamics of pharmaceutical practice, there is little ethnographic information available on the ways that Americans think about or use dietary supplements. We offer some preliminary observations from a pilot ethnographic study of Americans' use of dietary supplements in which we consider not only the reasons why people are using supplements, but how they are using them, and how their experimentation has been influenced by the information they seek and receive from a variety of sources. We illustrate how anthropological studies of supplement related practice can help us better understand Americans' attraction to and use of dietary supplements, and suggest that anthropology can contribute to a more balanced perspective on supplement use-one that moves the study of supplements beyond surveys and randomized controlled studies of efficacy to considerations of patterns of use in context, user expectations, and measures of perceived effectiveness.
1994年《膳食补充剂健康与教育法》(DSHEA)的通过为美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)创造了一个新的“临界”类别:膳食补充剂既不作为食品也不作为药品进行监管。然而,围绕膳食补充剂的“官方”论述与补充剂使用者的实际做法之间似乎存在明显脱节。尽管存在这种差异,且调查不足以捕捉药物使用的动态情况,但关于美国人如何看待或使用膳食补充剂的人种志信息却很少。我们提供了一项关于美国人使用膳食补充剂的试点人种志研究的一些初步观察结果,在该研究中,我们不仅考虑了人们使用补充剂的原因,还考虑了他们如何使用补充剂,以及他们的尝试是如何受到他们从各种来源寻求和获得的信息的影响。我们说明了对与补充剂相关实践的人类学研究如何能帮助我们更好地理解美国人对膳食补充剂的喜爱和使用,并表明人类学可以为更平衡地看待补充剂使用做出贡献——这种视角将补充剂研究从疗效的调查和随机对照研究扩展到对使用情境模式、使用者期望以及感知有效性衡量标准的考量。