Suppr超能文献

癌症的微创食管切除术:腹腔镜胃游离术的前瞻性评估

Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization.

作者信息

Godiris-Petit Gaelle, Munoz-Bongrand Nicolas, Honigman Isabelle, Cattan Pierre, Sarfati Emile

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Hospital Saint-Louis, 1 avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75010, Paris, France.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1434-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0627-3.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Esophagectomy carries high morbidity, mainly respiratory. Minimally invasive surgery has been demonstrated to improve postoperative outcome in digestive surgery, without impairment of oncological results. A prospective study was conducted to evaluate feasibility, postoperative outcome, and mid-term oncological results of minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in cancer.

METHODS

From July 2001 to August 2005, 25 patients underwent esophagectomy with laparoscopic gastric mobilization (LGM) for epidermoid carcinoma (n=15) or adenocarcinoma (n=10). Tumors were located on the cardia (n=6), on the lower third (n=14), or on the median third (n=5) of the esophagus. Following LGM, transthoracic esophagectomy was performed.

RESULTS

Complete LGM was achieved in all patients but 1. Mean operative time for LGM was 191+/-49 minutes. Fifteen patients (60%) developed complications, mainly respiratory. Anastomotic leakage occurred in 2 patients, with a favorable outcome. Pylorospasm (n=1) was the only intra-abdominal complication. Median hospital stay was 18 days. Two patients died (8%). Twenty-three patients underwent R0 resection. A mean of 12+/-4 lymph nodes (range 4-19 nodes) were analyzed. With a mean follow-up of 14 months (1-46 months), actuarial survival at 1 and 2 years was, respectively, 73% and 56%.

CONCLUSION

Esophagectomy with LGM is feasible with few specific complications. However, no decrease in morbidity and hospital stay could be observed. Mid-term oncological results seem comparable to those of conventional surgery. Further studies are required to evaluate the extent of lymphadenectomy and the oncologic safety of MIE.

摘要

背景

食管切除术具有较高的发病率,主要是呼吸系统相关的。微创外科手术已被证明可改善消化外科手术的术后结局,且不影响肿瘤学效果。本前瞻性研究旨在评估微创食管癌切除术(MIE)治疗癌症的可行性、术后结局及中期肿瘤学效果。

方法

2001年7月至2005年8月,25例患者因表皮样癌(n = 15)或腺癌(n = 10)接受了腹腔镜胃游离术(LGM)联合食管切除术。肿瘤位于贲门(n = 6)、食管下三分之一(n = 14)或食管中三分之一(n = 5)。在LGM之后,进行经胸食管切除术。

结果

除1例患者外,所有患者均成功完成LGM。LGM的平均手术时间为191±49分钟。15例患者(60%)出现并发症,主要是呼吸系统相关的。2例患者发生吻合口漏,结局良好。幽门痉挛(n = 1)是唯一的腹腔内并发症。中位住院时间为18天。2例患者死亡(8%)。23例患者接受了R0切除。平均分析了12±4个淋巴结(范围为4 - 19个淋巴结)。平均随访14个月(1 - 46个月),1年和2年的精算生存率分别为73%和56%。

结论

LGM联合食管切除术是可行的,且特定并发症较少。然而,未观察到发病率和住院时间的降低。中期肿瘤学效果似乎与传统手术相当。需要进一步研究来评估淋巴结清扫范围及MIE的肿瘤学安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验