• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放性与腹腔镜辅助食管癌切除术治疗癌症:一项多中心随机对照 III 期试验——MIRO 试验。

Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial.

机构信息

Department of Digestive and Oncological Surgery, University Hospital, Place de Verdun, Lille, F-59037, France.

出版信息

BMC Cancer. 2011 Jul 23;11:310. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-310.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2407-11-310
PMID:21781337
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3156811/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Open transthoracic oesophagectomy is the standard treatment for infracarinal resectable oesophageal carcinomas, although it is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates of 2 to 10% and 30 to 50%, respectively, for both the abdominal and thoracic approaches. The worldwide popularity of laparoscopic techniques is based on promising results, including lower postoperative morbidity rates, which are related to the reduced postoperative trauma. We hypothesise that the laparoscopic abdominal approach (laparoscopic gastric mobilisation) in oesophageal cancer surgery will decrease the major postoperative complication rate due to the reduced surgical trauma.

METHODS/DESIGN: The MIRO trial is an open, controlled, prospective, randomised multicentre phase III trial. Patients in study arm A will receive laparoscopic-assisted oesophagectomy, i.e., a transthoracic oesophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy and laparoscopic gastric mobilisation. Patients in study arm B will receive the same procedure, but with the conventional open abdominal approach. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the major postoperative 30-day morbidity. Secondary objectives are to assess the overall 30-day morbidity, 30-day mortality, 30-day pulmonary morbidity, disease-free survival, overall survival as well as quality of life and to perform medico-economic analysis. A total of 200 patients will be enrolled, and two safety analyses will be performed using 25 and 50 patients included in arm A.

DISCUSSION

Postoperative morbidity remains high after oesophageal cancer surgery, especially due to major pulmonary complications, which are responsible for 50% of the postoperative deaths. This study represents the first randomised controlled phase III trial to evaluate the benefits of the minimally invasive approach with respect to the postoperative course and oncological outcomes in oesophageal cancer surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT00937456 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

摘要

背景

开胸食管癌切除术是可切除的胸腔内食管癌的标准治疗方法,尽管它与高死亡率和高发病率相关,腹部和胸部入路的死亡率和发病率分别为 2%至 10%和 30%至 50%。腹腔镜技术在全球范围内的普及基于有前景的结果,包括较低的术后发病率,这与术后创伤的减少有关。我们假设在食管癌手术中使用腹腔镜腹部入路(腹腔镜胃动员)将降低主要术后并发症的发生率,这是由于手术创伤减少所致。

方法/设计:MIRO 试验是一项开放、对照、前瞻性、随机、多中心 III 期试验。研究组 A 的患者将接受腹腔镜辅助食管癌切除术,即经胸食管癌切除术和两野淋巴结清扫术联合腹腔镜胃动员。研究组 B 的患者将接受相同的手术,但采用传统的开腹腹部入路。该研究的主要目的是评估主要术后 30 天的发病率。次要目标是评估整体 30 天发病率、30 天死亡率、30 天肺部发病率、无病生存率、总生存率以及生活质量,并进行医疗经济学分析。将纳入 200 例患者,在研究组 A 中纳入 25 例和 50 例患者时将进行两次安全性分析。

讨论

食管癌手术后的术后发病率仍然很高,尤其是由于主要肺部并发症,这占术后死亡的 50%。这项研究代表了第一项评估微创方法在食管癌手术中对术后过程和肿瘤学结果的益处的随机对照 III 期试验。

试验注册

NCT00937456(ClinicalTrials.gov)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee76/3156811/f313cbf411b4/1471-2407-11-310-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee76/3156811/f313cbf411b4/1471-2407-11-310-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee76/3156811/f313cbf411b4/1471-2407-11-310-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Open versus laparoscopically-assisted oesophagectomy for cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled phase III trial - the MIRO trial.开放性与腹腔镜辅助食管癌切除术治疗癌症:一项多中心随机对照 III 期试验——MIRO 试验。
BMC Cancer. 2011 Jul 23;11:310. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-310.
2
Open three-stage transthoracic oesophagectomy versus minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer: protocol for a multicentre prospective, open and parallel, randomised controlled trial.开放性三阶段经胸食管癌切除术与微创胸腹腔镜食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较:一项多中心前瞻性、开放平行随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2015 Nov 17;5(11):e008328. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008328.
3
Laparoscopically assisted versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer-the Randomised Oesophagectomy: Minimally Invasive or Open (ROMIO) study: protocol for a randomised controlled trial (RCT).腹腔镜辅助与开放性食管癌切除术治疗食管癌患者的随机对照试验(ROMIO 研究):方案设计
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 19;9(11):e030907. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030907.
4
Laparoscopic versus open transhiatal oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer.腹腔镜与开放经裂孔食管癌切除术治疗食管癌的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;3(3):CD011390. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011390.pub2.
5
Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoraco-laparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer, a randomized controlled trial (ROBOT trial).机器人辅助微创胸腹腔镜食管切除术与开胸食管切除术治疗可切除食管癌的随机对照试验(ROBOT 试验)。
Trials. 2012 Nov 30;13:230. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-230.
6
Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer.杂交微创食管癌切除术。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Jan 10;380(2):152-162. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1805101.
7
Overall morbidity after total minimally invasive keyhole oesophagectomy versus hybrid oesophagectomy (the MICkey trial): study protocol for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.全微创锁孔与杂交食管切除术(MICkey 试验)后总体发病率:一项多中心随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Mar 10;24(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07134-1.
8
Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.微创与开放手术治疗食管癌的疗效比较:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照临床试验。
Lancet. 2012 May 19;379(9829):1887-92. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60516-9. Epub 2012 May 1.
9
Thoracoscopic and laparoscopic oesophagectomy improves the quality of extended lymphadenectomy.胸腔镜和腹腔镜食管切除术可提高扩大淋巴结清扫的质量。
Surg Endosc. 2006 Aug;20(8):1308-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-006-2020-1. Epub 2006 Jul 31.
10
Effects of hybrid minimally invasive oesophagectomy on major postoperative pulmonary complications.杂交微创食管切除术对主要术后肺部并发症的影响。
Br J Surg. 2012 Nov;99(11):1547-53. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8931.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating Postoperative Morbidity and Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Esophagectomy in Esophageal Cancer Treatment-A Comprehensive Review on Behalf of TROGSS (The Robotic Global Surgical Society) and EFISDS (European Federation International Society for Digestive Surgery) Joint Working Group.评估机器人辅助食管癌切除术的术后发病率及治疗结果——代表机器人全球外科学会(TROGSS)和欧洲消化外科学会国际联合会(EFISDS)联合工作组的综合综述
Curr Oncol. 2025 Jan 28;32(2):72. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32020072.
2
Effect of Preoperative Body Composition on Postoperative Anastomotic Leakage in Oncological Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy-A Retrospective Cohort Study.术前身体组成对肿瘤学Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后吻合口漏的影响——一项回顾性队列研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;16(24):4217. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244217.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Oncologic efficacy is not compromised, and may be improved with minimally invasive esophagectomy.微创食管切除术不会影响肿瘤疗效,甚至可能改善肿瘤疗效。
J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Apr;212(4):560-6; discussion 566-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.12.042.
2
Traditional invasive vs. minimally invasive esophagectomy: a multi-center, randomized trial (TIME-trial).传统开放性与微创性食管切除术对比:一项多中心随机试验(TIME试验)
BMC Surg. 2011 Jan 12;11:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-11-2.
3
Time until definitive quality of life score deterioration as a means of longitudinal analysis for treatment trials in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
History and evidence for state of the art of lymphadenectomy in esophageal cancer surgery.食管癌手术中淋巴结清扫术的历史和现状。
Dis Esophagus. 2024 Apr 2;37(4). doi: 10.1093/dote/doad065.
4
Minimally invasive surgery for gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Current evidence and future perspectives.胃食管交界腺癌的微创手术:当前证据与未来展望。
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2023 Oct 15;15(10):1675-1690. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v15.i10.1675.
5
[Anastomotic techniques in minimally invasive esophageal and gastric surgery].[微创食管和胃手术中的吻合技术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023 Sep;94(9):759-767. doi: 10.1007/s00104-023-01902-0. Epub 2023 Jun 26.
6
Management of Esophago-Gastric Junction Carcinoma: A Narrative Multidisciplinary Review.食管胃交界部癌的管理:一项叙述性多学科综述
Cancers (Basel). 2023 May 3;15(9):2597. doi: 10.3390/cancers15092597.
7
Robot-assisted transthoracic hybrid esophagectomy versus open and laparoscopic hybrid esophagectomy: propensity score matched analysis of short-term outcome.机器人辅助经胸杂交食管癌切除术与开放和腹腔镜杂交食管癌切除术:短期结果的倾向评分匹配分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3357-3365. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02667-6. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
8
Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland (AUGIS)/Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement on intraoperative and postoperative interventions to reduce pulmonary complications after oesophagectomy.英国和爱尔兰上消化道外科协会(AUGIS)/围手术期质量倡议(POQI)关于减少食管切除术后肺部并发症的术中及术后干预的共识声明。
Br J Surg. 2022 Oct 14;109(11):1096-1106. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znac193.
9
Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom in the Surgical Treatment of Barrett's Adenocarcinoma.巴雷特腺癌外科治疗中的今日之误与明日之智
Visc Med. 2022 Jun;38(3):203-211. doi: 10.1159/000524928. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
The effect of age on short-term and mid-term outcomes after thoracoscopic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.年龄对胸腔镜Ivor Lewis食管癌切除术后短期和中期结局的影响:一项倾向评分匹配分析。
BMC Surg. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01435-5.
用于转移性胰腺腺癌患者治疗试验的纵向分析的明确生活质量评分恶化时间。
Eur J Cancer. 2010 Oct;46(15):2753-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2010.07.023. Epub 2010 Aug 17.
4
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer.癌症的微创食管切除术
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):13-20; discussion 20-1. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.09.024. Epub 2008 Oct 25.
5
[Respiratory complications after oesophagectomy for cancer].[食管癌切除术后的呼吸并发症]
Rev Mal Respir. 2008 Jun;25(6):683-94. doi: 10.1016/s0761-8425(08)73798-7.
6
Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer.食管癌微创切除术的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2007 Dec;94(12):1461-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6015.
7
Therapeutic strategies in oesophageal carcinoma: role of surgery and other modalities.食管癌的治疗策略:手术及其他治疗方式的作用
Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):545-53. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70172-9.
8
Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement.用于食管替代的腹腔镜下胃缺血预处理
Ann Surg. 2007 Feb;245(2):241-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245847.40779.10.
9
Comparison of the outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy.开放手术与微创食管切除术的疗效比较。
Ann Surg. 2007 Feb;245(2):232-40. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000225093.58071.c6.
10
Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer: prospective evaluation of laparoscopic gastric mobilization.癌症的微创食管切除术:腹腔镜胃游离术的前瞻性评估
World J Surg. 2006 Aug;30(8):1434-40. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0627-3.