Suppr超能文献

[Assessment of pain in advanced dementia. Construct validity of the German PAINAD].

作者信息

Basler H D, Hüger D, Kunz R, Luckmann J, Lukas A, Nikolaus T, Schuler M S

机构信息

Institut für Medizinische Psychologie, Philipps-Universität, Bunsenstrasse 3, 35037 Marburg.

出版信息

Schmerz. 2006 Nov;20(6):519-26. doi: 10.1007/s00482-006-0490-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The observation scale PAINAD (pain assessment in advanced dementia) is composed of five behavioral categories: breathing, vocalization, facial expression, body language, and consolability. The present study investigates the construct validity of the German version.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective one-dimensional observation study with repeated measurements (t(1)=pretreatment, t(2)=2 h posttreatment, t(3)=24 h posttreatment). The sample consisted of 12 verbally noncommunicative demented inpatients with severe comorbidity treated in three geriatric clinics. Their age was M=84.3 years (SD=4.4) on the average. Ten of them were female. Inclusion criteria were pain-related physical illness and observed pain behavior. Every patient was treated with analgesics after t(1). After t(2) the medication was discontinued in five patients until t(3). Nurses documented the PAINAD scores after an observation period of 2 min during routine care.

RESULTS

Pain behavior at t(2) diminished considerably displaying a large effect size. Scores continued to be low at t(3) only in the sample with continued medication. Scores in the other part of the sample returned to initial values.

CONCLUSION

The data demonstrate that pain medication strongly impacts the pain behavior of demented patients. The outcome supports the assumption that PAINAD really measures pain.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验