• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对在职人群莱姆病预防项目的评估。

An evaluation of a Lyme disease prevention program in a working population.

作者信息

Nolan Karen, Mauer Matthew P

机构信息

New York State Department of Health, Bureau of Environmental and Occupational Epidemiology, Center for Environmental Health, Troy, New York 12180, USA.

出版信息

Am J Health Promot. 2006 Jul-Aug;20(6):379-82. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.6.379.

DOI:10.4278/0890-1171-20.6.379
PMID:16871815
Abstract

PURPOSE

Lyme disease vaccine was offered to New York State Department of Health employees considered at risk for Lyme disease because of their job duties. This evaluation was conducted to assess (1) attitudes that affected employees' decisions to accept or decline the vaccine, (2) preventive behaviors among employees who received the vaccine, and (3) effectiveness of the educational modalities offered in improving knowledge of Lyme disease and Lyme disease vaccine.

METHODS

A total of 190 eligible employees were identified and were offered two educational modalities before deciding whether to receive the vaccine. The subsequent evaluation involved three telephone interviews, one pre-education and two posteducation-vaccination, to assess factors affecting the decision about vaccination and attitudes, behaviors, and knowledge among vaccine recipients (N=30) and nonrecipients (N=160).

RESULTS

This evaluation indicated that the majority of vaccine recipients decided to receive the vaccine because of an anticipated risk of tick exposure. For employees who declined vaccination, many were concerned about the safety (64%), novelty (56%), or efficacy (48%) of the vaccine. Posteducation knowledge of Lyme disease vaccine significantly improved among those who attended an education session compared with those who did not and was retained 1 year later.

DISCUSSION

The results suggest that when a vaccine-related disease-prevention program is undertaken, (1) attitudes about disease risks and vaccine risks influence decisions to accept vaccination, and (2) in-person education should be a mandatory element of the program.

摘要

目的

向纽约州卫生部中因工作职责而被认为有莱姆病风险的员工提供莱姆病疫苗。进行此次评估是为了评估:(1)影响员工决定接受或拒绝接种疫苗的态度;(2)接种疫苗的员工的预防行为;(3)所提供的教育方式在提高莱姆病及莱姆病疫苗知识方面的有效性。

方法

共确定了190名符合条件的员工,并在他们决定是否接种疫苗之前提供了两种教育方式。随后的评估包括三次电话访谈,一次在教育前,两次在教育接种疫苗后,以评估影响接种疫苗决定的因素以及疫苗接种者(N = 30)和未接种者(N = 160)的态度、行为和知识。

结果

此次评估表明,大多数疫苗接种者决定接种疫苗是因为预计有蜱虫暴露风险。对于拒绝接种疫苗的员工,许多人担心疫苗的安全性(64%)、新颖性(56%)或有效性(48%)。与未参加教育课程的人相比,参加教育课程的人在教育接种疫苗后对莱姆病疫苗的知识有显著提高,并且在1年后仍得以保持。

讨论

结果表明,当开展与疫苗相关的疾病预防项目时,(1)对疾病风险和疫苗风险的态度会影响接受疫苗接种的决定;(2)面对面教育应成为该项目的一个强制性要素。

相似文献

1
An evaluation of a Lyme disease prevention program in a working population.对在职人群莱姆病预防项目的评估。
Am J Health Promot. 2006 Jul-Aug;20(6):379-82. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-20.6.379.
2
The Lyme disease vaccine--a public health perspective.莱姆病疫苗——公共卫生视角。
Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;52 Suppl 3:s247-52. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq115.
3
Strategies for primary and secondary prevention of Lyme disease.莱姆病一级和二级预防策略。
Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2007 Jan;3(1):20-5. doi: 10.1038/ncprheum0374.
4
The Lyme vaccine: a cautionary tale.莱姆病疫苗:一个警示故事。
Epidemiol Infect. 2007 Jan;135(1):1-8. doi: 10.1017/S0950268806007096. Epub 2006 Aug 8.
5
Evaluating public acceptability of a potential Lyme disease vaccine using a population-based, cross-sectional survey in high incidence areas of the United States.在美国高发病地区采用基于人群的横断面调查评估潜在莱姆病疫苗的公众可接受性。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.065. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis of the Lyme disease vaccine.莱姆病疫苗的成本效益分析。
Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Jun;46(6):1651-60. doi: 10.1002/art.10270.
7
Lyme disease vaccine as a strategy for prevention.莱姆病疫苗作为一种预防策略。
J Pediatr. 2001 Apr;138(4):609-10. doi: 10.1067/mpd.2001.108705.
8
Lyme disease knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors--Connecticut, 1992.莱姆病的知识、态度及行为——康涅狄格州,1992年
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1992 Jul 17;41(28):505-7.
9
A vaccine against Lyme disease.一种预防莱姆病的疫苗。
Health News. 1999 Feb 1;5(2):1-2.
10
Preview: Lyme disease vaccines.预览:莱姆病疫苗。
Med Health R I. 1998 Nov;81(11):373-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Employee Participation in Workplace Vaccination Campaigns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.员工参与职场疫苗接种活动:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2022 Nov 10;10(11):1898. doi: 10.3390/vaccines10111898.
2
Personal protection measures to prevent tick bites in the United States: Knowledge gaps, challenges, and opportunities.美国预防蜱虫叮咬的个人防护措施:知识缺口、挑战和机遇。
Ticks Tick Borne Dis. 2022 Jul;13(4):101944. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2022.101944. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
3
Evaluating public acceptability of a potential Lyme disease vaccine using a population-based, cross-sectional survey in high incidence areas of the United States.
在美国高发病地区采用基于人群的横断面调查评估潜在莱姆病疫苗的公众可接受性。
Vaccine. 2022 Jan 21;40(2):298-305. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.11.065. Epub 2021 Dec 8.
4
Interventions to prevent Lyme disease in humans: A systematic review.预防人类莱姆病的干预措施:一项系统评价。
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 13;13:16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.004. eCollection 2019 Mar.
5
Intentions to receive a potentially available Lyme disease vaccine in an urban sample.在一个城市样本中接种潜在可用的莱姆病疫苗的意向。
Ther Adv Vaccines. 2016 Jan;4(1-2):3-14. doi: 10.1177/2051013616629881. Epub 2016 Jan 1.
6
Ticking all the boxes? A systematic review of education and communication interventions to prevent tick-borne disease.是否满足所有要求?预防蜱传疾病的教育和沟通干预措施的系统评价。
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Sep;12(9):817-25. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0774. Epub 2012 May 18.