King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London, UK.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012 Sep;12(9):817-25. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2011.0774. Epub 2012 May 18.
Tick-borne disease has become increasingly prevalent across Europe. Despite the effectiveness of protective behaviors, relatively few people adopt them when in areas where ticks are known to be present. In this systematic review we identified studies that assessed the impact of any educational or behavioral interventions intended to encourage the widespread use of protective behaviors against tick-borne disease. An extensive search of electronic databases returned a total of only nine such studies. Only two of these were fully randomized controlled trials, with the remaining studies using weaker designs and often relying solely on self-reports to assess behavior. The majority of research in this area has not explicitly noted the consideration of any formal psychological theory on how best to promote behaviors that protect health. Nonetheless, the results show that both knowledge of and attitudes towards tick-borne disease are amenable to change, although the stability of these changes over time has not yet been determined. Not all intervention strategies have proved effective, with some producing detrimental effects. More theory-based, methodologically-robust studies are urgently required if we are to gain a better understanding of the most effective strategies for encouraging members of the public to adopt behaviors known to protect against tick-borne disease.
蜱传疾病在欧洲的发病率越来越高。尽管采取防护行为是有效的,但在已知有蜱虫存在的地区,相对较少的人会采取这些行为。在这项系统评价中,我们确定了评估任何旨在鼓励广泛使用预防蜱传疾病的防护行为的教育或行为干预措施的影响的研究。对电子数据库进行了广泛搜索,总共只返回了 9 项此类研究。其中只有两项是完全随机对照试验,其余研究采用的设计较弱,并且经常仅依靠自我报告来评估行为。该领域的大多数研究都没有明确指出考虑任何关于如何最好地促进保护健康的行为的正式心理理论。尽管如此,研究结果表明,蜱传疾病的知识和态度都易于改变,尽管这些变化随时间的稳定性尚未确定。并非所有干预策略都被证明有效,有些策略产生了不利影响。如果我们要更好地了解鼓励公众采取已知可预防蜱传疾病的行为的最有效策略,就迫切需要更多基于理论、方法稳健的研究。