Ole Fanger P
Department of Mechanical Engineering, International Centre for Indoor Environment and Energy, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
Indoor Air. 2006 Oct;16(5):328-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0668.2006.00437.x.
In spaces for human occupancy indoor air quality (IAQ) is often defined as the extent to which human requirements are met. But what requirements do people have in relation to indoor air? The desire is that the air be perceived as fresh and pleasant, that it has no negative impact on their health, and that the air is stimulating and promotes their work, i.e. it increases their productivity and the learning of their children in the classroom at school. Present ventilation standards and guidelines do not care about productivity and learning and have the very modest requirement that the indoor air shall be 'acceptable,' meaning that the most sensitive group of persons (usually 20%) perceive the air as unacceptable while the remaining less sensitive persons may find the air barely acceptable. With such a modest aim it is not surprising that comprehensive field studies in many countries in buildings in which ventilation standards are met show high percentages of dissatisfied persons and of those suffering from sick building syndrome symptoms. Recent studies show that improvement of IAQ by a factor of 2-7 compared with existing standards increases office productivity and school learning significantly, while decreasing the risk of allergic symptoms and asthma in homes. To make indoor air acceptable, even for the most sensitive persons, an improvement of 1-2 orders of magnitude may be required. The paper will discuss the development of new methods that can provide such substantial improvements of IAQ while maintaining or even decreasing ventilation and energy usage. A paradigm shift is required and further future shifts are foreseen where we learn how to make indoor air equally fresh and pleasant as outdoors when it is best. Or even better, i.e. 'out of this world.'
The paper estimates an enormous potential for improving IAQ in practice utilizing new emerging technologies. This will enable us to provide IAQ which is acceptable even for the most sensitive persons. Already modest improvements compared to present minimum standards and typical conditions in practice can significantly decrease the risk of asthma/allergy in homes, improve learning in schools and increase productivity.
在供人居住的空间中,室内空气质量(IAQ)通常被定义为满足人类需求的程度。但是人们对室内空气有哪些需求呢?人们希望空气被感知为清新宜人,对健康没有负面影响,并且空气具有刺激性并能促进工作,也就是说,它能提高工作效率以及孩子在学校课堂上的学习效果。目前的通风标准和指南并不关注工作效率和学习,仅有非常适度的要求,即室内空气应“可接受”,这意味着最敏感的人群(通常为20%)认为空气不可接受,而其余不太敏感的人可能觉得空气勉强可接受。鉴于这样一个适度的目标,在许多国家符合通风标准的建筑物中进行的全面实地研究显示,不满意的人群以及患有病态建筑综合症症状的人群比例很高,这并不奇怪。最近的研究表明,与现有标准相比,将室内空气质量提高2至7倍可显著提高办公效率和学校学习效果,同时降低家庭中出现过敏症状和哮喘的风险。为了使室内空气即使对最敏感的人也可接受,可能需要提高1至2个数量级。本文将讨论新方法的开发,这些方法能够在保持甚至降低通风和能源使用的同时,大幅改善室内空气质量。需要进行范式转变,并且预计未来还会有进一步的转变,即我们要学会如何在最佳状态下使室内空气与室外一样清新宜人。甚至更好,即“超凡脱俗”。
本文估计利用新兴技术在实践中改善室内空气质量具有巨大潜力。这将使我们能够提供即使对最敏感的人也可接受的室内空气质量。与目前的最低标准和实际典型条件相比,即使是适度的改善也能显著降低家庭中哮喘/过敏的风险,提高学校学习效果并提高工作效率。