Gentil Paulo, Oliveira Elke, Bottaro Martim
College of Health Sciences, University of Brasilia, Brazil.
J Physiol Anthropol. 2006 Sep;25(5):339-44. doi: 10.2114/jpa2.25.339.
Mechanical stimuli have often been suggested to be the major determinant of resistance training adaptations; however, some studies suggested that metabolic changes also play an important role in the gains of muscle size and strength. Several resistance training methods (RTM) have been employed with the purpose of manipulating mechanical and metabolic stimuli; however, information about their physiological effects are scarce. The objective of this study was to compare the time under tension (TUT) and blood lactate responses among four different RTM reported in the literature. The four RTM were performed in a knee extension machine at 10 repetition maximum (RM) load by 12 recreationally trained young men. The RTM tested were: 10RM, super-slow (SL-subjects performed one 60-second repetition with 30 seconds for eccentric and 30 seconds for concentric phase), functional isometrics (FI-in each repetition, a five-second maximal isometric contraction was executed with the knees fully extended) and adapted vascular occlusion (VO-subjects performed a 20-second maximal isometric contraction with the knees fully extended and immediately proceeded to normal isoinertial lifts). According to the results, all RTM produced significant increases in blood lactate levels. However, blood lactate responses during FI (4.48+/-1.57 mM) and VO (4.23+/-1.66 mM) methods were higher than the SL method (3.41+/-1.14 mM). The TUT for SL (60 s), FI (56.33+/-6.46 s), and VO (53.08+/-4.76 s) methods were higher than TUT for 10RM (42.08+/-3.18 s). Additionally, TUT for the SL method was higher than TUT during the VO method. Therefore, the SL method may not be recommended if one wants to provide a high metabolic stimulus. The FI method appeared to be especially effective in promoting both type of stimuli.
机械刺激常被认为是抗阻训练适应性变化的主要决定因素;然而,一些研究表明,代谢变化在肌肉大小和力量增长中也起着重要作用。为了调控机械和代谢刺激,人们采用了多种抗阻训练方法(RTM);然而,关于它们生理效应的信息却很匮乏。本研究的目的是比较文献中报道的四种不同RTM的张力时间(TUT)和血乳酸反应。12名经过休闲训练的年轻男性在膝关节伸展器械上以10次重复最大值(RM)负荷进行了这四种RTM。所测试的RTM为:10RM、超慢速(SL——受试者进行一次60秒重复,离心阶段30秒,向心阶段30秒)、功能性等长收缩(FI——在每次重复中,膝关节完全伸展时进行5秒的最大等长收缩)和适应性血管闭塞(VO——受试者膝关节完全伸展时进行20秒的最大等长收缩,然后立即进行正常的等惯性举重)。根据结果,所有RTM都使血乳酸水平显著升高。然而,FI(4.48±1.57 mM)和VO(4.23±1.66 mM)方法期间的血乳酸反应高于SL方法(3.41±1.14 mM)。SL(60秒)、FI(56.33±6.46秒)和VO(53.08±4.76秒)方法的TUT高于10RM(42.08±3.18秒)的TUT。此外,SL方法的TUT高于VO方法期间的TUT。因此,如果想要提供高代谢刺激,可能不推荐使用SL方法。FI方法似乎在促进两种刺激方面特别有效。