• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床医生对前列腺癌同伴支持小组的态度。

Clinicians' attitudes to prostate cancer peer-support groups.

作者信息

Steginga Suzanne K, Smith David P, Pinnock Carole, Metcalfe Robyn, Gardiner Robert A, Dunn Jeff

机构信息

Community Services, Queensland Cancer Fund, PO Box 201, Spring Hill QLD 4004, Australia.

出版信息

BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):68-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06545.x. Epub 2006 Oct 9.

DOI:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06545.x
PMID:17026599
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess clinicians' knowledge and attitudes to prostate cancer peer-support groups, essential in improving support services for men with prostate cancer, as patients' perceptions of their clinicians' attitudes to such groups predict patients' positive and negative perceptions of their experiences at such groups.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

In all, 36 clinicians (75% response) across Australia, of whom 27 were urologists and nine were radiation oncologists, were interviewed in-depth using a key-informant approach. Nine clinicians were from regional Australia, with the remaining 27 from major metropolitan settings. Subsequently, 30 clinicians (69% response) completed surveys to confirm identified themes.

RESULTS

Peer support was rated positively by most clinicians and most report a fair to good knowledge of such groups. However, less than a quarter regularly refer their patients to these groups. While clinicians can describe positive aspects of peer support, many are concerned that biased viewpoints and misinformation within these groups might potentially contribute to patients' decisional uncertainty and regret.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research is needed to establish for whom these support groups are most helpful. Concerns about misleading information that might be proffered in support groups is a barrier to clinician referral to these groups. Dialogue between prostate cancer interest groups and clinicians to resolve concerns presents as a key strategy to improve support for men with prostate cancer.

摘要

目的

评估临床医生对前列腺癌同伴支持小组的了解和态度,这对于改善前列腺癌男性患者的支持服务至关重要,因为患者对临床医生对此类小组态度的看法会影响他们对此类小组经历的积极或消极认知。

研究对象与方法

采用关键信息人访谈法,对澳大利亚各地的36名临床医生(回应率75%)进行了深入访谈,其中27名是泌尿科医生,9名是放射肿瘤学家。9名临床医生来自澳大利亚地区,其余27名来自主要大都市地区。随后,30名临床医生(回应率69%)完成了调查以确认所确定的主题。

结果

大多数临床医生对同伴支持给予了积极评价,并且大多数人表示对这类小组有较好的了解。然而,不到四分之一的临床医生会定期将患者转介到这些小组。虽然临床医生能够描述同伴支持的积极方面,但许多人担心这些小组中的偏见观点和错误信息可能会导致患者决策时的不确定性和后悔情绪。

结论

需要进一步研究以确定这些支持小组对哪些人最有帮助。对支持小组中可能提供的误导性信息的担忧是临床医生将患者转介到这些小组的障碍。前列腺癌相关利益集团与临床医生之间就解决这些担忧进行对话是改善前列腺癌男性患者支持的关键策略。

相似文献

1
Clinicians' attitudes to prostate cancer peer-support groups.临床医生对前列腺癌同伴支持小组的态度。
BJU Int. 2007 Jan;99(1):68-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06545.x. Epub 2006 Oct 9.
2
Evaluating peer support for prostate cancer: the Prostate Cancer Peer Support Inventory.评估前列腺癌患者的同伴支持:前列腺癌同伴支持量表
BJU Int. 2005 Jan;95(1):46-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05247.x.
3
Psychosocial barriers to active surveillance for the management of early prostate cancer and a strategy for increased acceptance.早期前列腺癌管理中主动监测的社会心理障碍及提高接受度的策略
BJU Int. 2007 Sep;100(3):544-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.06981.x. Epub 2007 May 26.
4
Working patterns and perceived contribution of prostate cancer clinical nurse specialists: a mixed method investigation.前列腺癌临床护理专家的工作模式及自我认知贡献:一项混合方法研究
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Oct;46(10):1345-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 Apr 8.
5
Determinants of participation in social support groups for prostate cancer patients.前列腺癌患者参与社会支持团体的决定因素。
Psychooncology. 2007 Dec;16(12):1092-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.1160.
6
What models of peer support do people with colorectal cancer prefer?结直肠癌患者更喜欢哪种同伴支持模式?
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2011 Jul;20(4):455-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2010.01218.x. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
7
Education to improve cancer care in rural South Australia.改善南澳大利亚农村地区癌症护理的教育。
Rural Remote Health. 2009 Apr-Jun;9(2):1147. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
8
The effectiveness of a professionally led support group for men with prostate cancer.一个由专业人员主导的前列腺癌男性支持小组的有效性。
Urol Nurs. 1997 Jun;17(2):58-66.
9
Information priorities of Italian early-stage prostate cancer patients and of their health-care professionals.意大利早期前列腺癌患者及其医护人员的信息优先级
Patient Educ Couns. 2005 Feb;56(2):174-81. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2004.02.006.
10
Interventions that are helpful for depression and anxiety in young people: a comparison of clinicians' beliefs with those of youth and their parents.对年轻人抑郁和焦虑有帮助的干预措施:临床医生与年轻人及其父母信念的比较。
J Affect Disord. 2008 Dec;111(2-3):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.02.021. Epub 2008 Apr 14.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of support group leader experience with Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network Support group Leader EDucation Program outcomes: Secondary analysis of a two-arm parallel partially nested randomized controlled trial.硬皮病患者中心干预网络支持小组组长教育项目结果与支持小组组长经验的关联:双臂平行部分嵌套随机对照试验的二次分析
J Scleroderma Relat Disord. 2024 Sep 4:23971983241272742. doi: 10.1177/23971983241272742.
2
Utilization of Face-to-Face Vestibular Support Groups: A Comparison to Online Group Participation.面对面前庭支持小组的利用:与在线小组参与的比较。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2024 Aug;133(8):713-719. doi: 10.1177/00034894241241861. Epub 2024 May 13.
3
Prostate cancer peer navigation: an observational study on navigators' well-being, benefit finding, and program satisfaction.
前列腺癌同伴导航:对导航员的幸福感、受益感和项目满意度的观察性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 22;31(4):225. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07680-z.
4
Effects of a support group leader education program jointly developed by health professionals and patients on peer leader self-efficacy among leaders of scleroderma support groups: a two-arm parallel partially nested randomised controlled trial.由健康专业人员和患者共同制定的支持小组组长教育计划对硬皮病支持小组组长同行领导自我效能的影响:一项两臂平行部分嵌套随机对照试验。
Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2022 Oct 28;17(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s13023-022-02552-x.
5
Self-help friendliness in cancer care: A cross-sectional study among self-help group leaders in Germany.癌症关怀中的自助友好性:德国自助团体领导者的横断面研究。
Health Expect. 2022 Dec;25(6):3005-3016. doi: 10.1111/hex.13608. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
6
Family doctors' attitudes toward peer support programs for type 2 diabetes and/or coronary artery disease: an exploratory survey among German practitioners.家庭医生对 2 型糖尿病和/或冠状动脉疾病同伴支持计划的态度:德国从业者的一项探索性调查。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Aug 31;23(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01827-3.
7
A prospective and population-based inquiry on the use and acceptability of peer support for women newly diagnosed with breast cancer.一项针对新诊断为乳腺癌的女性使用同伴支持及其可接受性的前瞻性、基于人群的调查。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Feb;27(2):677-685. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4358-z. Epub 2018 Jul 28.
8
Pragmatic, consensus-based minimum standards and structured interview to guide the selection and development of cancer support group leaders: a protocol paper.基于共识的实用最低标准和结构化访谈,以指导癌症支持小组组长的选拔与培养:一份方案文件
BMJ Open. 2017 Jun 30;7(6):e014408. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014408.
9
Advocacy, support and survivorship in prostate cancer.前列腺癌的宣传、支持与生存
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2018 Mar;27(2):e12644. doi: 10.1111/ecc.12644. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Development and evaluation of a support program for prostate cancer survivors in Alaska.阿拉斯加前列腺癌幸存者支持项目的开发与评估
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Nov 25;74:28605. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.28605. eCollection 2015.