Wilbanks G A, Streilein J W
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Florida 33101.
Immunology. 1990 Nov;71(3):383-9.
A large body of information exists describing the inability of animals receiving inoculations of antigen either intravenously (i.v.) or via the anterior chamber of the eye (AC) to mount delayed hypersensitivity (DH) responses to the injected antigen. Evidence indicates that the deviant humoral and cellular immunity that follows AC and i.v. inoculations of antigen is mediated, in part, by active suppression. Because of these similarities, it has been argued that immune deviation resulting from the AC inoculation [anterior chamber-associated immune deviation (ACAID)] of antigen represents nothing more than deviant immune responses known to be induced by the i.v. inoculation of antigens. Since circumstantial evidence suggests that AC injections may have unique immune effects, we wished to test the hypothesis that AC exposure to antigen elicits a unique form of systemic immune regulation. We have studied and compared the functional and phenotypic properties of suppressor cell populations induced by AC and i.v. inoculations of a soluble antigen, bovine serum albumin (BSA). Results indicate that AC inoculations of BSA (but not i.v. inoculations) activate antigen-specific. CD8+, I-J+ T lymphocytes which suppress the expression of DH responses, i.e. efferent suppression. We further report that AC and i.v. injection routes both activate antigen-specific afferent suppressor cell populations which impair the inductive phase of the immune response. However, the i.v.-induced afferent suppressor cells are CD8+ I-J+, whereas the AC-induced afferent suppressor cells are CD4+. We conclude that AC and i.v. exposures to soluble antigens are not immunologically equivalent, and that ACAID represents a uniquely regulated systemic immune response to intraocular antigens.
大量信息表明,通过静脉内(i.v.)或经眼前房(AC)接种抗原的动物无法对注射的抗原产生迟发型超敏反应(DH)。有证据表明,AC和i.v.接种抗原后出现的异常体液免疫和细胞免疫部分是由主动抑制介导的。由于这些相似性,有人认为抗原的AC接种[前房相关免疫偏离(ACAID)]所导致的免疫偏离只不过是静脉内接种抗原所诱导的已知异常免疫反应。由于间接证据表明AC注射可能具有独特的免疫效应,我们希望检验这样一个假设,即AC接触抗原会引发一种独特形式的全身免疫调节。我们研究并比较了由AC和i.v.接种可溶性抗原牛血清白蛋白(BSA)诱导的抑制细胞群体的功能和表型特性。结果表明,BSA的AC接种(而非i.v.接种)激活了抗原特异性的CD8 +、I-J + T淋巴细胞,这些细胞抑制DH反应的表达,即传出抑制。我们进一步报告,AC和i.v.注射途径均激活了抗原特异性传入抑制细胞群体,这些细胞损害免疫反应的诱导阶段。然而,i.v.诱导的传入抑制细胞是CD8 + I-J +,而AC诱导的传入抑制细胞是CD4 +。我们得出结论,AC和i.v.接触可溶性抗原在免疫学上并不等同,并且ACAID代表了对眼内抗原的一种独特调节的全身免疫反应。